Still trying to comprehend....
You asked :
Light-Stories wrote:So I have been talking with this label for a few weeks, sending them tracks and whatnot.
They said that they want to release a few of them on a ep. They want me to get the tracks mastered. They said that if i send them the masters they will send me the contract.
...
what do you guys think?
and were answered:
dididub wrote:
Labels should normally take care of the mastering. Sounds extremely dodgy.
hudson wrote:You're getting ripped off by the label. If they're making you pay for your own mastering then I can't imagine what they could possibly offer you. This doesn't sound like a real label to me.
Project EX wrote:hudson wrote:You're getting ripped off by the label. If they're making you pay for your own mastering then I can't imagine what they could possibly offer you. This doesn't sound like a real label to me.
This!
£10 Bag wrote:Any half decent label will MASTER, PROMOTE, DISTRIBUTE, AND THEN PAY YOU FOR anything you release with them.
Labels invest in artists, not the other way round.
Mad EP wrote:I'm not saying it's never done, but most legit labels don't tend to ask their artists to pay for their own mastering... Personally, I would walk from a label that asked me to pay for my own mastering
Sharmaji wrote:for an actual release, labels pay for mastering. period.
But somehow we still ended up with :
Light-Stories wrote:
Im going to go for it. £45 for a release, to get out there. It could move on to bigger and better things.
Thanks for the advice everyone.
I hope I am wrong - but my gut says you are being taken advantage of... there are always plenty of people willing to "sign" you as long as you front the cash. Same goes with those bogus gigs where you are responsible for selling X amount of tix otherwise YOU pay. Getting a release for the sake of getting a release with a charlatan label isn't nearly as important or game-changing as you might think.
EDIT -- Also - what was in the contract?! Because you might have been double screwed here... legally promising exclusivity of those tracks to the label who didn't pay for them? Usually the contract states how the label will pay for the mastering, artwork & manufacturing costs - plus X amount for the advance... and in return, you promise the tracks to be exclusive to the label for a set amount of time. The label has provided NONE of that... so what terms are being agreed upon in the contract???