Geey wrote:cant we all just go back to 2003 and pretend this all never happened?

Geey wrote:cant we all just go back to 2003 and pretend this all never happened?
TopManLurka wrote:^i hear u don, at least you can form an opinion doe.
/
everything i said was relevant and true, l0l @ the people shooting me down and not even bothering to address what i've said. minor, carry on with this mindset towards the stuff you're pushing.
'silly questions and stupid statements' uno, not sure whether this is a forum or not. get more of a discussion off dissensus or gf than on here.
ur a closet fan that's coolTopManLurka wrote:as much as i don't understand why feelings are caught at the term 'dark-130'. lululu.
yet another pointless post from someone.
Yeah that ITCH homophobe.. Man needs to sort it out and make trap or somethingLye Form wrote:Yeah some guy.. "Itchy" or something.Etches828 wrote:Epoch's jus that dancefloor vampire that'll suck the blood out of any genre and spit it back out in some flurry of evilness![]()
I hear theres some twat turning jungle down 30bpm thinking its new.
it's more the ppl trying to pass it off as something new or getting aggy (as we've seen itt) when some-one gives it a term.DeniedExistence wrote:it is very similar in style to old school grime and dubstep but I don't know why people are seeing this as a bad thing?
please dont cut quotes out of my posts to make them look entirely out of context please.Muncey wrote:Geey wrote:cant we all just go back to 2003 and pretend this all never happened?
Fair enough, I can see where you're coming from. A lot of this stuff could easily fit in with a selection of old school grime/dubstep stuff, though obviously the tempo and production have a more modern vibe... I don't think marketing it as something new is necessarily a negative though, if it encourages more producers to come on a similar dark and raw tip then I'm all for it. Most of the housey/garagey stuff I mentioned earlier that's taken over atm definitely isn't exactly a progressive or new style of music and that's become hugely popular and is developing purely because a lot of people are encountering it for the first time having been too young to rave to the original sounds... I like some of that stuff but I much prefer the dark grimey sound, I'm only 21 (same age as Wen actually I think) so I was much too young to take advantage of the original underground dubstep/grime/sublow stuff, I love it when DJs drop those tunes in clubs but I'm also conscious that now that the old tunes are now seen as an old school sound by many people rather than how they was originally seen as very forward thinking and new... So the idea of a modern take on that grimey music is something that makes me very happy as a music fan and a club goer, already loving the resurgence in grimier sounds that Butterz and Harddrive and the like have been pushing but it can definitely be taken much further (Elijah seems to have the same thoughts inviting Wen onto the Butterz Rinse show for a guest mix recently). Sorry I'm tired so this post is a bit rambling but hopefully you can see what I'm driving at.TopManLurka wrote:it's more the ppl trying to pass it off as something new or getting aggy (as we've seen itt) when some-one gives it a term.DeniedExistence wrote:it is very similar in style to old school grime and dubstep but I don't know why people are seeing this as a bad thing?
(when rly it is just the two genres you mentioned anyway.)
Cool, you like grime, evidently so. My only qualms with what certain man are trying to do is that both grime and dubstep are on its last leg (grime even more so) and yet it seems like ppl think they're pushing something new just because it's being made at that 130 mark. Take a day off, you're fooling no-one and just hindering those original sounds aforementioned in the process. Ppl would understand what I mean if they actually read my posts itt. I'll just leave this here again doe...DeniedExistence wrote:Fair enough, I can see where you're coming from. A lot of this stuff could easily fit in with a selection of old school grime/dubstep stuff, though obviously the tempo and production have a more modern vibe... I don't think marketing it as something new is necessarily a negative though, if it encourages more producers to come on a similar dark and raw tip then I'm all for it. Most of the housey/garagey stuff I mentioned earlier that's taken over atm definitely isn't exactly a progressive or new style of music and that's become hugely popular and is developing purely because a lot of people are encountering it for the first time having been too young to rave to the original sounds... I like some of that stuff but I much prefer the dark grimey sound, I'm only 21 (same age as Wen actually I think) so I was much too young to take advantage of the original underground dubstep/grime/sublow stuff, I love it when DJs drop those tunes in clubs but I'm also conscious that now that the old tunes are now seen as an old school sound by many people rather than how they was originally seen as very forward thinking and new... So the idea of a modern take on that grimey music is something that makes me very happy as a music fan and a club goer, already loving the resurgence in grimier sounds that Butterz and Harddrive and the like have been pushing but it can definitely be taken much further (Elijah seems to have the same thoughts inviting Wen onto the Butterz Rinse show for a guest mix recently). Sorry I'm tired so this post is a bit rambling but hopefully you can see what I'm driving at.TopManLurka wrote:it's more the ppl trying to pass it off as something new or getting aggy (as we've seen itt) when some-one gives it a term.DeniedExistence wrote:it is very similar in style to old school grime and dubstep but I don't know why people are seeing this as a bad thing?
(when rly it is just the two genres you mentioned anyway.)
TopManLurka wrote:Wen - Spark It
Mondie - Straight
d double wrote:that's very original, never heard that from another individual
fractal wrote:you wouldn't need to ask silly questions and make stupid statements in this thread
flashharry wrote:sorry, i can't understand why you're summoning us to respond to your waffle.
Wolf89 wrote:I'm bit a hipster is the point
wub wrote:Bob Dylan is not Grime.
Yes, it's music that they like to play, and I'm with you on the influences. But don't you think it's important that these sounds now fit into one coherent set? Blackdown has talked about how, in the past, their DJ sets would be much more segmented. Whereas in the past they might have had separate grime, dubstep etc. sections in their mixes, now all of these disparate influences seem to be coming together to form something with a bit more coherence.Lye Form wrote:Seems like everyone is over thinking it.
Basically its a bunch of people writing music they want to taking influences from whatever they like & linked by it being music dusk and blackdown like to play. influences are all over the place, Wen largely from grime, Epoch from dubstep, Sully from 2step and jungle, E.M.MA from Microsoft Encarta ’96....
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests