ALPACAFILES

debate, appreciation, interviews, reviews (events or releases), videos, radio shows
User avatar
Raggles
Posts: 1838
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:14 pm
Location: Swag

Re: ALPACAFILES

Post by Raggles » Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:25 pm

:W:
Image
ketamine wrote:Just believe, Lyons, you can be whatever you want. Be a unicorn! Or a table!

User avatar
rap_dot_com
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 7:12 am

Re: ALPACAFILES

Post by rap_dot_com » Mon Jul 02, 2012 3:40 pm

Were you only looking for dubstep mixes?

User avatar
SCope13
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 5:57 pm
Location: Nebraska

Re: ALPACAFILES

Post by SCope13 » Mon Jul 02, 2012 4:03 pm

Great idea. Fucking hyped for this. I'm willing to contribute writing articles and the like if you need. Big ups.
ultraspatial wrote:doing any sort of drug other than smoking crack is 5 panel.
incnic wrote:true headz tread a fine line between bitterness and euphoria - much like the best rave tunes

User avatar
the wiggle baron
Posts: 5420
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 6:30 pm
Location: Oxford

Re: ALPACAFILES

Post by the wiggle baron » Mon Jul 02, 2012 4:26 pm

Barefiles was always pretty much exactly what it said. Bare files.

A load of old classic mixes in one place is never going to be a bad thing. Personally though I would say the best way to do it would be to have whoever the people in charge are as the ones who upload all the mixes, a) to keep out clutter, and b) possibly in combination with reuploading the mixes somewhere safe, protect against dead mixes marring the whole thing

Got a fair few old ones, my computers kind of a mess though...
Saturday nights 7-9pm GMT - Wiggle Baron @ SubFM!

Radio archive: http://www.dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=60164.html
Mixes: http://www.dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=63354
Electronic Explorations 035
Deeper Mix
Bad Mood Dub
2hr Classics Selection

User avatar
SCope13
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 5:57 pm
Location: Nebraska

Re: ALPACAFILES

Post by SCope13 » Mon Jul 02, 2012 4:32 pm

Having people in charge only uploading could be a good idea, but I definitely think users should be able to submit whatever mixes they have and then the mods or whatever can decide if they're quality enough to be uploaded.
ultraspatial wrote:doing any sort of drug other than smoking crack is 5 panel.
incnic wrote:true headz tread a fine line between bitterness and euphoria - much like the best rave tunes

User avatar
fractal
Mako
Posts: 12133
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:58 pm
Location: emerald city, cascadia

Re: ALPACAFILES

Post by fractal » Mon Jul 02, 2012 5:26 pm

not only dubstep, there's too much great music out there to keep it one dimensional. keep the suggestions coming, this site is for the people! what kind of filters/tags would you like to be able to sort/search by? should uploads be approved before going live? 320 standard where applicable? (sorry rinse)

where all my alpacas at?
sub.wise:.
slow down
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum

User avatar
Dub_freak
Posts: 2607
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 8:45 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: ALPACAFILES

Post by Dub_freak » Mon Jul 02, 2012 5:29 pm

It shouldn't be limited to just old mixes and shouldn't be limited to just dubstep.
cloaked_up wrote:looks like he is wearing a green neon EDM mini bar fridge lamp shoe

User avatar
the wiggle baron
Posts: 5420
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 6:30 pm
Location: Oxford

Re: ALPACAFILES

Post by the wiggle baron » Mon Jul 02, 2012 5:31 pm

SCope13 wrote:Having people in charge only uploading could be a good idea, but I definitely think users should be able to submit whatever mixes they have and then the mods or whatever can decide if they're quality enough to be uploaded.
yeah pretty much. But was also thinking they could potentially upload them to their own server to stream/download from. Just so as to hopefully make the site a bit futureproof! Dont want no megrrupload fail!
Saturday nights 7-9pm GMT - Wiggle Baron @ SubFM!

Radio archive: http://www.dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=60164.html
Mixes: http://www.dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=63354
Electronic Explorations 035
Deeper Mix
Bad Mood Dub
2hr Classics Selection

User avatar
fractal
Mako
Posts: 12133
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:58 pm
Location: emerald city, cascadia

Re: ALPACAFILES

Post by fractal » Mon Jul 02, 2012 5:32 pm

Dub_freak wrote:It shouldn't be limited to just old mixes and shouldn't be limited to just dubstep.
standard

we just want a place for files that won't be lost. our main mission is to make music from today, yesterday and tomorrow available to all
sub.wise:.
slow down
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum

User avatar
ultraspatial
Posts: 7818
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 4:17 pm
Location: Bromania

Re: ALPACAFILES

Post by ultraspatial » Mon Jul 02, 2012 6:16 pm

fractal wrote:not only dubstep, there's too much great music out there to keep it one dimensional. keep the suggestions coming, this site is for the people! what kind of filters/tags would you like to be able to sort/search by? should uploads be approved before going live? 320 standard where applicable? (sorry rinse)
320 for mixes is a bit much...
As for tags, I think genre and artist name are good enough.

User avatar
fractal
Mako
Posts: 12133
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:58 pm
Location: emerald city, cascadia

Re: ALPACAFILES

Post by fractal » Mon Jul 02, 2012 6:46 pm

320 is a bit much? wow, two years ago people would have complained,,, people still complain about rinse and they're better then they've ever been lol

the assumption was that people who enjoy bass heavy music would want as much low end as possible without getting too crazy size wise

for tags, i think year would be a great addition... maybe even a space for the contributors name?
sub.wise:.
slow down
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum

User avatar
the wiggle baron
Posts: 5420
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 6:30 pm
Location: Oxford

Re: ALPACAFILES

Post by the wiggle baron » Mon Jul 02, 2012 7:12 pm

Just my opinion, and its only a 2 cents really as I havent got anything to do with this, but I dont think it should include recent or non dubstep mixes. Theres a million places (or just...google) you can go to to listen to good mixes by good artists. Would just make this project a small version of what everyone can find anyway. If it was to be a nostalgic barefiles reminisce it should be just all those classic mixes that defined dubstep for years. Ive got a load of mixes from 2006 or so that I remember absoloutely sessioning back then. Where you know exactly what the next tunes going to be and when its going to get dropped. The kind of mixes that make tunes on their own sound wrong when they dont mix into whatever is next on the mix where you first heard it!

Mine thoughts yah!
Saturday nights 7-9pm GMT - Wiggle Baron @ SubFM!

Radio archive: http://www.dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=60164.html
Mixes: http://www.dubstepforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=63354
Electronic Explorations 035
Deeper Mix
Bad Mood Dub
2hr Classics Selection

User avatar
ultraspatial
Posts: 7818
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 4:17 pm
Location: Bromania

Re: ALPACAFILES

Post by ultraspatial » Mon Jul 02, 2012 7:26 pm

fractal wrote:320 is a bit much? wow, two years ago people would have complained,,, people still complain about rinse and they're better then they've ever been
You rarely get mixes in 320 and they'd be way too big (guessing somewhere around 200 mb for a 1 hr mix). Not saying there shouldn't be mixes in 320 uploaded, but I don't think strictly 320 is a good idea. I personally don't have any old mixes that beat the 192 mark.

User avatar
SCope13
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 5:57 pm
Location: Nebraska

Re: ALPACAFILES

Post by SCope13 » Mon Jul 02, 2012 8:10 pm

I agree with Ultraspatial on the bitrates. All 320 all the time is just too much to ask.

And I think allowing mixes that aren't dubstep should be considered. I think having just bass music in general would be great, but I can see the reasoning for just having dubstep stuff too. Idk, whatever it ends up being, I'm sure it'll be great.
ultraspatial wrote:doing any sort of drug other than smoking crack is 5 panel.
incnic wrote:true headz tread a fine line between bitterness and euphoria - much like the best rave tunes

User avatar
Jurrecane
Posts: 666
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:35 pm
Location: Leiden, Netherlands

Re: ALPACAFILES

Post by Jurrecane » Mon Jul 02, 2012 8:19 pm

So is this strictly about the nostalgic aspect or is this just a place to share music?
I have nothing to do with this really as i also have nothing to give to this site, but i would personally like different genres across the whole 'bass music' banner. UKG, Grime, UK Funky whatever! Not just dubstep.
My 2 cents really.

Still big up for doing this, was never there when BareFiles was online but from what i've read it sounds really sick!

User avatar
fractal
Mako
Posts: 12133
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:58 pm
Location: emerald city, cascadia

Re: ALPACAFILES

Post by fractal » Mon Jul 02, 2012 8:26 pm

keep the thoughts coming! wiggle, what year would be the cut off in your proposal?

afaik, nothing is set in stone

the more feedback the better
sub.wise:.
slow down
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum

User avatar
ultraspatial
Posts: 7818
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 4:17 pm
Location: Bromania

Re: ALPACAFILES

Post by ultraspatial » Mon Jul 02, 2012 8:50 pm

Imo recent mixes should be uploaded but not xfm, boilerroom, fact etc stuff that can be found easily.

User avatar
collige
Posts: 6316
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 4:50 am
Location: Maryland
Contact:

Re: ALPACAFILES

Post by collige » Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:42 pm

320 only would be overkill and keep off a lot of older stuff, but sorting by bitrate would be fantastic.
Statement of Intent VIP / Sahaquiel v4 single out now on UK Trends.
Soundcloud
Soundcloud | Bandcamp | Mixcloud | Twitter

Phigure
Posts: 14134
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 5:55 am
Contact:

Re: ALPACAFILES

Post by Phigure » Tue Jul 03, 2012 1:31 am

i think a big motivation behind this is for archival's sake, and that means storing in as high quality as is practical. obviously a lot of mixes, especially the old ones, aren't anywhere near 320, and that's fine, i just don't think we should be making anything lower quality than it is. but if something is lossless, then i think we should convert it down to a 320kbps mp3 (since most people cant tell between 320 and lossless anyways). let's be honest, the difference between something like 192 and 320 is only a couple tens of megabytes; i think that's space well spent for saving a bit of dubstep "history"
j_j wrote:^lol
Soundcloud | Twitter

User avatar
Sexual_Chocolate
Posts: 17019
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:57 pm
Location: Label A City

Re: ALPACAFILES

Post by Sexual_Chocolate » Tue Jul 03, 2012 1:57 am

just out of curiosity, has anyone spoken to deapoh?
Laszlo wrote:and yay, upon imparting his knowledge to his fellow Ninjas, Nevalo spoke wisely that when aggrieved by a woman thou shalt put it in her bum.
Soundcloud
https://labelarecs.bandcamp.com

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests