Too Much EQ'ing
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Re: Too Much EQ'ing
haha ^^
Re: Too Much EQ'ing
Even though it is just a metaphor, it appears I have just done that! Now I have a perfectly good sound! I don't think I will ever be doing this much eqing ever again.goodeh wrote:sorry to potentially derail the thread, but i was thinking about the phrase 'polish a turd'. if you polish a turd to much, then you might rub away the turd so much that all you have left is polish. does this mean that if you keep trying to make something bad into something good so much, it actually turn into something good?
Re: Too Much EQ'ing
Sometimes when you try to polish a turd you might change the sound so that you can use it to something else. Like trying to make a midbass and you end up using the sound as some random percussive sound.
- Steve_French
- Posts: 863
- Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:04 pm
- Location: Bath
Re: Too Much EQ'ing
what the fuck do you use? OxiClean?MaZa1 wrote:Sometimes when you try to polish a turd you might change the sound so that you can use it to something else. Like trying to make a midbass and you end up using the sound as some random percussive sound.
- sunny_b_uk
- Posts: 899
- Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:48 am
- Location: Wolverhampton
Re: Too Much EQ'ing
9 EQ bands or 9 friggin EQ pluginsBassf4ce wrote:If you have to eq a sound to the point you have 9 Eq's is it even worth using that sound?

Re: Too Much EQ'ing
9 eq plugins and each of them have 7 bands I believe. I am using most of them for taking out single frequencies, so I may just be really bad at eqing. Also, second post would have your answer.sunny_b_uk wrote:9 EQ bands or 9 friggin EQ pluginsBassf4ce wrote:If you have to eq a sound to the point you have 9 Eq's is it even worth using that sound?
Bassf4ce wrote:Fruity's pram eq 2 has 7 bands, and usually I am getting rid of single freqs or low/high pass.OfficialDAPT wrote:Why are you using 9 EQ's? Let's say you are using an EQ3 (you probably are using an EQ8 but I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt.) That's still 27 boosts or cuts. I don't think I've ever EQ'ed that much on one sound... Surely you can just make the sound better in the given vsts that you are using? I can imagine that the sound is very prominent after cutting out so many frequencies.... So to answer your question, IMO no it's not worth using that sound.
Re: Too Much EQ'ing
Dude...you don't need to load a new EQ to cut multiple bands.
SunkLo wrote: If ragging on the 'shortcut to the top' mentality makes me a hater then shower me in haterade.
Re: Too Much EQ'ing
I am here to learn. what do I do in such an event?fragments wrote:Dude...you don't need to load a new EQ to cut multiple bands.
Re: Too Much EQ'ing
Most VST EQs I've dealt with have multiple bands. Use the Q to narrow or widen the bands, a really narrow Q on multiple bands will help you surgically remove unwanted frequencies. : )
SunkLo wrote: If ragging on the 'shortcut to the top' mentality makes me a hater then shower me in haterade.
Re: Too Much EQ'ing
In FL, a cool trick is to use edison on a sample of audio to identify harmonics and cut out unwanted frequencies with absolute precision. Try to get your head around Maximus aswell, it's a great compressor that puts FL's stock multiband compressor to shame, since you can choose the exact frequencies you want to compress, then you have a lot of compression and saturation option from then on.
There's no need for more than one eq, and Fl's parametric EQ2 is pretty much one of the best around.
There's no need for more than one eq, and Fl's parametric EQ2 is pretty much one of the best around.
Soundcloud
Video games are bad for you? That's what they said about rock n' roll - Shigeru Miyamoto
https://soundcloud.com/photonman
Video games are bad for you? That's what they said about rock n' roll - Shigeru Miyamoto
https://soundcloud.com/photonman
Re: Too Much EQ'ing
In FL, a cool trick is to use edison on a sample of audio to identify harmonics and cut out unwanted frequencies with absolute precision. Try to get your head around Maximus aswell, it's a great compressor that puts FL's stock multiband compressor to shame, since you can choose the exact frequencies you want to compress, then you have a lot of compression and saturation option from then on.
There's no need for more than one eq, and Fl's parametric EQ2 is pretty much one of the best around.
There's no need for more than one eq, and Fl's parametric EQ2 is pretty much one of the best around.
Soundcloud
Video games are bad for you? That's what they said about rock n' roll - Shigeru Miyamoto
https://soundcloud.com/photonman
Video games are bad for you? That's what they said about rock n' roll - Shigeru Miyamoto
https://soundcloud.com/photonman
Re: Too Much EQ'ing
Oh my god, who in the hell does not know what the q is? *facepalm* I said like 5 times I was taking out single freqs. Wouldn't imply that I am using very narrow q?fragments wrote:Most VST EQs I've dealt with have multiple bands. Use the Q to narrow or widen the bands, a really narrow Q on multiple bands will help you surgically remove unwanted frequencies. : )
Last edited by Bassf4ce on Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Too Much EQ'ing
Calm your tits
Paypal me $2 for a .wav of Midnight
https://soundcloud.com/artend
https://soundcloud.com/artend
Dead Rats wrote:Mate, these chaps are lads.
Re: Too Much EQ'ing
First, there are tons of people out there who have no idea what that is. Second, your first post made it sound like you know next to nothing TBH.Bassf4ce wrote:Oh my god, who in the hell does not know what the q is? *facepalm* I said like 5 times I was taking out single freqs. Wouldn't imply that I am using very narrow q?fragments wrote:Most VST EQs I've dealt with have multiple bands. Use the Q to narrow or widen the bands, a really narrow Q on multiple bands will help you surgically remove unwanted frequencies. : )

SunkLo wrote: If ragging on the 'shortcut to the top' mentality makes me a hater then shower me in haterade.
Re: Too Much EQ'ing
All of my eq's, for people to see. Not in order of the chain of fx.


Re: Too Much EQ'ing
7 of them are useless..
Paypal me $2 for a .wav of Midnight
https://soundcloud.com/artend
https://soundcloud.com/artend
Dead Rats wrote:Mate, these chaps are lads.
Re: Too Much EQ'ing
Sorry for freaking out on ya.fragments wrote:First, there are tons of people out there who have no idea what that is. Second, your first post made it sound like you know next to nothing TBH.Bassf4ce wrote:Oh my god, who in the hell does not know what the q is? *facepalm* I said like 5 times I was taking out single freqs. Wouldn't imply that I am using very narrow q?fragments wrote:Most VST EQs I've dealt with have multiple bands. Use the Q to narrow or widen the bands, a really narrow Q on multiple bands will help you surgically remove unwanted frequencies. : )
Re: Too Much EQ'ing
No worries. But yea...overall if you are EQ'ing that much out of a sound...get a new sound...or your mix is already too full if you can't shoe horn in that last element. That's just IMO of course.
And by the looks of those EQs it looks like you are cutting in the same freq ranges multiple times? Just looks like a mess to me. At least for me...when shit starts getting that complex I go back and reconsider the sample/sound design.
And by the looks of those EQs it looks like you are cutting in the same freq ranges multiple times? Just looks like a mess to me. At least for me...when shit starts getting that complex I go back and reconsider the sample/sound design.
SunkLo wrote: If ragging on the 'shortcut to the top' mentality makes me a hater then shower me in haterade.
Re: Too Much EQ'ing
only time i been using more than 1 eq is to eq click out of subs that were gated. i assume it works better than 1 because you only get -12db in ableton's eq8. not sure how the math works or anything, but it works to my ears! but yeah dude, you went waaaaay overboard there. esp since you hp'd and lp'd and cut/boosted everything in between!!!
Re: Too Much EQ'ing
I only boosted cause I thought/think, since I am cutting shouldn't I boost a few things to balance it out?drake89 wrote:only time i been using more than 1 eq is to eq click out of subs that were gated. i assume it works better than 1 because you only get -12db in ableton's eq8. not sure how the math works or anything, but it works to my ears! but yeah dude, you went waaaaay overboard there. esp since you hp'd and lp'd and cut/boosted everything in between!!!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests