Jah War- The Bug feat. Flowdan (Loefah remix)

debate, appreciation, interviews, reviews (events or releases), videos, radio shows
User avatar
Krumb
Posts: 398
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 12:23 pm
Location: naaarwidge

Post by Krumb » Wed Feb 14, 2007 2:56 pm

i read 2nd april

adruu
Posts: 587
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 1:59 am
Location: desert skyscraper

Post by adruu » Wed Feb 14, 2007 3:14 pm

I dont really feel it.

Am I the only one that thinks the original of this one is better? If there was one track that was completely headbuckingly energetic, and DIDNT need to be half-ed down it was it.

User avatar
ory
Posts: 1429
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 2:50 pm

Post by ory » Wed Feb 14, 2007 3:20 pm

.
Last edited by ory on Thu Mar 29, 2012 10:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

ufo over easy
Posts: 4589
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 12:27 am

Post by ufo over easy » Wed Feb 14, 2007 3:27 pm

I love 'em both :) The contrast between loefah's beat and flowdans vocal is fantastic in the remix, and loefah's vocal edits are sick. The original is just pure energy. Different tunes for different times..
:d:

User avatar
sand leaper
Posts: 550
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 5:08 pm
Location: where Brooklyn at

Post by sand leaper » Wed Feb 14, 2007 3:32 pm

ADRUU wrote:I dont really feel it.

Am I the only one that thinks the original of this one is better? If there was one track that was completely headbuckingly energetic, and DIDNT need to be half-ed down it was it.
Definitely agree here, the original is great the way it is. I honestly don't see how any club related remixes can bring anything new to the table with this, particularly not a typical halfstep minimalist-makeover that Loefah has done so many times already.

User avatar
boomnoise
Posts: 6298
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 10:56 am
Location: SE15
Contact:

Post by boomnoise » Wed Feb 14, 2007 3:41 pm

UFO over easy wrote:I love 'em both :) The contrast between loefah's beat and flowdans vocal is fantastic in the remix, and loefah's vocal edits are sick. The original is just pure energy. Different tunes for different times..
at first the remix didn't get me. nor me it. but after hearing it out and loud many times i've grown to love it. exactly how you say ben.

digital
Posts: 746
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 2:54 pm

Post by digital » Wed Feb 14, 2007 3:56 pm

Sand Leaper wrote:Definitely agree here, the original is great the way it is. I honestly don't see how any club related remixes can bring anything new to the table with this, particularly not a typical halfstep minimalist-makeover that Loefah has done so many times already.
:H:

Remix is sick, absolutely goes off at fwd.

Not understanding the criticism on this. :?

Club related remix what? It aint about any of that mate, it's just how Loefah thinks he can make a good tune even better. That's what a remix is.

narkotik
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: Leeds

Post by narkotik » Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:10 pm

Plasticman wrote:Easily my favourite track at the moment.

Perfect for the person who likes their grimy dubstep!
yea, bad tune went off proper at the fix up on friday
Gwan leeds massive

User avatar
pdomino
Posts: 5643
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 2:54 pm

Post by pdomino » Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:15 pm

DIRTY wrote:hopefully get a release on bleep

adruu
Posts: 587
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 1:59 am
Location: desert skyscraper

Post by adruu » Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:18 pm

dunno, caught it on the 1xtra four hour thing and it just didnt grab me like the original did. tis probably a club thing...

we eat our young
Posts: 319
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 11:23 am
Contact:

Post by we eat our young » Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:42 pm

The first time i heard the Loefah mix loud i knew it was a killer.

Nice to have 2 different styles on one 12

Looking forward to getting it on my own turntables

corpsey
Posts: 5995
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 2:16 am

Post by corpsey » Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:46 pm

Tune is big out, sounds fucking jank on my PC though just like every other Loefah tune

User avatar
sand leaper
Posts: 550
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 5:08 pm
Location: where Brooklyn at

Post by sand leaper » Wed Feb 14, 2007 5:00 pm

Digital wrote: Club related remix what? It aint about any of that mate, it's just how Loefah thinks he can make a good tune even better. That's what a remix is.
By "club related" I mean remixes that are meant for the dance, as I think there is little to no potential left for a remix catering to the dance when the original is as good as it is (I remember the original got three rewinds on Kode9's FWD podcast last year).

Obviously, I disagree with Loefah on this kind of makeover making the tune better. And, just in case: the first time I ever heard this was at Warrior Dubz last year, didn't like it then either.

digital
Posts: 746
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 2:54 pm

Post by digital » Wed Feb 14, 2007 5:09 pm

I know what you meant.

So what you're saying is if a tune gets 3 rewinds +, it shouldn't get remixed? Ha. Isn't the majority of dubstep catered for the dance?

Heavy remixes of already shower tunes:
Rutten
Third Choice
Request Line
Avenger
Splurt
Punisher...to name a few.

forensix (mcr)
Posts: 4688
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 1:58 pm
Location: Manchester
Contact:

Post by forensix (mcr) » Wed Feb 14, 2007 5:14 pm

Digital wrote:I know what you meant.

So what you're saying is if a tune gets 3 rewinds +, it shouldn't get remixed? Ha. Isn't the majority of dubstep catered for the dance?

Heavy remixes of already shower tunes:
Rutten
Third Choice
Request Line
Avenger
Splurt
Punisher...to name a few.
youve got a difference of opinion, let it go man, people are allowed to like different stuff

User avatar
sand leaper
Posts: 550
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 5:08 pm
Location: where Brooklyn at

Post by sand leaper » Wed Feb 14, 2007 5:38 pm

Digital wrote: So what you're saying is if a tune gets 3 rewinds +, it shouldn't get remixed?
Yeah, that was exactly what I meant. :roll: I was merely making a reminiscing remark similar to your "This remix is sick, it goes off at FWD"-remark.

And so what if the majority of dubstep is catering to the dance? That should just be all the more incentive for producers to take a completely different approach if you ask me.

digital
Posts: 746
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 2:54 pm

Post by digital » Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:12 pm

Sand Leaper wrote:
Digital wrote: So what you're saying is if a tune gets 3 rewinds +, it shouldn't get remixed?
Yeah, that was exactly what I meant. :roll: I was merely making a reminiscing remark similar to your "This remix is sick, it goes off at FWD"-remark.

And so what if the majority of dubstep is catering to the dance? That should just be all the more incentive for producers to take a completely different approach if you ask me.
Yeah ok then, nice one.

User avatar
frodo
Posts: 1960
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 9:51 pm
Location: Reykjavík / London / Perth
Contact:

Post by frodo » Thu Feb 15, 2007 12:36 am

Brap! I like this 8)

sdm
Posts: 180
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 7:39 pm
Location: Southsea, UK
Contact:

Post by sdm » Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:37 am

Heavy, where can I get it! :D

User avatar
pdomino
Posts: 5643
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 2:54 pm

Post by pdomino » Thu Feb 15, 2007 1:19 pm

Think its played on the Forward @ The End snippet on YouTube.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests