No cameras tonight at FWD>>/RINSE @ The End

debate, appreciation, interviews, reviews (events or releases), videos, radio shows
User avatar
dj slums
Permanent Vacation
Posts: 552
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 12:18 am
Location: your mum

Post by dj slums » Fri Aug 17, 2007 9:16 pm

The Wiggle Baron wrote:
Wouldnt mind hearing the justification for this. Sure its just me being a twat end, but does remind me of the whole rinse claiming copyright to their shows to stop deapoh putting em up on barefiles.
thats exactly what i though right away. they fucking think theyre royalty or somthing. fuck right off. head too big for venue? i think sooo...

User avatar
dj slums
Permanent Vacation
Posts: 552
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 12:18 am
Location: your mum

Post by dj slums » Fri Aug 17, 2007 9:29 pm

i978 wrote:I can't think of one reason for not allowing cameras in the club. And don't give me any "the flash distracts the deehjhays as they mix" bullshit. Seems it was perfectly acceptable for photos to be taken (and posted on the forum) when some free publicity was needed to hype up the night. Do the precious artists need to "protect their image" perhaps? Inflated sense of self importance methinks.

Dubstep used to be something everyone cold feel part of. Seems to me Rinse/Fwd are trying to turn it into something you consume.

I was going to go tonight but I can't bring myself to hand over my cash to people who seem to be acting more and more like stnuc.
init. majority of stuff i hear about them makes me think "what stnuc."

User avatar
ory
Posts: 1429
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 2:50 pm

Post by ory » Fri Aug 17, 2007 10:33 pm

So what's this all about then?

opwolf
Posts: 165
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 10:06 pm

Post by opwolf » Fri Aug 17, 2007 10:38 pm

Prince must be making a guest appearance.

kamaflage
Posts: 66
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 5:25 pm
Location: Blackbird Leys, Oxford
Contact:

Post by kamaflage » Fri Aug 17, 2007 10:49 pm

So at first I was like

"No CCTV tonight"

which would help me get away with toking in there...

Then I thought, thats not very secure.

Then I read the thread and thought what the fuck?

Everyone has a camera on the back of their phone!

Am I allowed to send a text message? Or might that look like I was taking a sneaky JPEG.

WTF.

Fwd. End? Fix up.



I can't go anyway, gotta babysit. Pah!!! :evil:
Mikee @ Kamaflage Koncept

+ 4 4 ( 0 ) 7 7 6 3 3 8 3 6 2 7

http://www.myspace.com/jungledrumnbass

c e n t r i f u g a l s o u n d @ g m a i l . c o m

User avatar
frodo
Posts: 1960
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 9:51 pm
Location: Reykjavík / London / Perth
Contact:

Post by frodo » Fri Aug 17, 2007 11:40 pm

Stupid.

User avatar
ajantis_art
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 10:44 am
Location: new cross/ norwich
Contact:

Post by ajantis_art » Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:03 am

i must admit i find it slightly annoying when you go out only to be surrounded by groups of people taking bare photos for their facebook/myspace/blogs. But this is fucking ridiculous, people are paying whatever it is on the door and you're not letting them document their night. bit of a piss take really i think :roll:

scoz
Posts: 326
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 4:26 pm
Location: Liverpool

Post by scoz » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:32 am


fooishbar
Posts: 1557
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:16 am
Location: london
Contact:

Post by fooishbar » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:36 am

to be fair, it can be pretty annoying if you've got flashes all night.

User avatar
will
Posts: 542
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:31 am
Location: London

Post by will » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:46 am

whats the reasoning for this exactly?

ridiculous rule - you should be ashamed FWD

User avatar
umkhontowesizwe
Posts: 803
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 3:58 pm

Post by umkhontowesizwe » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:51 am

this is nuts. people getting chucked out for wanting to document their night out? fuck me.

User avatar
unempty
Posts: 467
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 9:07 pm
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Post by unempty » Sat Aug 18, 2007 10:04 am

Makes me wanna get on a plane, cross the pond just so I can turn around at the door. Or maybe just build one of these in the club.

No cameras.. pfff... That's some uppity shit right there. How about asking people to not use flash if that's the problem? Y'know, politely and stuff.

Are patrons allowed to remember their night, or is there a retinal release form as well?

Big up MC Blair, DJ Cheney and the fascist massive! Going strong, undocumented!

User avatar
Dj_Sith
Posts: 427
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 11:39 am
Location: aka D-T from Corunha, Spain
Contact:

Post by Dj_Sith » Sat Aug 18, 2007 11:10 am

i'm from spain... i pay 100 euros or more to get a plane, and affor some nights in a hostel, and pay the ticket, and go to a party just to live a really big dubstep show, and now i can't take photos of me and my friends on the party?

i think this is not fair

on september i will go to DMZ i wish i can take some photos there.
==D-T==[a.k.a. DJ SITH]
- Nothing is True, Everything is allowed. Hassan-Bin-Sabbah
Saturdays 6-8PM GMT on http://cybaradio.com
Image

User avatar
fushimi
Posts: 742
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: Kyoto

Post by fushimi » Sat Aug 18, 2007 11:32 am

Cristal and Mastercard in association with Sony proudly present P Diddy's Red Bull FWD Birthday Party*

Featuring DJ Battles:

Sienna Miller vs. N-TYPE
Lindsay Lohan vs. Youngster
and:
funky house Geeneus vs. original Geeneus







*No cameras allowed, rights have been sold to Hello Magazine

jamie
Posts: 280
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 5:31 pm
Location: Notts, UK
Contact:

Post by jamie » Sat Aug 18, 2007 12:06 pm

Ha! What a crock of old shite, good ol LDN eh? Video cameras I can understand, doing video work and photography I've been in situations where I've been asked to stop filming cos the artists are contracted to a certain media company or they're playing purely dubs and dont want the sound recorded - but photos? You've got to have your head so far up your own arse you're licking ears to have a contract like that....or of course it could be the venue, but that makes even less sense unless there's been a banning order like they're trying to do in NYC (which still wouldnt effect a night like this) Or someone's paying a photographer to come in and dont want anyone else to have coverage of the event - RWD? Guardian? Times?. It's all bullshit at the end of the day...

User avatar
umkhontowesizwe
Posts: 803
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 3:58 pm

Post by umkhontowesizwe » Sat Aug 18, 2007 12:22 pm

Jamie wrote:....or of course it could be the venue
"we have asked the end to keep the venue camera free for us for tonight"

definitely not the venue.

still absolutely baffled by this. surely it would have been common sense/courtesy for the FWD camp to include the reasons behind it in the original statement?

masstronaut
Posts: 1067
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 6:37 pm

Post by masstronaut » Sat Aug 18, 2007 12:34 pm

Sounds a bit shifty but might it have something to do with the smoking ban?

You know, if a high profile club wants to go easy on the smokers then maybe loads of cameras at a night aren't such a good idea. Just a thought.
BlizzardMusic wrote:'in your face you miserable tosser'

masstronaut
Posts: 1067
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 6:37 pm

Post by masstronaut » Sat Aug 18, 2007 12:43 pm

I think I'm being way too generous innit.
BlizzardMusic wrote:'in your face you miserable tosser'

guerillaeye
Posts: 1871
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:56 pm
Location: NEPA

Post by guerillaeye » Sat Aug 18, 2007 12:46 pm

scoz wrote:maybe whoever recently read http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... 63,00.html
give that guy the pulitzer.

ozols man
Posts: 1091
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 11:52 pm

Post by ozols man » Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:02 pm

guerillaeye wrote:
scoz wrote:maybe whoever recently read http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... 63,00.html
give that guy the pulitzer.
u can tell that bloke has been through some traumas

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests