"The Most Creative Dubstep Track Ever" ...Better than BENGA

[adam_misst]

oh and your tune reeks by the way. Bassline is pathetic and the mixdown is dreadful. You are no Benga, at all.

[yecnuahc]

F'

wrong start here...

You need to grow up a bit young boy...

Too much listening of your own track without listening to others with a good criticisem point of view could make you fail on juging your effort correctly... i think this is what have happen here.

Too much typing criticism without studying proper english could make you fail in articulating yourself correctly... I think this is what HAS HAPPENED here.

[yecnuahc]

oh and your tune reeks by the way. Bassline is pathetic and the mixdown is dreadful. You are no Benga, at all.

LMFAO....speaking of dreadful music. "Seahorse" sounds like you made that with you ass cheeks. YOu are in not place to talk about reeking music. LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[♫♪♫]

How many accounts are you gonna make to try and push your shit music on this board?

[bandshell]

you're being trolled guys.

[philT]

[krease]

10 /10 for arrogance.

tune is only 3/10 at a push tho im affraid

[kraftpeanutbutterbear]

Too much typing criticism without studying proper english could make you fail in articulating yourself correctly... I think this is what HAS HAPPENED here.

ok
This is a place where everybody from the world could listen to your track (i'm french, excuse my bad english) and you just piss on every regular guyz from the site and talk shit since your here... look how many download you got since you've posted here. look how good criticism you've got. you seams to got under 15 years old with your pre-teen attitude. Folr me, you only worth a ban from this site... I surelly not use your track for my monthly mix.

grow up my son, one day you'll be a man


KraftP->

PS: you're not the first clown i've seen on this site but you're surelly one of the most imature and arrogant i've seen.

[djerkov]

He might be joking guys!

It's an ok track, not original though, and I'm willing to bet it would hurt when played over a big system!

[fuzz_2k]

you're being trolled guys.

[kraftpeanutbutterbear]

He might be joking guys!

It's an ok track, not original though, and I'm willing to bet it would hurt when played over a big system!

if he is joking, he have to stop right now because he don't make laugh anybody. to much self-estime right here.

if you're better than Benga, good luck for your album.

[billuf]

ego

[gravious]

Please give me any kind of feed back.

In the serious play of questions and answers, in the work of reciprocal elucidation, the rights of each person are in some sense immanent in the discussion. They depend only on the dialogue situation. The person asking the questions is merely exercising the right that has been given him: to remain unconvinced, to perceive a contradiction, to require more information, to emphasize different postulates, to point out faulty reasoning, and so on. As for the person answering the questions, he too exercises a right that does not go beyond the discussion itself; by the logic of his own discourse, he is tied to what he has said earlier, and by the acceptance of dialogue he is tied to the questioning of other. Questions and answers depend on a game—a game that is at once pleasant and difficult—in which each of the two partners takes pains to use only the rights given him by the other and by the accepted form of dialogue.

The polemicist , on the other hand, proceeds encased in privileges that he possesses in advance and will never agree to question. On principle, he possesses rights authorizing him to wage war and making that struggle a just undertaking; the person he confronts is not a partner in search for the truth but an adversary, an enemy who is wrong, who is armful, and whose very existence constitutes a threat. For him, then the game consists not of recognizing this person as a subject having the right to speak but of abolishing him as interlocutor, from any possible dialogue; and his final objective will be not to come as close as possible to a difficult truth but to bring about the triumph of the just cause he has been manifestly upholding from the beginning. The polemicist relies on a legitimacy that his adversary is by definition denied.

Perhaps, someday, a long history will have to be written of polemics, polemics as a parasitic figure on discussion and an obstacle to the search for the truth. Very schematically, it seems to me that today we can recognize the presence in polemics of three models: the religious model, the judiciary model, and the political model. As in heresiology, polemics sets itself the task of determining the intangible point of dogma, the fundamental and necessary principle that the adversary has neglected, ignored or transgressed; and it denounces this negligence as a moral failing; at the root of the error, it finds passion, desire, interest, a whole series of weaknesses and inadmissible attachments that establish it as culpable. As in judiciary practice, polemics allows for no possibility of an equal discussion: it examines a case; it isn’t dealing with an interlocutor, it is processing a suspect; it collects the proofs of his guilt, designates the infraction he has committed, and pronounces the verdict and sentences him. In any case, what we have here is not on the order of a shared investigation; the polemicist tells the truth in the form of his judgment and by virtue of the authority he has conferred on himself. But it is the political model that is the most powerful today. Polemics defines alliances, recruits partisans, unites interests or opinions, represents a party; it establishes the other as an enemy, an upholder of opposed interests against which one must fight until the moment this enemy is defeated and either surrenders or disappears.

Of course, the reactivation, in polemics, of these political, judiciary, or religious practices is nothing more than theater. One gesticulates: anathemas, excommunications, condemnations, battles, victories, and defeats are no more than ways of speaking, after all. And yet, in the order of discourse, they are also ways of acting which are not without consequence. There are the sterilizing effects. Has anyone ever seen a new idea come out of a polemic? And how could it be otherwise, given that here the interlocutors are incited not to advance, not to take more and more risks in what they say, but to fall back continually on the rights that they claim, on their legitimacy, which they must defend, and on the affirmation of their innocence? There is something even more serious here: in this comedy, one mimics war, battles, annihilations, or unconditional surrenders, putting forward as much of one’s killer instinct as possible. But it is really dangerous to make anyone believe that he can gain access to the truth by such paths and thus to validate, even if in a merely symbolic form, the real political practices that could be warranted by it. Let us imagine, for a moment, that a magic wand is waved and one of the two adversaries in a polemic is given the ability to exercise all the power he likes over the other. One doesn’t even have to imagine it: one has only to look at what happened during the debate in the USSR over linguistics or genetics not long ago. Were these merely aberrant deviations from what was supposed to be the correct discussion? Not at all—they were the real consequences of a polemic attitude whose effects ordinarily remain suspended.

Hope this helps

[yecnuahc]

is it better than benga?

[BARE SKYLLS]

Pretty Average ... Ok tune ... mastering needs some work, as do alot of tracks upped here ... thats cool, but not when your claiming, what you are.
I don't dislike the track, ... Hip Hop undertones ... but I've had much better, today!!
"Keep On, Keepin' On" ... Tone Down The Hype!
Benga's got dub's in his box, that would Slap The Shit Out of You ... Real Talk

[stappard]

i like it

[djdickclark]

sounds like hiphop with a wobble. needs maaaaajor mixdown work and then i think it'd be pretty tight. creative? sure. but check out LeBelge for your own sake.

LebelgeElectrod is tight but heavily overproduced imo.

dude, srsly?

just cuz ppl knock a shit tune of yours, it doesnt mean you need to talk down on who they reference you to.
we're just trying to give an example of what good music is, as it seems you havent heard any in a while.... or ever for that matter.

it would better you, or your sound at least, to listen to the advice given.
do you think so many ppl would just make up some shit like this?

if you ever wanna write decent music, you'll find it helpful to take a step back from what you're working on, and look at it from a "third person" perspective.
get over the mentality of, "well it's super badass cuz EYE wrote it"

you know why?









cuz it's not

[ellis clavane]

dont like it

[purist]

the tune is ok
not the most creative tune but not bad
dunno why everyone's hatin it so much

[icebagg]

how can you compare yourself to benga? im not gonna hate, but if its better than benga, how come benga is a world famous dj and your just some guy on a forum?? take homeys advice and slap yourself for me