Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.

Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
deadly_habit
Posts: 22980
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
Location: MURRICA

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by deadly_habit » Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:59 am

its just script kiddies with twitter
no real hacking has even come close to being done

User avatar
collige
Posts: 6316
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 4:50 am
Location: Maryland
Contact:

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by collige » Fri Jun 17, 2011 5:09 am

deadly habit wrote:lulzsec is why encylopediadramatica changed domains
Encyclopediadramatica changed domains because Girlvinyl (the owner) decided to turn it into some retarded SFW Web 2.0 shit and closed down the original site. People got copies of the articles and rebuilt it.
Statement of Intent VIP / Sahaquiel v4 single out now on UK Trends.
Soundcloud
Soundcloud | Bandcamp | Mixcloud | Twitter

wolf89
Posts: 10287
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:18 pm

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by wolf89 » Fri Jun 17, 2011 5:12 am

this all seems kind of silly

User avatar
legend4ry
Posts: 10589
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:56 am
Location: Woolwich

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by legend4ry » Fri Jun 17, 2011 5:29 am

I was so peev'd when minecraft went down haha.
Soulstep wrote: My point is i just wanna hear more vibes
Soundcloud

User avatar
wormcode
Posts: 6659
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:43 am
Location: htx/atx

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by wormcode » Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:13 am

ED was a source of cancer anyway...

Fallout 3 was great, but yes it could have been so much better. New Vegas removed some stuff I really liked about Fallout 3, like I noticed karma is useless now, ammo has weight. That would be cool if it were an option. It might be an option though, maybe I chose a different mode. I didn't play through the whole game because of early bugs, but I plan to.
I still haven't played through all the F3 expansions, only Operation Anchorage.
Last edited by wormcode on Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:22 am, edited 2 times in total.

knell
Secret Ninja Moderator
Posts: 8752
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:51 pm
Location: ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A
Contact:

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by knell » Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:16 am

deadly habit wrote:its just script kiddies with twitter
no real hacking has even come close to being done
arrogant script kiddies who have no idea of responsible disclosure, yet operate under the guise of it.

User avatar
collige
Posts: 6316
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 4:50 am
Location: Maryland
Contact:

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by collige » Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:25 am

wormcode wrote:ED was a source of cancer anyway...

Fallout 3 was great, but yes it could have been so much better. New Vegas removed some stuff I really liked about Fallout 3, like I noticed karma is useless now, ammo has weight. That would be cool if it were an option. It might be an option though, maybe I chose a different mode. I didn't play through the whole game because of early bugs, but I plan to.
I still haven't played through all the F3 expansions, only Operation Anchorage.
Operation Anchorage is easily the worst one (even though some of it is really cool). Definitely play through Broken Steel, if not all of them, because Broken Steel increases the level cap and lets you keep playing past the original ending of the game.
Statement of Intent VIP / Sahaquiel v4 single out now on UK Trends.
Soundcloud
Soundcloud | Bandcamp | Mixcloud | Twitter

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by wub » Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:30 am

collige wrote:
wormcode wrote:ED was a source of cancer anyway...

Fallout 3 was great, but yes it could have been so much better. New Vegas removed some stuff I really liked about Fallout 3, like I noticed karma is useless now, ammo has weight. That would be cool if it were an option. It might be an option though, maybe I chose a different mode. I didn't play through the whole game because of early bugs, but I plan to.
I still haven't played through all the F3 expansions, only Operation Anchorage.
Operation Anchorage is easily the worst one (even though some of it is really cool). Definitely play through Broken Steel, if not all of them, because Broken Steel increases the level cap and lets you keep playing past the original ending of the game.

Operation Anchorage has it's place IMO. Because of the linear structure of the missions, and the ammo/armour boosts throughout, you can play through it with a starter character. So escape the vault, get to Megaton, then immediately trek across and do Operation Anchorage.

If you play through it all the way and find all the briefcases, you'll bump about 5/6 levels, have access to all the quality stuff in the base at the end and most importantly you'll automatically receive power armour training from the start. Couple that with one of the items in the base being the winterised power armour (i.e. doesn't degrade) and it means you can batter your way through the earlier parts of the game.

Point Lookout was my favourite of the four - big fuck off map, loads of quality weapons and a proper storyline.

User avatar
yoowan
Posts: 768
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:35 pm

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by yoowan » Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:47 am

^
funny that, point lookout was when I thought 'fuck this' and I haven't been on the game since

I dont know what it was about oblivion that I preferred so much more- maybe I just prefer rpg's with a magic based lore/set in the middle ages
you're not wrong, you're just an asshole

User avatar
nowaysj
Posts: 23281
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:11 am
Location: Mountain Fortress

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by nowaysj » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:13 am

knell wrote:
tacospheros wrote:to be honest , the whole thing reeks of cia/disinfo/cointelpro type shit
that was my gut reaction too... would have to be a sponsorship tho, they reference jokes that i havent heard since '05. plus they do stupid shit like release passwords/emails, they're pretty reckless.

also they recently shut down the cia's website, too -q-
Hall of mirrors here. What would a legitimate group look like/do? How could you possibly discern the difference? Even if they are legit, they will be the tool because it will lead to full on net policing.
Join Me
DiegoSapiens wrote:oh fucking hell now i see how on point was nowaysj
Soundcloud

User avatar
antipode
Posts: 4922
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 5:26 am

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by antipode » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:23 am

What a joke. /b/ was never good, but it really went downhill around brbchurch. The news coverage was a plebeian magnet. Calling anonymous a hacker group is like calling Skrillex dubstep. har har har.

Don't know much about lulzsec, but they don't sound much different from the retards that post on 4chan these days.

apart from /x/. love you guys.
jrkhnds wrote:
and I've never really rated dubstep..
- dubstepforum, 2014.

User avatar
Capture pt
Posts: 1294
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 12:19 am
Location: Southampton

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by Capture pt » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:30 am

funny thing is, neither of these "hacker" groups are anywhere near serious, or anywhere near the "big boys" of the "internet underground".

Shum
Posts: 9851
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 9:14 am

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by Shum » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:31 am

Capture pt wrote:funny thing is, neither of these "hacker" groups are anywhere near serious, or anywhere near the "big boys" of the "internet underground".
Image

User avatar
Capture pt
Posts: 1294
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 12:19 am
Location: Southampton

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by Capture pt » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:34 am

nowaysj wrote:
knell wrote:
tacospheros wrote:to be honest , the whole thing reeks of cia/disinfo/cointelpro type shit
that was my gut reaction too... would have to be a sponsorship tho, they reference jokes that i havent heard since '05. plus they do stupid shit like release passwords/emails, they're pretty reckless.

also they recently shut down the cia's website, too -q-
Hall of mirrors here. What would a legitimate group look like/do? How could you possibly discern the difference? Even if they are legit, they will be the tool because it will lead to full on net policing.

a legitimate/proper hacker group wouldn't ever get caught, ever. they sneak in without detection and most definatly don't make press releases.

kingldub
Posts: 2609
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:44 am

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by kingldub » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:45 am

wolf89 wrote:this all seems kind of silly
This.

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by wub » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:51 am

Shum wrote:
Capture pt wrote:funny thing is, neither of these "hacker" groups are anywhere near serious, or anywhere near the "big boys" of the "internet underground".
Image

"Check it out you guys! It's gotta built in 28.8Kbps modem!"

User avatar
Basstronomer
Posts: 1113
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:26 am

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by Basstronomer » Fri Jun 17, 2011 10:06 am

^ Classic :D

User avatar
tacospheros
Posts: 2273
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 10:55 pm
Location: sing sing, NY

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by tacospheros » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:23 pm

Capture pt wrote:
nowaysj wrote:
knell wrote:
tacospheros wrote:to be honest , the whole thing reeks of cia/disinfo/cointelpro type shit
that was my gut reaction too... would have to be a sponsorship tho, they reference jokes that i havent heard since '05. plus they do stupid shit like release passwords/emails, they're pretty reckless.

also they recently shut down the cia's website, too -q-
Hall of mirrors here. What would a legitimate group look like/do? How could you possibly discern the difference? Even if they are legit, they will be the tool because it will lead to full on net policing.

a legitimate/proper hacker group wouldn't ever get caught, ever. they sneak in without detection and most definatly don't make press releases.
THAT'S UNIVERSALLY STUPID !! sorry, Hackers is one of my favorite movies to quote
wub wub wub wub wubwubwubwubwubwubwubwubwubwubwub

http://lucidbackflips.wordpress.com/
@tacosphere tweet tweet, muthafucka

User avatar
DRTY
Posts: 7900
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:08 pm
Location: Bournemouth

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by DRTY » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:28 pm

collige wrote:
wormcode wrote:ED was a source of cancer anyway...

Fallout 3 was great, but yes it could have been so much better. New Vegas removed some stuff I really liked about Fallout 3, like I noticed karma is useless now, ammo has weight. That would be cool if it were an option. It might be an option though, maybe I chose a different mode. I didn't play through the whole game because of early bugs, but I plan to.
I still haven't played through all the F3 expansions, only Operation Anchorage.
Operation Anchorage is easily the worst one (even though some of it is really cool). Definitely play through Broken Steel, if not all of them, because Broken Steel increases the level cap and lets you keep playing past the original ending of the game.
Don't waste your money on New Vegas... it's buggy to the point of being literally unplayable. Mine got to a point where I was on three Quests which had to be done to progress anywhere, all of which had bugs in which made it impossible to complete them. So pissed off.

User avatar
kingGhost
Posts: 2123
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 11:30 pm
Location: charlotte, nc
Contact:

Re: Lulzsec vs 4chan (anon)

Post by kingGhost » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:33 pm

buncha fuckin nerds. take your (supposed) talent and do something productive with it.
Electric_Head wrote:It is in fact my semen.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests