Those comments are pretty standard man, a lot of guitarists think like that, when I was about 16 I thought like that too, most of them grow out of it and realize that musical elitism is dumb-ass.
The ones who don't? ...
In fairness I've probably said some ridiculous shit about production at some point recently.
felixWBO wrote:many dubstep producers do seem content to have only 2 actual 'parts' to a song, copy and pasted and slightly varied. which is all gravy, dubstep's about rhythm 'n groove- it's not classical music. but it's only a matter of time before the majority of dubstep producers will have to come up with more varied structures. ... coming from a prog-metal background
I would expect that if you do come from a background like that you would be pretty familiar with the concept of minimalism (
where you do as much with one or two small musical ideas as you can) a concept which saturates the very roots of dubstep. I rarely use more than ONE idea in a track (
click my sig for an example), I could write something infinitely more complex, but I don't want to, it's far more exciting and challenging to make a quality tune built around one solid idea that can hold it's own for three minutes than it is to come up with a track that changes every 5 seconds and using crazy time signatures and unconventional harmonies. If I gave myself that kind of freedom I'd be writing a tune nearly every day.
You can't escape the influence of minimalism in dubstep, it saturated the early stuff and so now it is consistently present and established as a norm - new writers do it without even realizing when they try to emulate their favorite producers. Not only that, but new artists entering into dubstep are experimenting far more than you or some others in this thread seem to give them credit for. Dubstep as a genre is inherently experimental.
felixWBO wrote:if you have odd time-signatures (never heard it in dubstep personally, link me up if you've heard an example though!)
Hurtdeer from this very forum.
felixWBO wrote:maybe fully progressive/avant-garde dubstep is yet to become a fully-established, bona fide genre?
You're not looking hard enough.
Considering that avant garde concepts are at the very heart of electonic music, and dubstep, and that avant garde composers such as, Pierre Schaeffer, Karlheinz Stockhausen, Iannis Xenakis, Steve Reich, Philip Glass, John Cage, Charles Ives...etc
*, influenced and continue to influence the proponents of electronic music it becomes a bit of a farse when you try claiming it isn't already avant-garde or progessive.
*The fact that when I post this very few people here will struggle with those names and most will be familiar with at least one of them is further evidence supporting my point.
(God don't let me down production forum...)