Comparing less mentioned DAWS

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
User avatar
ruckus49
Posts: 1150
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 2:40 am

Re: Comparing less mentioned DAWS

Post by ruckus49 » Sat Dec 12, 2009 10:02 pm

hcstnfrd wrote:I'd have to say right now Cubase is a godsend imho. And I do do more than just electronic music, so it's right up my alley. The sound editing tools are awesome and just about everything I've so far learned/used in it has put a smile on my face. I'm happy, please don't have a DAW war, I was merely asking for suggestions, not attacks at certains DAWs. I've tried the Live demo and while it was good in it's own right, I enjoyed my friend's copy of Cubase a whole lot more.

what else is good about it besides sound editing? im interested, im not hating on it.

User avatar
crytek
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: H-Town

Re: Comparing less mentioned DAWS

Post by crytek » Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:31 pm

DZA wrote:
Project EX wrote:changing DAW will not make you producing better tunes
WRONG!!!!

Actually, he's right.
Azair wrote:...equipment doesn't determine the quality of the tunes, because the creativity of mind can never be programmed by a computer.

Time is running...
|

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests