WHAT SNEAKERS YOU WEARIN?

Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.

Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
Locked
User avatar
powerpill
Posts: 1570
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: NW London

Post by powerpill » Thu Mar 05, 2009 2:01 pm

Pre-Thought Process wrote:
deamonds wrote:sorry, did i just read the phrase

'air max 95 not the one'

you my friend, are clueless
innit, the stash 95's were badman creps but I couldn't justify the cost.

Just bought these at a much more reasonable £50

Image
are they similar in fit/shape to 90's?

skeem_
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 9:20 pm

Post by skeem_ » Fri Mar 06, 2009 3:57 am

Image

PIMPIN!!! 8)

User avatar
schamotnik
Posts: 717
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 6:43 am
Location: Nanchang, China/Vienna

Post by schamotnik » Fri Mar 06, 2009 5:07 am

deamonds wrote:sorry, did i just read the phrase

'air max 95 not the one'

you my friend, are clueless
haha, no hard feelings.. let's agree to disagree.. I just think they are the ugliest out of the whole air max series..

deamonds
Posts: 11392
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 2:18 pm

Post by deamonds » Fri Mar 06, 2009 8:27 am

Schamotnik wrote:
deamonds wrote:sorry, did i just read the phrase

'air max 95 not the one'

you my friend, are clueless
haha, no hard feelings.. let's agree to disagree.. I just think they are the ugliest out of the whole air max series..
theyre not the best, but certainly not the worst, the air max 1's are defo the ugliest...

the 97's are the best looking for me, or the 90's...what does everyone else think...

User avatar
HamCrescendo
Posts: 3101
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:11 pm
Location: Manchester/London

Post by HamCrescendo » Fri Mar 06, 2009 9:52 am

The suns shining so time to bust out the Londons.
Image

User avatar
schamotnik
Posts: 717
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 6:43 am
Location: Nanchang, China/Vienna

Post by schamotnik » Fri Mar 06, 2009 9:54 am

deamonds wrote:
Schamotnik wrote:
deamonds wrote:sorry, did i just read the phrase

'air max 95 not the one'

you my friend, are clueless
haha, no hard feelings.. let's agree to disagree.. I just think they are the ugliest out of the whole air max series..
theyre not the best, but certainly not the worst, the air max 1's are defo the ugliest...

the 97's are the best looking for me, or the 90's...what does everyone else think...
air max 89-91 for me, mate

User avatar
grimesceneinvestigation
Posts: 776
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 9:23 pm

Post by grimesceneinvestigation » Fri Mar 06, 2009 10:30 am

Image


they look really cool,
but emerica just sucks quality-wise
even if you don't skate with them they're ripped open on the sole after a few weeks, and that's not just my own experience, i heard that from other people aswell

kins83
Posts: 5979
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:31 pm
Location: Leeds

Post by kins83 » Fri Mar 06, 2009 10:51 am

deamonds wrote:
Schamotnik wrote:
deamonds wrote:sorry, did i just read the phrase

'air max 95 not the one'

you my friend, are clueless
haha, no hard feelings.. let's agree to disagree.. I just think they are the ugliest out of the whole air max series..
theyre not the best, but certainly not the worst, the air max 1's are defo the ugliest...

the 97's are the best looking for me, or the 90's...what does everyone else think...
I'd say that the 90s (sweet, sweet 90s) are the best ones, closely followed by 97s in certain colourways.
Magma wrote: SNH is a genuinely necessary part of making sure I don't murder everyone in the building whilst muttering Flow Dan lyrics.
badger wrote:The panda's problem isn't man. The panda's problem is that it's utterly shit

User avatar
pre-thought process
Posts: 1157
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 11:47 pm
Location: amongst the few

Post by pre-thought process » Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:26 pm

kins83 wrote:
deamonds wrote:
Schamotnik wrote:
deamonds wrote:sorry, did i just read the phrase

'air max 95 not the one'

you my friend, are clueless
haha, no hard feelings.. let's agree to disagree.. I just think they are the ugliest out of the whole air max series..
theyre not the best, but certainly not the worst, the air max 1's are defo the ugliest...

the 97's are the best looking for me, or the 90's...what does everyone else think...
I'd say that the 90s (sweet, sweet 90s) are the best ones, closely followed by 97s in certain colourways.
Ha ha, you and the 90's Matt :lol:

Infrared 90's for the muddafukkin win.

I love that they brought the Structures back, especially
Image

Probably gonna get stick but I like the Yeezy's
Image

(the black ones anyway)
strip it down, reveal the elements
Image

User avatar
pre-thought process
Posts: 1157
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 11:47 pm
Location: amongst the few

Post by pre-thought process » Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:06 pm

powerpill wrote:
Pre-Thought Process wrote:
deamonds wrote:sorry, did i just read the phrase

'air max 95 not the one'

you my friend, are clueless
innit, the stash 95's were badman creps but I couldn't justify the cost.

Just bought these at a much more reasonable £50

Image
are they similar in fit/shape to 90's?
I don't find them as snug as 90's, and they feel a little narrower. Might just be my hench toes though :o
strip it down, reveal the elements
Image

User avatar
powerpill
Posts: 1570
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: NW London

Post by powerpill » Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:07 pm

they remind me of those weird boot things you see people who have broken/fucked up legs wearing. dey is uuuuuggglyy

User avatar
magma
Posts: 18810
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Post by magma » Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:09 pm

Am I the only bloke in London that doesn't like high tops?

Nothing's more comfy than a nice pair of DC skate shoes..

User avatar
powerpill
Posts: 1570
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: NW London

Post by powerpill » Fri Mar 06, 2009 1:09 pm

Pre-Thought Process wrote:
powerpill wrote:
Pre-Thought Process wrote:
deamonds wrote:sorry, did i just read the phrase

'air max 95 not the one'

you my friend, are clueless
innit, the stash 95's were badman creps but I couldn't justify the cost.

Just bought these at a much more reasonable £50

Image
are they similar in fit/shape to 90's?
I don't find them as snug as 90's, and they feel a little narrower. Might just be my hench toes though :o
out to the wide foot, hench toe crew

User avatar
DOOMTROOPER/T40
Posts: 964
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:49 pm
Location: Cathedral Of Doom/Margate, Kent
Contact:

Post by DOOMTROOPER/T40 » Sat Mar 07, 2009 1:21 am

GrimeSceneInvestigation wrote:Image


they look really cool,
but emerica just sucks quality-wise
even if you don't skate with them they're ripped open on the sole after a few weeks, and that's not just my own experience, i heard that from other people aswell
:o i want a pair of those, ain't seen them before

User avatar
grimesceneinvestigation
Posts: 776
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 9:23 pm

Post by grimesceneinvestigation » Sat Mar 07, 2009 10:28 am

google "emerica mcnally" :wink:
but as said, the quality is beyond a minimum.

User avatar
Coppola
Posts: 3560
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:03 pm
Location: London

Post by Coppola » Sat Mar 07, 2009 5:02 pm

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/NIKE-AIR-MAX-90-P ... 240%3A1318
should i deal is they stay close to that price?

bright maroon
Posts: 4992
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: ..in high colonial, tropical low country currently - Savannah, Ga

Post by bright maroon » Sat Mar 07, 2009 9:29 pm

this is my newest shoe..and I'm kind of a sad bear because the paint went all crackly after 1 day..luckily I don't get hung up on stuff like that and will just continue to wear them until the whole things are crackly..

I try to be a stylish as cheap gets..

Image

weston
Posts: 764
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 8:21 am
Location: west

Post by weston » Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:06 am

BEN? wrote:http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/NIKE-AIR-MAX-90-P ... 240%3A1318
should i deal is they stay close to that price?
This could be one of those to good to be true moments!?!?

note the zero feedback, that said if they stay at £20, what you got to loose

User avatar
pre-thought process
Posts: 1157
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 11:47 pm
Location: amongst the few

Post by pre-thought process » Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:31 pm

weston wrote:
BEN? wrote:http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/NIKE-AIR-MAX-90-P ... 240%3A1318
should i deal is they stay close to that price?
This could be one of those to good to be true moments!?!?

note the zero feedback, that said if they stay at £20, what you got to loose
I'd be wary, they're not the premium infrared 90's.
strip it down, reveal the elements
Image

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests