@ the lurkers
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Re: @ the lurkers
Just lazy.
Re: @ the lurkers
I don't get this, most bad advice gets stomped out by anyone of the more knowledgeable members within a couple posts usually.Impresario wrote: but a lot of times threads are either full of shit or there are too many opinions going around. Don't see any reason to throw my 2 cents around yet!
In fact, twice in the past month has an actual well known artist being discussed popped into a forum to correct someone making outlandish stupid claims about them.
Anywho, doesn't the fact lurkers can't vote kinda make this poll like halfway useless. I mean I get its aimed at both lurkers and people who also sign in but don't really do much but still.
11
and i'll drink myself to death or at least i'll drink myself to sleep
and chainsmoke my way through the gaps in between my aspirations and my apathy.
and i'll drink myself to death or at least i'll drink myself to sleep
and chainsmoke my way through the gaps in between my aspirations and my apathy.
Re: @ the lurkers
Dammit Double post.
11
and i'll drink myself to death or at least i'll drink myself to sleep
and chainsmoke my way through the gaps in between my aspirations and my apathy.
and i'll drink myself to death or at least i'll drink myself to sleep
and chainsmoke my way through the gaps in between my aspirations and my apathy.
- Sexual_Chocolate
- Posts: 17019
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:57 pm
- Location: Label A City
Re: @ the lurkers
better than "I dont come here because i am repulsed by ehbrums fat."ehbrums1 wrote:No, there shouldn't beHircine wrote:There should be an option for "I only come here because Hircine's latino swag is extremely sexy".

SoundcloudLaszlo wrote:and yay, upon imparting his knowledge to his fellow Ninjas, Nevalo spoke wisely that when aggrieved by a woman thou shalt put it in her bum.
https://labelarecs.bandcamp.com
- Electric_Head
- Posts: 16958
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 9:59 am
- Location: South of Africa
- Contact:
- Sexual_Chocolate
- Posts: 17019
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:57 pm
- Location: Label A City
Re: @ the lurkers
american fat.
SoundcloudLaszlo wrote:and yay, upon imparting his knowledge to his fellow Ninjas, Nevalo spoke wisely that when aggrieved by a woman thou shalt put it in her bum.
https://labelarecs.bandcamp.com
Re: @ the lurkers
Twice as wide as half his girthElectric_Head wrote:how fat is ehbrums?
I think this place could benefit from my creative style discussions looking at the facts and ideology behind certain approaches to production...sound design questions and mixdown questions and headphone/monitor recommendations will always be present, but honestly I really hunger for a good multipage discussion on theory based stuff...or even a good long heated argument about frequency range specifications and the such.
The issues we have are that by and large the 'regulars' on here are a very small (20~) core...the satellite users usually flit in and out with the aforementioned queries which are all well and good and are the lifeblood that keeps things moving but the lack of 'larger picture' discussions is something of a bugbear...paradoxically of course, if there were such large discussions would the satellite heads get involved or would it be the regulars chewing the fat?
- dr_cryptic
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 2:49 pm
- Location: SHEFFIELD
Re: @ the lurkers
Artie Fufkin wrote:There should be an option "I only come here to read macc's posts".
"






Re: @ the lurkers
I know I'm not a regular, but I'd love to see more discussions like that. Point me in the direction of some and I'll throw in whatever $.02 I can.wub wrote:Twice as wide as half his girthElectric_Head wrote:how fat is ehbrums?
I think this place could benefit from my creative style discussions looking at the facts and ideology behind certain approaches to production...sound design questions and mixdown questions and headphone/monitor recommendations will always be present, but honestly I really hunger for a good multipage discussion on theory based stuff...or even a good long heated argument about frequency range specifications and the such.
The issues we have are that by and large the 'regulars' on here are a very small (20~) core...the satellite users usually flit in and out with the aforementioned queries which are all well and good and are the lifeblood that keeps things moving but the lack of 'larger picture' discussions is something of a bugbear...paradoxically of course, if there were such large discussions would the satellite heads get involved or would it be the regulars chewing the fat?
- JTMMusicuk
- Posts: 3008
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 7:41 pm
- Location: Newcastle
- Contact:
Re: @ the lurkers
Although i havnt been around for too long, i lurked for a good while before i joined because there was good information to take for myself but it is quite an intimidating place for begginers.
I started lurking about two years ago or whenever it was when skrillex started making it big (coincidentally) and i remember every other thread being flamed with insults about him or asking for tuts on how to make his stuff...this was before the brostep thread got created obviously...
I think its pretty unavoidable though tbh, if people are arguing its because they think they know the correct answer...most of the time...you need to just wade through the arguing if you want to get the valuable info and obiovusly we have the production bible which is enough for alot of people to lurk for a good while without having to signup to get the answers to their questions. I used to just come on now and again to read up on EQing or compression and then go away for a weeks or months just creating new tunes and trying to use the information id learned which stopped me asking some terrible terrible questions.
You can still tell that this place is worth joining when lurking because tbh we really arent that bad...in every other production forum i've seen (bar Glitchhopforum) there has been alot of people just outright insulting each other with far less moderation and very offensive content aswell and that seems to be the going thing. The production forum is alot more chilled out then SNH..which is nice..
I would love to see more theory based questions and more alternative techniques like the stuff you post in the thinking out loud thread and hopefully that thread might spur more people towards the truely creative part of producing, thinking outside the box.
I started lurking about two years ago or whenever it was when skrillex started making it big (coincidentally) and i remember every other thread being flamed with insults about him or asking for tuts on how to make his stuff...this was before the brostep thread got created obviously...
I think its pretty unavoidable though tbh, if people are arguing its because they think they know the correct answer...most of the time...you need to just wade through the arguing if you want to get the valuable info and obiovusly we have the production bible which is enough for alot of people to lurk for a good while without having to signup to get the answers to their questions. I used to just come on now and again to read up on EQing or compression and then go away for a weeks or months just creating new tunes and trying to use the information id learned which stopped me asking some terrible terrible questions.
You can still tell that this place is worth joining when lurking because tbh we really arent that bad...in every other production forum i've seen (bar Glitchhopforum) there has been alot of people just outright insulting each other with far less moderation and very offensive content aswell and that seems to be the going thing. The production forum is alot more chilled out then SNH..which is nice..
I would love to see more theory based questions and more alternative techniques like the stuff you post in the thinking out loud thread and hopefully that thread might spur more people towards the truely creative part of producing, thinking outside the box.
Re: @ the lurkers
Electric_Head wrote:how fat is ehbrums?

Paypal me $2 for a .wav of Midnight
https://soundcloud.com/artend
https://soundcloud.com/artend
Dead Rats wrote:Mate, these chaps are lads.
Re: @ the lurkers
It's funny how the third option is being chosen as a joke, yet it holds a lot of truth, as far as i'm concerned. There's a lot of talent and knowledge on this forum, so i keep looking around from time to time, but people are so elitist, unfriendly and narrow minded here. Well, most of em.
Re: @ the lurkers
it would be nice if you could have discussions without being told you're mindlessly buying into hype or trends
alex bk-bk wrote:some of you lot chat bare shit
Re: @ the lurkers
Par for the course, sadly. In the same way that if you put enough monkeys in a room with typewriters you'll get Shakespeare, you put enough music geeks on a forum and eventually being 'cool' will be pushed whilst being a 'sheep' will be derided.chekov wrote:it would be nice if you could have discussions without being told you're mindlessly buying into hype or trends
Re: @ the lurkers
i click "keep me signed in" every time at home and my machine/browser/internet always boots me
often times i've taken the time to write quite a bit, only to push submit and be told "you need to sign in to visit this forum" and my text is gone even when i click back on the browser
i've taken to copying all my post before submitting
it drives me fucing nuts
but anyway maybe people lurk just cuz they don't want to post
have nothing to say
if the reason were legitimately that we're all repellant, repugnant assholes, well then they wouldn't even be lurking
i post because i'm a wound up, bored egomaniac who talks too much but has no friends IRL, so if you're the opposite of that it's probably a good thing
often times i've taken the time to write quite a bit, only to push submit and be told "you need to sign in to visit this forum" and my text is gone even when i click back on the browser
i've taken to copying all my post before submitting
it drives me fucing nuts
but anyway maybe people lurk just cuz they don't want to post
have nothing to say
if the reason were legitimately that we're all repellant, repugnant assholes, well then they wouldn't even be lurking
i post because i'm a wound up, bored egomaniac who talks too much but has no friends IRL, so if you're the opposite of that it's probably a good thing
Re: @ the lurkers
good way of putting itwub wrote:Par for the course, sadly. In the same way that if you put enough monkeys in a room with typewriters you'll get Shakespeare, you put enough music geeks on a forum and eventually being 'cool' will be pushed whilst being a 'sheep' will be derided.chekov wrote:it would be nice if you could have discussions without being told you're mindlessly buying into hype or trends

feels bad man
alex bk-bk wrote:some of you lot chat bare shit
Re: @ the lurkers
ive been browsing this forum nearly every day for 3 years. look at my post count. lol 

- Aufnahmewindwuschel
- Posts: 2143
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:38 pm
- Location: Antarctica
Re: @ the lurkers
i cant handle all the paradox created in this forum
- Electric_Head
- Posts: 16958
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 9:59 am
- Location: South of Africa
- Contact:
Re: @ the lurkers
Give me some of those baby back ribs, baby back ribs.ehbrums1 wrote:Electric_Head wrote:how fat is ehbrums?





Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests