A Nice Documentary on Noise

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
VirtualMark
Posts: 1821
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:15 am
Location: UK

Re: A Nice Documentary on Noise

Post by VirtualMark » Sat Nov 12, 2011 10:21 pm

I can see its there, and i still think its bullshit. It really annoys me. People who make this stuff should be put in a blender and made into sausages and fed to starving children in Africa. Then at least they've served a purpose.

It takes absolutely no skill to make, and generally only pretentious assholes like/respect it. It reminds me of Tracey Emin's wonderful work of "art", which was actually displayed in the Tate gallery:

Image


Its stupid, it stinks, its utterly pointless and takes absolutely no skill to reproduce a similar sound. What next, a movie made up of static? We could just record an untuned tv for a few hours. Great. Who needs a story or characters, define 'movie' anyhow. Just because you don't recognize it blah blah..

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: A Nice Documentary on Noise

Post by wub » Sat Nov 12, 2011 10:30 pm

VirtualMark wrote:I can see its there, and i still think its bullshit.

You not liking something doesn't make it bullshit.

User avatar
mks
Posts: 4155
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 3:35 am
Location: Planet Earth

Re: A Nice Documentary on Noise

Post by mks » Sun Nov 13, 2011 12:45 am

:lol:

I can't wait to see it now!! This has stirred up so much ire it must be good sort of like when Stravinsky premiered the Rite of Spring in Paris and it caused it riot.

As someone who is into Musique Concrete, Plunderphonics, Noise, Field Recordings, Experimental, Ambient, Dadaism and Surrealism etc., I will probably enjoy this.

User avatar
hudson
Posts: 1307
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 10:09 pm

Re: A Nice Documentary on Noise

Post by hudson » Sun Nov 13, 2011 1:18 am

VirtualMark wrote:I can see its there, and i still think its bullshit. It really annoys me. People who make this stuff should be put in a blender and made into sausages and fed to starving children in Africa. Then at least they've served a purpose.

It takes absolutely no skill to make, and generally only pretentious assholes like/respect it. It reminds me of Tracey Emin's wonderful work of "art", which was actually displayed in the Tate gallery:

Its stupid, it stinks, its utterly pointless and takes absolutely no skill to reproduce a similar sound. What next, a movie made up of static? We could just record an untuned tv for a few hours. Great. Who needs a story or characters, define 'movie' anyhow. Just because you don't recognize it blah blah..
This is you:
Image

And right now you sound like all those people who say it takes no talent to make electronic music.

User avatar
mks
Posts: 4155
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 3:35 am
Location: Planet Earth

Re: A Nice Documentary on Noise

Post by mks » Sun Nov 13, 2011 1:44 am

That shit was pretty punk. If it pissed you off then the objective was achieved.

ChadDub
Posts: 2234
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 11:45 pm
Location: Whooping Crane

Re: A Nice Documentary on Noise

Post by ChadDub » Sun Nov 13, 2011 2:31 am

hudson wrote:
VirtualMark wrote:I can see its there, and i still think its bullshit. It really annoys me. People who make this stuff should be put in a blender and made into sausages and fed to starving children in Africa. Then at least they've served a purpose.

It takes absolutely no skill to make, and generally only pretentious assholes like/respect it. It reminds me of Tracey Emin's wonderful work of "art", which was actually displayed in the Tate gallery:

Its stupid, it stinks, its utterly pointless and takes absolutely no skill to reproduce a similar sound. What next, a movie made up of static? We could just record an untuned tv for a few hours. Great. Who needs a story or characters, define 'movie' anyhow. Just because you don't recognize it blah blah..
This is you:
Image

And right now you sound like all those people who say it takes no talent to make electronic music.
Soundcloud

VirtualMark
Posts: 1821
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:15 am
Location: UK

Re: A Nice Documentary on Noise

Post by VirtualMark » Sun Nov 13, 2011 2:49 am

i think chad has pretty much nailed the noise sound! it took him all of 5 minutes to learn everything that noise artists know, he must be a musical genius!

or perhaps theres another explanation... maybe all of the noise artists are fucking morons?

anyhow, who is on board for my movie 'static'. an epic 3 hours of tv static. i also have a sequel planned - the drying of the paint. ***spoilers*** 4 hours of paint drying, but heres the twist - the sweet sound of a fan blowing at it***

bunch of dicks, seriously sort it out. its just a bunch of dudes twiddling knobs, we've all heard the sound when we're trying to program a synth for hours. trying to fit those sounds into a musical piece is where the skill comes in.

and to whoever called me a boxhead or whatever(i don't really get it) - i don't care and fuck off. electronic MUSIC takes skill, electronic NOISE doesn't. but good luck with this genre, i'm sure the clubs will be packed out with people who just can't wait to hear the latest 'noise' dj play. he could just put a pin in one of the leads and generate a 2 hour 'set' of mains hum, that would be great!

ChadDub
Posts: 2234
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 11:45 pm
Location: Whooping Crane

Re: A Nice Documentary on Noise

Post by ChadDub » Sun Nov 13, 2011 3:46 am

VirtualMark wrote:i think chad has pretty much nailed the noise sound! it took him all of 5 minutes to learn everything that noise artists know, he must be a musical genius!

or perhaps theres another explanation... maybe all of the noise artists are fucking morons?
No, I'm just a beast.

acrap
Posts: 254
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 11:03 pm

Re: A Nice Documentary on Noise

Post by acrap » Sun Nov 13, 2011 4:09 am

LMAO!!!

User avatar
big_lurch
Posts: 130
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 2:12 am

Re: A Nice Documentary on Noise

Post by big_lurch » Sun Nov 13, 2011 6:09 am

as someone else noted, there's truly something to be said about PLAYING this type of music- low lights, loud amps, heavy vibes....producing otherworldly, hallucinatory sounds from cheap and broken consumer electronics that blot out the boundaries of what traditionally defines music. i'd imagine the purists of the day hated on something like free jazz for similar reasons. some people prefer ultra crisp and polished production, careful attention to proper arrangement and staying within traditional forms , others prefer to make loud ugly threatening noises that cause people to get all bent out of shape :)

at the end of the day it's all sound. have you ever sat and listened to the sounds of the world around you? it's all beautiful fucking noise and drones :W:

JBE
Posts: 901
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 6:09 pm

Re: A Nice Documentary on Noise

Post by JBE » Sun Nov 13, 2011 7:05 am

VirtualMark wrote:
It takes absolutely no skill to make, and generally only pretentious assholes like/respect it. It reminds me of Tracey Emin's wonderful work of "art", which was actually displayed in the Tate gallery:

Image
That looks kinda like my room. I should take a picture of it and get PAID!!!!

cloak and dagger
Posts: 1146
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 12:09 pm
Location: Sittin' on the curb debatin' how to get it percolatin'
Contact:

Re: A Nice Documentary on Noise

Post by cloak and dagger » Sun Nov 13, 2011 9:15 am

wow...just WOW @ people trying to claim art isn't art

VirtualMark
Posts: 1821
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:15 am
Location: UK

Re: A Nice Documentary on Noise

Post by VirtualMark » Sun Nov 13, 2011 10:07 am

cloak and dagger wrote:wow...just WOW @ people trying to claim art isn't art
this might well interest you. it was pretty much designed for art connoisseurs such as yourself:

Image


From the Wikipedia entry:

A tin was sold for €124,000 at Sotheby's on May 23 2007[1]; in October 2008 tin 083 was offered for sale at Sotheby's with an estimate of £50-70,000. It sold for £97,250[2]. The cans were originally to be valued according to their equivalent weight in gold — $37 each in 1961 — with the price fluctuating according to the market[3].

One of Manzoni's collaborators, Agostino Bonalumi, claimed that the tins are full not of faeces but plaster[4]; in contrast Manzoni's girlfriend Nanda Vigo, who helped him produce the cans, claimed the contents really were faeces[citation needed]. Vigo's assertion is disputed by Manzoni's brother and sister[citation needed], but some cans have leaked and confirmed they are indeed faeces[citation needed] — though whether human or animal has not been verified. An art dealer from the Gallery Blu in Milan claims to have detected a fecal odour emanating from a can[5].



Yes, thats right. It illustrates how far art fanatics will go, somebody paid £97,250 for another persons shit. I personally think these types of people are idiots, although i would be more than happy to part them with their life savings for a can of my own shit.

As far as this noise crap goes. I can see a use for it if making a sci fi movie, it would be good for maybe an alien world or a surreal landscape. But calling it a genre of music? Really? At one point in the video, the guy has some white noise blaring out, he then touches an input on his tongue several times to make a mains hum, then he puts mics and speakers together to create feedback and finishes off his masterpiece by yelling down the mic. Silly old twat.

All of this is inharmonic and really doesn't require any skill.

The funniest thing about this video is seeing all of that hardware they own, and none of them have a clue how to work it! :lol:

JBE
Posts: 901
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 6:09 pm

Re: A Nice Documentary on Noise

Post by JBE » Sun Nov 13, 2011 11:18 am

Image

cloak and dagger
Posts: 1146
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 12:09 pm
Location: Sittin' on the curb debatin' how to get it percolatin'
Contact:

Re: A Nice Documentary on Noise

Post by cloak and dagger » Sun Nov 13, 2011 12:02 pm

VirtualMark wrote:
All of this doesn't require any skill.

1. Prove it. In general, people without skill aren't featured in documentaries.

2. Who cares? Since when does "requiring skill" have anything to do with the quality of something?
Last edited by cloak and dagger on Sun Nov 13, 2011 12:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

cloak and dagger
Posts: 1146
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 12:09 pm
Location: Sittin' on the curb debatin' how to get it percolatin'
Contact:

Re: A Nice Documentary on Noise

Post by cloak and dagger » Sun Nov 13, 2011 12:04 pm

.

VirtualMark
Posts: 1821
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:15 am
Location: UK

Re: A Nice Documentary on Noise

Post by VirtualMark » Sun Nov 13, 2011 1:38 pm

cloak and dagger wrote:
1. Prove it. In general, people without skill aren't featured in documentaries.

2. Who cares? Since when does "requiring skill" have anything to do with the quality of something?
I can't work out if you're being serious or not, i don't even really want to respond. If you are being serious then thats one of the dumbest statement i've ever read. If not, then good trolling. :4:

samurai
Posts: 486
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 1:26 pm

Re: A Nice Documentary on Noise

Post by samurai » Sun Nov 13, 2011 2:23 pm

ok it's kind of ridiculous to try and have any sort of serious conversation about this on a public forum such as this. reason being is that people are coming from vastly different backgrounds and are all trying to argue under the one roof. it's not going to work. the views of some people here are just so far removed from one another that any sort of logical discussion is impossible.
electronic MUSIC takes skill, electronic NOISE doesn't. but good luck with this genre, i'm sure the clubs will be packed out with people who just can't wait to hear the latest 'noise' dj play.
with quotes like this being thrown around I think it's fairly obvious that any sort of discussion on the matter is kind of impossible. this is not any sort of diss towards virtualmark or anything. it just seems from that quote that the apparent goal of every sort of musician is to pack clubs. of course most of us would agree that sort of thinking is obviously not true.

recently at college we were having a class discussion about the artistic use of sampling. the difference between using an entire loop versus chopping it up, digging for rare sounds, etc. etc. a couple of people in the class were unable to take part in the discussion simply because they believed point blank that sampling was wrong. cheap and lazy is how they described it. now that's fine if they want to believe that then that's their prerogative, unfortunately it made any sort of rational discussion concerning various sampling techniques and styles impossible. so they were simply left out of the discussion.

it is very difficult to have a discussion with somebody whose views are so disparate from your own. especially when both parties are so reluctant to move from their viewpoint.

I will try to draw a simple analogy. one that I believe is sufficient for a dubstep production forum.
-imagine if somebody downloaded a load of loop packs. they then assembled these into a full song. each element of the song was simply lifted from one of the loop packs (EVVY_DUB-STEP_VOL.3). all the drums, synths, vocal samples, bassline. all just loops from the sample pack.
-now if another person produced a very similar (or the exact same song if you want to be particular about the details) by programming the drums. programming the synth and bass patches, and also coming up with the melodies. went and grabbed some odd vocal samples, from field recordings or from some old VHS tapes.

now imagine if both finished songs are very (or exactly) similar. the finished product of both sound sonically similar, yet they are both different. different processes were involved in producing each tune. sometimes the process of creation is just as important as the end result. the above quote from virtualmark says that "electronic music takes skill, electronic NOISE doesn't".

some people value the process, as well as the finished article. some people believe that the concept is very important. others believe that the only thing that matters is the finished article. and it doesn't matter how the piece was created. some people look at abstract expressionist pieces and say "my child could do that", anybody who says that has completely missed the point of it.

lastly I always think it is very arrogant of anybody to proclaim that what they don't view as art simply isn't art. this sort of thinking is ridiculous, but I understand that extremist viewpoints are necessary so therefore I wouldn't want them to totally disappear. for a person to say "everything which I define as art is art. everything else is not art. end of story." is extremely arrogant. when you dismiss any artform as not real art, that is essentially what you are doing.

remember nothing exists in a vacuum. you cannot simply look at something without examining what it exists in relation to. noise exists all around us. it naturally occurs. a part of noise music is framing what naturally occurs around us (in much the same way humans frame our surroundings when we use a camera, it is the same principle). by doing so we recontextualize the piece. doing so (framing and recontextualizing a piece) is one of the basic values of what defines art.

cloak and dagger
Posts: 1146
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 12:09 pm
Location: Sittin' on the curb debatin' how to get it percolatin'
Contact:

Re: A Nice Documentary on Noise

Post by cloak and dagger » Sun Nov 13, 2011 2:41 pm

VirtualMark wrote:
cloak and dagger wrote:
1. Prove it. In general, people without skill aren't featured in documentaries.

2. Who cares? Since when does "requiring skill" have anything to do with the quality of something?
I can't work out if you're being serious or not, i don't even really want to respond. If you are being serious then thats one of the dumbest statement i've ever read. If not, then good trolling. :4:

I guess I'm just having trouble figuring out why an intellectual such as yourself struggles to understand art

cloak and dagger
Posts: 1146
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 12:09 pm
Location: Sittin' on the curb debatin' how to get it percolatin'
Contact:

Re: A Nice Documentary on Noise

Post by cloak and dagger » Sun Nov 13, 2011 2:46 pm

samurai wrote:ok it's kind of ridiculous to try and have any sort of serious conversation about this on a public forum such as this. reason being is that people are coming from vastly different backgrounds and are all trying to argue under the one roof. it's not going to work. the views of some people here are just so far removed from one another that any sort of logical discussion is impossible.
electronic MUSIC takes skill, electronic NOISE doesn't. but good luck with this genre, i'm sure the clubs will be packed out with people who just can't wait to hear the latest 'noise' dj play.
with quotes like this being thrown around I think it's fairly obvious that any sort of discussion on the matter is kind of impossible. this is not any sort of diss towards virtualmark or anything. it just seems from that quote that the apparent goal of every sort of musician is to pack clubs. of course most of us would agree that sort of thinking is obviously not true.

recently at college we were having a class discussion about the artistic use of sampling. the difference between using an entire loop versus chopping it up, digging for rare sounds, etc. etc. a couple of people in the class were unable to take part in the discussion simply because they believed point blank that sampling was wrong. cheap and lazy is how they described it. now that's fine if they want to believe that then that's their prerogative, unfortunately it made any sort of rational discussion concerning various sampling techniques and styles impossible. so they were simply left out of the discussion.

it is very difficult to have a discussion with somebody whose views are so disparate from your own. especially when both parties are so reluctant to move from their viewpoint.

I will try to draw a simple analogy. one that I believe is sufficient for a dubstep production forum.
-imagine if somebody downloaded a load of loop packs. they then assembled these into a full song. each element of the song was simply lifted from one of the loop packs (EVVY_DUB-STEP_VOL.3). all the drums, synths, vocal samples, bassline. all just loops from the sample pack.
-now if another person produced a very similar (or the exact same song if you want to be particular about the details) by programming the drums. programming the synth and bass patches, and also coming up with the melodies. went and grabbed some odd vocal samples, from field recordings or from some old VHS tapes.

now imagine if both finished songs are very (or exactly) similar. the finished product of both sound sonically similar, yet they are both different. different processes were involved in producing each tune. sometimes the process of creation is just as important as the end result. the above quote from virtualmark says that "electronic music takes skill, electronic NOISE doesn't".

some people value the process, as well as the finished article. some people believe that the concept is very important. others believe that the only thing that matters is the finished article. and it doesn't matter how the piece was created. some people look at abstract expressionist pieces and say "my child could do that", anybody who says that has completely missed the point of it.

lastly I always think it is very arrogant of anybody to proclaim that what they don't view as art simply isn't art. this sort of thinking is ridiculous, but I understand that extremist viewpoints are necessary so therefore I wouldn't want them to totally disappear. for a person to say "everything which I define as art is art. everything else is not art. end of story." is extremely arrogant. when you dismiss any artform as not real art, that is essentially what you are doing.

remember nothing exists in a vacuum. you cannot simply look at something without examining what it exists in relation to. noise exists all around us. it naturally occurs. a part of noise music is framing what naturally occurs around us (in much the same way humans frame our surroundings when we use a camera, it is the same principle). by doing so we recontextualize the piece. doing so (framing and recontextualizing a piece) is one of the basic values of what defines art.

I would respond to this, but an emoticon is worth a thousand words: :U:

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests