FFS....pk- wrote:he's going to burst out of a coffin at the next wrestlemania and challenge owen hart to a title match
True,but only if you're a man/father.unklefesta wrote:yeah...
it takes a special breed of psycho to kill your own kid
hmmm. interesting point.Echo Wanderer wrote:True,but only if you're a man/father.unklefesta wrote:yeah...
it takes a special breed of psycho to kill your own kid
If a woman drives her 3 kids into a lake and leaves then to drown,hangs her 4 little girls and herself,beats her child sensless/to death,leaves them in a dumpster to die,shoots them in the belly with a shotgun,stones them to death,feeds them 3,400 milligrams of salt as a punishment knowing full well it would kill an adult,and other things of the like,then she is just "stressed" or has "post-pardem depression".All these things have happened within the last 8 years.And all of these so called "normal mothers" garnered public sympathy rather than the disgust men get in the exact same situatiion.In fact,I think these mothers are even more extreme about how they go about it.Men who flip out like this do it all cut and dry.These women actually come up with some really creative ways to kill thier children!!!And in the event the father doesn't kill himself,he goes directly to prison or the chair.A woman goes to a "treatment center".
Personally,I consider them just as psychotic.Too bad the rest of this post-feminist,male emasculating,politically correct country we live in can't see it too.I'm sure if Ann Coulter had kids and killed them,no one would EVER blame the fact that she is a complete tnuc.They'd say,"Awww...she must have been having a bad day...".
[To the mothers and women on this forum:Don't take me wrong.I am not trying to come off all Tom Cruise-like or anything,as I believe that PPD is something very serious.I just also believe that a woman who kills her own child should be viewed as a horribly as they would a man,not as someone with day-to-day problems that just kind of "piled up".]
I'm in Souf Cali,US.dj slums wrote: hmmm. interesting point.
not sure where youre from, but recently in the uk, about 3 or 4 women were released from prison after serving a few years in inside for supposedly killing their children. all these women had lost more than one child. they were sent down purely on the advice of some doctor who said that because they all had more than one child that had died, it couldnt be cot death, it must be murder. and now they say he is wrong. unfortunatley, one of the mothers is now dead, having never really gotten over the death of her children and then being blamed for their deaths and being sent to prison for it. the other women are trying to rebuild whats left of their lives, but i think at least 2 are now seperated from their husbands and dont really see their remaing children.
fucked up.
ROID RAGEMarsyas wrote:roids
fucked up.Echo Wanderer wrote:I'm in Souf Cali,US.dj slums wrote: hmmm. interesting point.
not sure where youre from, but recently in the uk, about 3 or 4 women were released from prison after serving a few years in inside for supposedly killing their children. all these women had lost more than one child. they were sent down purely on the advice of some doctor who said that because they all had more than one child that had died, it couldnt be cot death, it must be murder. and now they say he is wrong. unfortunatley, one of the mothers is now dead, having never really gotten over the death of her children and then being blamed for their deaths and being sent to prison for it. the other women are trying to rebuild whats left of their lives, but i think at least 2 are now seperated from their husbands and dont really see their remaing children.
fucked up.
That's a sad story to hear.It's happened here as well.But the mothers that did these terrible murders here in the US were not only found guilty and sent to the aforementioned "treatment centres",or died of guilt and by thier own hand,but are treated as victims.In the US,good fathers have no rights after divorce in most states(none in California or Texas for sure).The general idea is that all mothers are the caring ones,the fathers being the assholes,even if the woman was unfaithful,abusive(a growing problem with many women power struggling with thier husbands/lovers/boyfriends),or bad parenting.
In the post-feminist US,men are still seen as dogs and pigs.While I agree most of us probably are,those men give the minority of us a bad name.For example:I have never cheated.I just don't believe in it.It's not any sort of moral decision really.I just respect honesty.I think it's a waste of time if I am not interested in my girlfriend anymore or I had met someone that i connect with on a deeper level.I think it's much easier to break it off before anything happens,than to break someone else's heart.I have been cheated on however,and I would NEVER put that kind of pain on anyone.The worst part(and I have a few jilted friends who agree),is that when a woman cheats,she either brandishes pseudo-feminist vitriol as an excuse,or says it was simply "an accident".But of course,if a man does it,he is painted a liar,cheater,and thief who should be drawn and quartered.I think it's just as fucked up with either gender.But I digress...
Many men here have learned after ages of machoism to become better humans,husbands/boyfriends,and fathers.But a lot of good,stable,loving fathers are still screwed because of a politically correct society that is rooted deeply in feminist hipocracy,recently revived pre-Sufferage ideals(due in to part the increasing awareness over the last 10 years of the inhumane treatment of women in primarily Muslim areas of the Middle East and the female circumcision "rites" of certain tribes in Africa),as well as apathy brought on by an over 50% divorce rate in this country.
Speaking of Tejas,you might find this a bit interesting:
http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=782
Oh,and the woman who hung her four daughters,then herself?I guess she was a "victim" too.
http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=781
It kind of makes me think about Paris H. a bit.She served only half of her time because of celebrity.The truth is,she would have only served an extra week if she was just a "regular girl".I have never met a woman who has spent any time in prison(not county,that's a cakewalk)except one for meth.Her sentence?5-10 years on four counts of possession,at least one count of distribution,and being under the influence of the drug.Her stay?14 months.Any man would have to serve at least the minimum.She had more than 3 strikes,yet she walks.A man does that,he gets life.
You know that's right.And you know she's still a bit steamed about Paula Jones,Gennifer Flowers(what a pornstar name...),and Monica Lewinski.Personally,I think she let it happen.I think she's had her eye on the prize that whole presidency.She's always been more of a man than Bill as it is.Aye...she's got two sets:Her own and Bill's in her dresser.sizzla wrote:it looks like Hillary Clinton might pull it off in the next elections. if that' so you know it's gone be alot worse for men as she's being supported by alotta women's groups. c'mon Obama baby, raise that loot.
randomhed wrote:The plot thickens. Apparently an article on wiki relating to the wrestler was changed stating chris had missed something because of the death of his wife. This happened 14 hours before the bodies were discovered.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/w ... 007867.ece
I reckon OJ simpson had something to do with it.
This has gotta be about the most blatantly sexist thing I've read on this board in a long ass time.Echo Wanderer wrote: I don't think the US is ready for a woman president.It sounds good in theory,but women are too emotional and a lot of times crack under pressure.They take to thier own agendas(ie:Hillary)more than look into the needs of the many.But where a black president might have to struggle with deep rooted,personal,race issues(mainly with whites,but on some levels,hispanics as well),a female president would most likely take a more direct,immediate approach,viewing men as the lesser race,thus giving women "superiority rights".Race issues only go back so far,man hating goes back to the dawn of time.
Men are pigs,but we don't deserve to die.
I am actually not surprised you chimed in with a "face value" interpretation on this.AND YOU OBVIOUSLY MISSED THE BLATANT SARCASM.Almost every political OPINION I have ever expressed on this board you have called me out as something somewhat ignorant,uninformed,right,racist,and now sexist.First off,and with all due respect sir,I am entitled to an opinion.An opinion that I base on personal experience and broad observation.Normally,I just let it go.This is the first time I am actually responding back,because(and I will not say this as factual),you seem at times to contradict just to contradict.I do not know you,nor do I claim to,and I mostly agree with the myriad political opinions you express on this forum.But you do not know me enough to call me racist,sexist,classist,or anything of that ilk.I am a lot more informed than you think.RickyRicardo wrote:This has gotta be about the most blatantly sexist thing I've read on this board in a long ass time.Echo Wanderer wrote: I don't think the US is ready for a woman president.It sounds good in theory,but women are too emotional and a lot of times crack under pressure.They take to thier own agendas(ie:Hillary)more than look into the needs of the many.But where a black president might have to struggle with deep rooted,personal,race issues(mainly with whites,but on some levels,hispanics as well),a female president would most likely take a more direct,immediate approach,viewing men as the lesser race,thus giving women "superiority rights".Race issues only go back so far,man hating goes back to the dawn of time.
Men are pigs,but we don't deserve to die.
I'm no Hillary fan myself, but to suggest that she'd be a bad president b/c "women are too emotional and a lot of times crack under pressure" is a fucking ridiculous assertion and ignores the scores of previous female presidents, PM's, queens, and empresses who have directly countered this notion throughout history.
" at the bottom of my post?I have not read one single response,nor recieved a single pm from any of the women on this forum regarding this,but you pulled an attack on this immediately.It's almost like the abortion issue,you know,where most of the people and lawmakers against it are men,yet they cannot physically have children due to thier gender and all,but are so outspoken about it nonetheless.sounds like you youve had an interesting and colourful upbringing chap. reading your last posts very interesting, which confuses me even more when reading your previous post.Echo Wanderer wrote:I am actually not surprised you chimed in with a "face value" interpretation on this.AND YOU OBVIOUSLY MISSED THE BLATANT SARCASM.Almost every political OPINION I have ever expressed on this board you have called me out as something somewhat ignorant,uninformed,right,racist,and now sexist.First off,and with all due respect sir,I am entitled to an opinion.An opinion that I base on personal experience and broad observation.Normally,I just let it go.This is the first time I am actually responding back,because(and I will not say this as factual),you seem at times to contradict just to contradict.I do not know you,nor do I claim to,and I mostly agree with the myriad political opinions you express on this forum.But you do not know me enough to call me racist,sexist,classist,or anything of that ilk.I am a lot more informed than you think.RickyRicardo wrote:This has gotta be about the most blatantly sexist thing I've read on this board in a long ass time.Echo Wanderer wrote: I don't think the US is ready for a woman president.It sounds good in theory,but women are too emotional and a lot of times crack under pressure.They take to thier own agendas(ie:Hillary)more than look into the needs of the many.But where a black president might have to struggle with deep rooted,personal,race issues(mainly with whites,but on some levels,hispanics as well),a female president would most likely take a more direct,immediate approach,viewing men as the lesser race,thus giving women "superiority rights".Race issues only go back so far,man hating goes back to the dawn of time.
Men are pigs,but we don't deserve to die.
I'm no Hillary fan myself, but to suggest that she'd be a bad president b/c "women are too emotional and a lot of times crack under pressure" is a fucking ridiculous assertion and ignores the scores of previous female presidents, PM's, queens, and empresses who have directly countered this notion throughout history.
So before you call me out as something that I disagree with,let me give you a little background about myself:
I am the only boy raised by a single mother who worked her ass off working three jobs to provide for three children.My mother,a strong woman who fought against Vietnam in the '60s,carried me around(not my sisters,mind you) during NOW and ERA marches in the '70s,raised me to love all peoples,regardless of race,religion/spirtuality,gender,sexual orientation,political leaning,or economical status.I respect my mother for providing me with an education that most children will never have the opportunity to recieve,even via "higher education".Oh...and she is white.
Additionally,I am of mixed race.I have seen the full spectrum of racism.I have been jumped by every race out there,because I am not "black enough" or "white enough",or not not of a certain race.Many think I am hispanic,yet I have none in my racial background,which has especially caused me problems in SoCal,where blacks and hispanics don't really get along(I was once jumped by a girl I was dating's familia because apparently when I told her I had no latin in me she felt somewhat "betrayed".It's kind of a no-no in traditional Mexican families here to date outside la raza).
I was also adopted.My father's family originates from Sonora,Mexico,while my mother's side is primarily blue-blood English.Myself?Black,Irish,Sioux.Historically,I should have a lot to be pissed off about considering all my peoples were enslaved(again SARCASM).In fact,my mother made it a point to push the issue that I learn about all of these cultures and races because it's who I am.To explore my cultural background,not just "pick a side" as so many mixed kids do.
(Should add here that I don't need to hear the whole "eveyone is mixed/no one is truly racially pure" speech,because I already know this.)
Now,on the sexism thing.Most of my friends are women.My profession is dominated by women.In fact,I prefer to date women who are independent,strong,cerebral thinkers.I believe with great conviction in most feminist ideals and have,in fact,been active in many of the feminist causes(even been arrested for it!).I see women in positions of power on a daily basis.I don't think I have had a male boss in years.And I have given unrelenting respect to evey single female I have ever met.I'm sorry,but that's how I was raised and how I believe it should be.I have had PLENTY of time to observe how women interact with men and each other.As I said,I had to live in it for most of my life,including my family(in which even my extended one is mostly women and still adding),female roommates,girlfriends,best friends,long-term clients,co-workers,and buisness partners.And yes,as it is common in American society,most women are taught not to suppress emotion.Yes,I do agree with you about the female presidents,queens,and other high ranking officials who look at matters and handle them unbiased.But they are from different cultures,countries,and eras.And yes,there are women in this country now that I feel would be more qualified than Hillary as president.Even,dare I say...Condi.
But I have also said that I don't think America is ready for a black president either.Does that make me a rascist?I think not,but you have the right to your opinion on that as well.Sizzla's post could be taken as sexist too,but I don't see you jumping down his throat and calling him out as such.Did you even note the "
I will say this.I have nothing but respect for you and every member of this forum and all the opinions expressed here(no matter what the subject).And if you want to flex your moderator muscle and have me banned for standing up for myself in this moment,I wll respect that decision as well,and with no love lost.But please,before you start calling other people out as something that everyone would agree as negative,be sure you know who they are first.You might just find that people aren't always 100% serious.
That said,I still stand by my opinion that Hillary has too many personal agendas.And I agree with Sizzla's opinion that men in this country will have some new social and economic challenges if she makes it.And I am quite sure that the feminist groups(as well as women in general)in this country would be right behind her to make sure she "takes care of business",as at this point,they are her strongest contingent.That is not to say she would be a "bad president",as you assumed I said,but she definitely shows signs of vindication.And understandably so.Bill was kind of a dick to her.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
