Ugh, that makes it even worse, didn't even notice that.Project EX wrote:Neptune is records new feature, not sure if reason 5 will get it as wellkaiori breathe wrote:I haven't decided what I'm doing Re: Reason 5 yet, Neptune looks pretty good to me. Definitely what I was hoping for in Reason 5, but I feel a bit let down because that seems to be all we're getting.
Boycott on Propellerheads software
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
- kaiori breathe
- Posts: 1715
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 12:26 am
- Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland
- Contact:
Re: Boycott on Propellerheads software
Re: Boycott on Propellerheads software
just checked it for you, it indeed comes only with record. It's said in the vid and also at the end of the 1st paragraph below the vidkaiori breathe wrote:Ugh, that makes it even worse, didn't even notice that.Project EX wrote:Neptune is records new feature, not sure if reason 5 will get it as wellkaiori breathe wrote:I haven't decided what I'm doing Re: Reason 5 yet, Neptune looks pretty good to me. Definitely what I was hoping for in Reason 5, but I feel a bit let down because that seems to be all we're getting.
http://www.propellerheads.se/reason5/in ... le=neptune
-
cloak and dagger
- Posts: 1146
- Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 12:09 pm
- Location: Sittin' on the curb debatin' how to get it percolatin'
- Contact:
Re: Boycott on Propellerheads software
static_cast wrote:Uh, am I missing something here? I mean, I think Reason's pretty shit anyway, but that's beside the point. If you don't think it's good (anymore), why don't you just switch to something else and leave it at that?
I'm not sure how a lacklustre product and infrequent updates really warrants demanding a public boycott. Usually you call for a public boycott in response to outrageously offensive conduct on the part of a company or organisation, not because you think their main offering is a bit rubbish.
Yeah, I'm guessing by "boycott" he means "not purchase this particular product?"
But considering he didn't purchase their products before, it's still a bit confusing.
- back2onett
- Posts: 893
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 3:47 pm
- Location: Brizzle
Re: Boycott on Propellerheads software
I think the boycott's about Propellerheads not listening to customers not Propellerheads making shitty software
How does I wobbled bass?
-
bonezmccoy
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 9:35 am
- Location: Paris
- Contact:
Re: Boycott on Propellerheads software
I think the boycott is about Propellerheads not listening to him and making the software he wants.
Re: Boycott on Propellerheads software
lol@making account for that.!!CHEAbonezmccoy wrote:I think the boycott is about Propellerheads not listening to him and making the software he wants.
paravrais wrote:It genuinely was a couple of years before I realised it was pronounced re-noise not ren-wah
-
pirate exposer
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 6:51 pm
- Location: liberty city, miami
Re: Boycott on Propellerheads software
kejk wrote:lol@making account for that.!!CHEAbonezmccoy wrote:I think the boycott is about Propellerheads not listening to him and making the software he wants.
bonezmccoy
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 10:35 am
Re: Boycott on Propellerheads software
That's what I mean!!cheapirate exposer wrote:kejk wrote:lol@making account for that.!!CHEAbonezmccoy wrote:I think the boycott is about Propellerheads not listening to him and making the software he wants.
bonezmccoy
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 10:35 am
He sees futures and shit!!chea
paravrais wrote:It genuinely was a couple of years before I realised it was pronounced re-noise not ren-wah
Re: Boycott on Propellerheads software
kejk wrote:That's what I mean!!cheapirate exposer wrote:kejk wrote:lol@making account for that.!!CHEAbonezmccoy wrote:I think the boycott is about Propellerheads not listening to him and making the software he wants.
bonezmccoy
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 10:35 am
He sees futures and shit!!chea
Re: Boycott on Propellerheads software
Reason should have kept everything the same as it was in 2.5
if they had done this and worked out a way to incorporate Audio support within the 2.5 interface the programe would be ace
incorporating VST support wouldnt be an issue if their Native mix tools were better
if they had done this and worked out a way to incorporate Audio support within the 2.5 interface the programe would be ace
incorporating VST support wouldnt be an issue if their Native mix tools were better
Re: Boycott on Propellerheads software
No combinators? lol...diagrams wrote:Reason should have kept everything the same as it was in 2.5
if they had done this and worked out a way to incorporate Audio support within the 2.5 interface the programe would be ace
incorporating VST support wouldnt be an issue if their Native mix tools were better
paravrais wrote:It genuinely was a couple of years before I realised it was pronounced re-noise not ren-wah
Re: Boycott on Propellerheads software
no mclass processors?kejk wrote:No combinators? lol...diagrams wrote:Reason should have kept everything the same as it was in 2.5
if they had done this and worked out a way to incorporate Audio support within the 2.5 interface the programe would be ace
incorporating VST support wouldnt be an issue if their Native mix tools were better
Re: Boycott on Propellerheads software
what about combinators?Project EX wrote:no mclass processors?kejk wrote:No combinators? lol...diagrams wrote:Reason should have kept everything the same as it was in 2.5
if they had done this and worked out a way to incorporate Audio support within the 2.5 interface the programe would be ace
incorporating VST support wouldnt be an issue if their Native mix tools were better
what about mclass processors?
both pointless upgrades that didnt address any meaningfull issues
mclass stuff still sounds below par
- futures_untold
- Posts: 4429
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:25 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Boycott on Propellerheads software
Lol, but Ihave to disagree! 
The MClass stereo imager is the only hipass filter available for other untis to be wired through.
The combinator makes possible many patches that couldn't be achieved otherwise. It also allows for controls with no CV inputs to be modulated by the LFOs on Malstrom etc.
So I agree with your initial statement, but incorporating all the new units that have been introduced since v2.5 innit
Pat
The MClass stereo imager is the only hipass filter available for other untis to be wired through.
The combinator makes possible many patches that couldn't be achieved otherwise. It also allows for controls with no CV inputs to be modulated by the LFOs on Malstrom etc.
So I agree with your initial statement, but incorporating all the new units that have been introduced since v2.5 innit
Pat
Re: Boycott on Propellerheads software
The combinator pointless? It's programmer makes it possible to make very advanced patches, which wouldn't be possible without!
- tripaddict
- Posts: 2417
- Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:53 pm
- Location: Midlands, UK
- Contact:
Re: Boycott on Propellerheads software
actually there is nothing you could do in a combinator you couldnt do without, its just alot harder and automation wise harderProject EX wrote:The combinator pointless? It's programmer makes it possible to make very advanced patches, which wouldn't be possible without!
I<3 combinator
[Ultragore // Tuff Love // Mass Execu7ion // Lick The Wraps // BassPunch // Stupid Fly // Savory Audio // Olympik]
http://www.soundcloud.com/decree
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Decree-Du ... 9471657067
http://www.myspace.com/decreedubstep
http://www.flightrecordings.com
http://www.creative-intentions.com
http://www.soundcloud.com/decree
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Decree-Du ... 9471657067
http://www.myspace.com/decreedubstep
http://www.flightrecordings.com
http://www.creative-intentions.com
Re: Boycott on Propellerheads software
true, makes it so much easierdecree wrote:actually there is nothing you could do in a combinator you couldnt do without, its just alot harder and automation wise harderProject EX wrote:The combinator pointless? It's programmer makes it possible to make very advanced patches, which wouldn't be possible without!
I<3 combinator
Re: Boycott on Propellerheads software
Interesting stuff. When i first seen the update for Reason 5, i was highly impressed because i have long wanted a update, tho i found this could when i seen the blocks features, which i think is quite good. However, the Dr octorex player was not my thing, its does not apply to what i need to do in reason, along with Neptune, and much of the sampling new stuff, although this should be good. Am keen on getting onto the Kong, and some of the new routing functions.
However, the weight for the non- beneficial for me as a reason user, to the new updates are small in comparison to the benefits. Although i can see the new updates helping alot of other Reason users out there. I was hoping for more comprehensive updates to the software. E.g updates to sound engine, updates to the dynamical processes in reason, i would have loved a logic type EQ. etc
But with all that say, the workflow is better then any others, along with Reason's interface. So yes am i kind of disappointed but i seen have my reason AND 4.
However, the weight for the non- beneficial for me as a reason user, to the new updates are small in comparison to the benefits. Although i can see the new updates helping alot of other Reason users out there. I was hoping for more comprehensive updates to the software. E.g updates to sound engine, updates to the dynamical processes in reason, i would have loved a logic type EQ. etc
But with all that say, the workflow is better then any others, along with Reason's interface. So yes am i kind of disappointed but i seen have my reason AND 4.
Re: Boycott on Propellerheads software
This is just not true.decree wrote:actually there is nothing you could do in a combinator you couldnt do without, its just alot harder and automation wise harderProject EX wrote:The combinator pointless? It's programmer makes it possible to make very advanced patches, which wouldn't be possible without!
I<3 combinator
How can you assign 25 different modulations (with custom values) to 1 knob without a combinator?
paravrais wrote:It genuinely was a couple of years before I realised it was pronounced re-noise not ren-wah
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
