Vortex based mathematics

[and 3 guests]

safe bro.

[and 3 guests]

safe bro.

[butt jolokia]

init

[slothrop]

So yeah, have we now established that despite this stuff being blindingly simple to do and having been known about for at least a hundred years and there being loads of youtube videos and books (ker-ching) and lectures (ker-ching) and patent applications (ker-ching) where people talk about how to do it, noone's quite got around to fixing up a free energy machine to power their house yet?

[nowaysj]

If you want to be an asshole about it.

[lloydnoise]

So yeah, have we now established that despite this stuff being blindingly simple to do and having been known about for at least a hundred years and there being loads of youtube videos and books (ker-ching) and lectures (ker-ching) and patent applications (ker-ching) where people talk about how to do it, noone's quite got around to fixing up a free energy machine to power their house yet?

still

[hugh]

If energy was free the development gained from it would be exponential and perpetual. There is no way it could be "kept quiet". Also, as an end point, it would enable so much amazing technology that there would be no point in people trying to control power or resources. These resources could be synthesised from free energy at no cost.

[Genevieve]

this is bullshit.


how do i know this?


it has atomospheric pads playing through the lecture.


NO real maths or physics lecture has atmospheric pads.

Word! Where are the distorted 909 kicks and sped-up Amen breaks?

[tacospheros]

Yeah you said that before

because it's totally relevant every time he says it




real question: why do you guys come back to these threads? you already have your preconceived notions of what will happen, and then sure enough you troll the shit out of the threads fulfilling your own prophecy. why don't you acually assume that high ground that you always think you're on and just GTFO already ?

[knell]

probably the same reason you come into these threads taking the "super high ground" by saying that everyone actually talking real science is "trolling"

why do you feel the need, hmm? what's stopping you from GettingTFO?

the video in the OP is blatantly false, i got actual scientists who can actually do math and not just masturbate to youtube videos to prove it, and yet the reply i got was "i said it was nothing new"

doesnt matter if it's nothing new, it's still FALSE.

[tacospheros]

im not talking about the topic of the thread, i'm talking about you and the troll army that come out of the woodwork every time parson posts a thread. you guys literally troll the shit out of his threads and then wonder why he doesn't want to talk to you in a civil manner. i'd have lost patience a long time ago too

[knell]

please inform me as to how i am trolling by pointing out real science as opposed to pseudoscience, and trying to calm down the propagators of nonsense? im not trying to irritate anyone, i just dont like science that's not grounded in fact, and i especially dont like overt arrogance due to some perceived supremacy, especially when the ideas are inherently false. i could care less if someone chooses to remain ignorant, at least i tried to talk sense into them.

you're right, i'd lose patience if i constantly preached delusional pseudoscience and no one believed me too

now, if he had any proof or original thoughts, i'd probably lay off him. and by proof i mean actual tangible evidence, numbers and experiments, actual machines, not old men at UFO conferences

by your logic, i should be able to start nonsense threads and yell at everyone that calls me an asshole because i've lost patience with them "not getting the obvious facts" even in the face of insurmountable evidence against it

[christophera]

knell is at that age where he's going through his arrogant skeptic phase

gonna use words like pseudoscience or junk science, and frequently make requests for peer-reviewed evidence. worshiping at the altar of "science" as if it were some kind of monolithic infallible pillar of ultimate wisdom.

it's almost cute. it's more annoying though.

[WhosZena]

He'll be dead

[christophera]

wat

[knell]

sadly, i'm no longer able to read anything from chris' numerous accounts :[

but i'm sure his reply was tactful and included no insults or arrogance.

parson is not a scientist. parson is not a theoretical physicist. he just has internet access.

[christophera]

lets just wear our issues on our sleeve why don't we

[christophera]

knell used to have a fake parson account and troll as my evil twin or some shit to put this in context. i thought it was herpz till knell confessed.

[christophera]

but back to the topic of spirals

[WhosZena]

"If you have it, let me know" .. possible threat?