When writing a song what's the first thing YOU go to?
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Re: When writing a song what's the first thing YOU go to?
I start with the drums, though I should start with the bass. All my drums are basically extended drumsolos which is hard to write around.
I should start with my basses to get a basic rhythm for my drums to go crazy over. My music isn't melodic and it's not what I aim for, so my melodic stuff really only ties things together into a tune
I should start with my basses to get a basic rhythm for my drums to go crazy over. My music isn't melodic and it's not what I aim for, so my melodic stuff really only ties things together into a tune

namsayin
:'0
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 7:06 am
Re: When writing a song what's the first thing YOU go to?
usually when writing I like to get a good beat going. Although making the drop of a song first is also good. I think that really it depends and you could start with any different element
- Turnipish_Thoughts
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 12:34 pm
Re: When writing a song what's the first thing YOU go to?
I tend to get most inspired when I listen to, or passively hear something that inspires me (duh). So what I've started doing is hunting down where that bit of music I heard on an advert, or film or [insert generic media here] is originally sourced from and load it up in my daw.
I'll then deconstruct the harmonies, rhythm, melody e.t.c. (say if it's a pretty complex piano/orchestral melody/piece) so I can 'see' it's innards in front of me.
I'll then do a lot of thinking and experimenting in regard to the underlying motifs I've uncovered and do my best to develop them and take them in my own direction. When re-creating it I'll tend to try and mimic the original sound as closely as possible and then when I'm developing it I'll experiment with different timbres/rhythms e.t.c. I think will compliment the intended emotional message. To extend this, I also think it's important to experiment with different interval relationships within the melody and harmonies (which often take the vibe in a drastically new direction)
Wether I use an accompanying drum track is dependent on whether I think the piece sounds like it needs it at that point, which involves trying it out and comparing it to what I think it's trying to 'say' with what a given drum track does to it. If it doesn't work I'll leave off the drums until it's more defined as an idea. The same goes for specific timbres, textures, intervals, rhythms e.t.c. All the while I'm basically trying stuff and assessing wether it's adding to the collection of ideas in a coherent manner, or confusing the message.
That's the point of this step. It's analogous to a sculptor hacking bits of clay out of a block and smushing bits around in a mediation between creative accidents and careful deconstruction of what's actually happening in that relationship between the artist and the piece, in order to form an over all concept.
I restrict myself through this process by making myself not worry too much about complex sound design, the fidelity of engineering and all the other delicate, detailed technical processes because I think this massively hinders creative mindfulness.
I'll generally try to do this over 1 or 2 sessions while the original inspiration is still fresh. But once I've got to a point where I can think "yeah this has a strong identity" I'll save it, bounce out what I've done and spend a few days listening to it on and off (not too much because there's a danger of getting sick of it). While I'm doing this I'll think about how all the elements interact, focus down critically on certain things that are sticking out in a good or bad way and develop them further mentally. The more I listen to this 'proof of concept' piece the more I'll hear it 'better' in my mind until there's a definite and solid set of things I want to do and directions I want to take it. Here I'll be thinking a lot more about sound design, fidelity, groove and all the other semi fine details.
I'll then open the project. Copy out 1 element I want to revise at a time and work on developing that piece alone, out of the context of the song. This is what I'd class as the 'sound design' sessions where I'm not thinking about the song, I know where it wants to go, I know what i want things to sound like, and I'm working on those sounds alone, giving them justice without worrying about the bigger picture. These sessions will last a while where I'll do my best to get the different elements 'finished' and then pull them back into the track and put them back in place. I'll keep doing this till I've got to a second 'plateau' and I'll do the same as I did before. Bounce it out, listen to it for a while, think, imagine and develop.
Eventually it comes down to tweaking the little bits, adding little fx and the more subtle little atmospheric elements that gives it a fuller and more finished feeling. The problem with me is I seldom get to a 'finished' point with a tune because through the whole revision/sound design process I'll get inspired by something else and drop the current project which inevitably ends up on my SC as some unfinished half track 'concept'
But this is my general workflow, which I've got to man up and stick to much more than I do...
I'll then deconstruct the harmonies, rhythm, melody e.t.c. (say if it's a pretty complex piano/orchestral melody/piece) so I can 'see' it's innards in front of me.
I'll then do a lot of thinking and experimenting in regard to the underlying motifs I've uncovered and do my best to develop them and take them in my own direction. When re-creating it I'll tend to try and mimic the original sound as closely as possible and then when I'm developing it I'll experiment with different timbres/rhythms e.t.c. I think will compliment the intended emotional message. To extend this, I also think it's important to experiment with different interval relationships within the melody and harmonies (which often take the vibe in a drastically new direction)
Wether I use an accompanying drum track is dependent on whether I think the piece sounds like it needs it at that point, which involves trying it out and comparing it to what I think it's trying to 'say' with what a given drum track does to it. If it doesn't work I'll leave off the drums until it's more defined as an idea. The same goes for specific timbres, textures, intervals, rhythms e.t.c. All the while I'm basically trying stuff and assessing wether it's adding to the collection of ideas in a coherent manner, or confusing the message.
That's the point of this step. It's analogous to a sculptor hacking bits of clay out of a block and smushing bits around in a mediation between creative accidents and careful deconstruction of what's actually happening in that relationship between the artist and the piece, in order to form an over all concept.
I restrict myself through this process by making myself not worry too much about complex sound design, the fidelity of engineering and all the other delicate, detailed technical processes because I think this massively hinders creative mindfulness.
I'll generally try to do this over 1 or 2 sessions while the original inspiration is still fresh. But once I've got to a point where I can think "yeah this has a strong identity" I'll save it, bounce out what I've done and spend a few days listening to it on and off (not too much because there's a danger of getting sick of it). While I'm doing this I'll think about how all the elements interact, focus down critically on certain things that are sticking out in a good or bad way and develop them further mentally. The more I listen to this 'proof of concept' piece the more I'll hear it 'better' in my mind until there's a definite and solid set of things I want to do and directions I want to take it. Here I'll be thinking a lot more about sound design, fidelity, groove and all the other semi fine details.
I'll then open the project. Copy out 1 element I want to revise at a time and work on developing that piece alone, out of the context of the song. This is what I'd class as the 'sound design' sessions where I'm not thinking about the song, I know where it wants to go, I know what i want things to sound like, and I'm working on those sounds alone, giving them justice without worrying about the bigger picture. These sessions will last a while where I'll do my best to get the different elements 'finished' and then pull them back into the track and put them back in place. I'll keep doing this till I've got to a second 'plateau' and I'll do the same as I did before. Bounce it out, listen to it for a while, think, imagine and develop.
Eventually it comes down to tweaking the little bits, adding little fx and the more subtle little atmospheric elements that gives it a fuller and more finished feeling. The problem with me is I seldom get to a 'finished' point with a tune because through the whole revision/sound design process I'll get inspired by something else and drop the current project which inevitably ends up on my SC as some unfinished half track 'concept'

Soundcloud

Serious shit^Altron wrote:The big part is just getting your arrangement down.
Brothulhu wrote:...EQing with the subtlety of a drunk viking lumberjack

- Taiken
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:42 am
- Location: Switzerland / St. Gallen / Basel
- Contact:
Re: When writing a song what's the first thing YOU go to?
I mainly start with the drums & work on them for ages.
After that, i create the sub & put those two together so they fit.
Thats the point where i get a picture of what i'm heading at (if i don't start with an straight idea) - Will it be stepping, slow, dark, happy, deep or whatever.
I work on that combination till i think its the right direction, after that i try to do a main melody or try to support and push that basic feeling of the song with pads and stuff.
When i got a fresh loop with all that, i start with the song intro, structure, sound design, drops and try to advance those ideas.
I start with the drums because i think its one of the most important parts.
If you got a sandwich with a waste of a bread, it will never taste good whatever filling you have
If you have a fresh track with lame drums, it never will reach his full potential (of course this also works in the opposite direction).
But if have to say, Rhythm was (and always will be), one of the most important things in music to me.
And maybe this will cause in similar results while producing.
I think the idea of starting with a piano & the melody is very interesting, i will defo give it a shoot!
After that, i create the sub & put those two together so they fit.
Thats the point where i get a picture of what i'm heading at (if i don't start with an straight idea) - Will it be stepping, slow, dark, happy, deep or whatever.
I work on that combination till i think its the right direction, after that i try to do a main melody or try to support and push that basic feeling of the song with pads and stuff.
When i got a fresh loop with all that, i start with the song intro, structure, sound design, drops and try to advance those ideas.
I start with the drums because i think its one of the most important parts.
If you got a sandwich with a waste of a bread, it will never taste good whatever filling you have

If you have a fresh track with lame drums, it never will reach his full potential (of course this also works in the opposite direction).
But if have to say, Rhythm was (and always will be), one of the most important things in music to me.
And maybe this will cause in similar results while producing.
I think the idea of starting with a piano & the melody is very interesting, i will defo give it a shoot!
TENGU SOUNDSYSTEM // TENGU COLLECTIVE
Links
http://soundcloud.com/djtaiken
http://tengucollective.ch/
Links
http://soundcloud.com/djtaiken
http://tengucollective.ch/
Re: When writing a song what's the first thing YOU go to?
I don't think there is a wrong or right way to do it, and I don't think anyone can say it's 'wrong' to start with drums. Seeing as the music I make is very heavily centered around drums and bass, that's where I start - with drums and bass. I usually get a 16/32 bar loop or something going, then make a groove with drums/bass/samples/atmospherics then I make melodies to go with that. For me the 'groove' is the important thing with all the elements fitting into the groove and playing nicely with eachother.
- syrup
- Reigning Mini-Mix King
- Posts: 8351
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 2:18 pm
- Location: down in my heart
Re: When writing a song what's the first thing YOU go to?
plug in my soundcard
dubfordessert wrote:you can jizz on me if you want
- Electric_Head
- Posts: 16958
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 9:59 am
- Location: South of Africa
- Contact:
Re: When writing a song what's the first thing YOU go to?
Really?johney wrote:plug in my soundcard
Every time?
My Interface is always plugged in.





- syrup
- Reigning Mini-Mix King
- Posts: 8351
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 2:18 pm
- Location: down in my heart
Re: When writing a song what's the first thing YOU go to?
yeah i have a laptop and move it around quite a lot, so soundcard sticking out isn't great
dubfordessert wrote:you can jizz on me if you want
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests