gain structure and mixing aka THE MONEYSHOT THREAD
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
All that for one snare... My advice is leave it, it's all part of the art.nowaysj wrote:To my knowledge, you're going to loose something. There's just no way around that. The art is making the loss invisible (audiotorially speaking).
Dep's suggestions are the way, I think.
One thing I haven't heard - what made this audiotrack? Is this the output of a synth or sampler triggered w/ midi? If so reduce the velocity of the snare hit that made that peak.
Also, figure out if anything else is hitting there at the same time, take it out if the snare is what you want to hear.
Manually automate a volume cut right there on that hit.
Then - find the freq of that snare hit, eq the freq down a bit.
Use a good, transparent compressor and automate it - just for that hit - knock it down a few db's.
A little volume adustment, a little eq, and a little compression - again - all just for that hit should tame that peak w/o loosing everything.
But again 2x - you have to loose, no way around that, we're in a zero sum environment.
Oh, don't take that as me knocking your advice, it sounds like brilliant advice...WiREZ wrote:All that for one snare... My advice is leave it, it's all part of the art.nowaysj wrote:To my knowledge, you're going to loose something. There's just no way around that. The art is making the loss invisible (audiotorially speaking).
Dep's suggestions are the way, I think.
One thing I haven't heard - what made this audiotrack? Is this the output of a synth or sampler triggered w/ midi? If so reduce the velocity of the snare hit that made that peak.
Also, figure out if anything else is hitting there at the same time, take it out if the snare is what you want to hear.
Manually automate a volume cut right there on that hit.
Then - find the freq of that snare hit, eq the freq down a bit.
Use a good, transparent compressor and automate it - just for that hit - knock it down a few db's.
A little volume adustment, a little eq, and a little compression - again - all just for that hit should tame that peak w/o loosing everything.
But again 2x - you have to loose, no way around that, we're in a zero sum environment.
I was just stating that, in my opinion, music is an art form, and slight imperfections give character!
it looks fine. seriously. if it sounds good, keep it.Brisance wrote:
Help?
if it doesn't sound good, change it.
if you're worried about the peakiness of it, try some simple L2-ish limiting.
twitter.com/sharmabeats
twitter.com/SubSwara
subswara.com
myspace.com/davesharma
Low Motion Records, Soul Motive, TKG, Daly City, Mercury UK
twitter.com/SubSwara
subswara.com
myspace.com/davesharma
Low Motion Records, Soul Motive, TKG, Daly City, Mercury UK
-
- Posts: 2045
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 9:12 pm
- Location: Portland, OR
- Contact:
oh. my. goodness.
you lot are making my journey into production sooooo much nicer. glad to see that my ideas about not putting too many fx and compression was on the right track. but man....after reading and reading and reading, when i started something new last night and just spaced it properly while i was mixing as i went.....the quality of sound improved tenfold and i still haven't finished a tune yet!
These lessons are invaluable. I'm glad I'm learning this all at once so that I can make sure I'm learning the right way from the start. Then maybe I won't mess up too much after that since the only way I'll be used to will be the right one.

Thanks you guys. From me and my ears, which, I swear, sighed in relief when I put things in their right places.
you lot are making my journey into production sooooo much nicer. glad to see that my ideas about not putting too many fx and compression was on the right track. but man....after reading and reading and reading, when i started something new last night and just spaced it properly while i was mixing as i went.....the quality of sound improved tenfold and i still haven't finished a tune yet!
These lessons are invaluable. I'm glad I'm learning this all at once so that I can make sure I'm learning the right way from the start. Then maybe I won't mess up too much after that since the only way I'll be used to will be the right one.

Thanks you guys. From me and my ears, which, I swear, sighed in relief when I put things in their right places.
My art: http://lacifaeria.deviantart.comMagnetron, Sputtering wrote:I don't really make dubstep. I'm just here for the alpacas.
My tunes: http://www.soundcloud.com/bellybelle
My space: http://www.myspace.com/beelzebeats
My twitter: http://www.twitter.com/lacifaeria
-
- Posts: 1737
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
- Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
- Contact:
Still really glad this is helping people! 

www.scmastering.com / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com
-
- Posts: 1737
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
- Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
- Contact:
Sorry for not answering absolutely everything to your satisfaction nowaysj 
TBH it's getting on to phase issues which are not really related to this sticky. I know I mentioned it earlier in the thread but I didn't know the thread was going to be up here permanently, I was just trying to help a dude out
Now it is here permanently it is better IMO to keep it to what it is about - gain structure - than to branch off and possibly confuse matters for people reading. It's a gain structure thread, not an 'ask Bob' thread. Better to keep it tight and to the point - keep your levels sensible.
Not blowing you off - ask in another thread and I'll see what I can come up with.

TBH it's getting on to phase issues which are not really related to this sticky. I know I mentioned it earlier in the thread but I didn't know the thread was going to be up here permanently, I was just trying to help a dude out

Now it is here permanently it is better IMO to keep it to what it is about - gain structure - than to branch off and possibly confuse matters for people reading. It's a gain structure thread, not an 'ask Bob' thread. Better to keep it tight and to the point - keep your levels sensible.
Not blowing you off - ask in another thread and I'll see what I can come up with.
www.scmastering.com / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com
- eshscramble
- Posts: 922
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 12:42 am
- Location: elkbeats.com
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Left Coast, CA
Drum Kit Gain Construction
As an example for gain construction before the drums hit the main mix
I've tried
Kick = -9db
Snare = -16db
Hats = -25db
This gives me about -9db
What are people thoughts on the matter?
I've tried
Kick = -9db
Snare = -16db
Hats = -25db
This gives me about -9db
What are people thoughts on the matter?
-
- Posts: 1737
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
- Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
- Contact:
Hello there 
So the drums are peaking at just over -9? Sounds about right to me
How do they sound?

So the drums are peaking at just over -9? Sounds about right to me

How do they sound?
www.scmastering.com / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com
Drum Kit Gain Construction Part 2
Not that bad, if you forget the out of tune kick and the funny snare but i think the basics of the gain construction theory are there and working.
I've added some sub bass about 2db beneath the drums and well here's the link to have a listen.
I think i would have more sub bass in there. Thats me tho,
Part 1 is a example boosted to about 0db >!naughty!<
? Is this what some people would do before playing out pre mastered?
http://www.divshare.com/download/7407055-8de
Part 2 is a example reaching about -7db
http://www.divshare.com/download/7407056-7d5

PS Ranting is good for the soul
I've added some sub bass about 2db beneath the drums and well here's the link to have a listen.
I think i would have more sub bass in there. Thats me tho,
Part 1 is a example boosted to about 0db >!naughty!<
? Is this what some people would do before playing out pre mastered?
http://www.divshare.com/download/7407055-8de
Part 2 is a example reaching about -7db
http://www.divshare.com/download/7407056-7d5




PS Ranting is good for the soul
-
- Posts: 2045
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 9:12 pm
- Location: Portland, OR
- Contact:
please pardon the question if its been beaten to death here. i honestly did check the search option to solve this question and perhaps I'm not sure of what I should be looking for or not...
posting in this forum is at times very intimidating...
my question is this: I'm doing some experimentation with using samples as notes and building from there. I have a personal goal that I'd like to work at, that all of the notes are sampled from previous recordings--then recombined into a new track. Ok so.....if this is the case, should I need to eq the piece that heavily if i either don't use any reverb or anything like that, or, at the most, might be pitching a sample up or down a little bit?
I'm really sorry if this has been asked. I did a search for samples and I found a lot of really great links. Same with checking the production bible. Lots of good links....but maybe if it was answered before, thats why I missed it.

posting in this forum is at times very intimidating...
my question is this: I'm doing some experimentation with using samples as notes and building from there. I have a personal goal that I'd like to work at, that all of the notes are sampled from previous recordings--then recombined into a new track. Ok so.....if this is the case, should I need to eq the piece that heavily if i either don't use any reverb or anything like that, or, at the most, might be pitching a sample up or down a little bit?
I'm really sorry if this has been asked. I did a search for samples and I found a lot of really great links. Same with checking the production bible. Lots of good links....but maybe if it was answered before, thats why I missed it.

My art: http://lacifaeria.deviantart.comMagnetron, Sputtering wrote:I don't really make dubstep. I'm just here for the alpacas.
My tunes: http://www.soundcloud.com/bellybelle
My space: http://www.myspace.com/beelzebeats
My twitter: http://www.twitter.com/lacifaeria
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests