things just happen... imo
I mean, who cares about the world if you have a lot of dank in the bank
EDIT:
although, maybe if you want to keep that dank in bank, you might wanna start a conspiracy....
FUCK

When I first found this place I was like the fuck is this shit. Everytime I come back here I'm still like the fuck is this shit.
it was from that BBC article cited earlier - i didnt read any aussie papers though, so they might have it wrong.sd5 wrote:Haven't heard her say this; in fact her ministers have said the opposite: that he's entitled to his rights as an Australian citizen.triky wrote:"Julia Gillard has been making it virtually impossible for Assange to return to Australia where he is entitled to be. And she has even threatened to cancel his passport."
this is from that BBC article... You can't cancel someone's passport and make them stateless. That's a statement worthy of Palin if I ever heard one. Is this woman really PM ??
you're a smart guy mate, you've gotta do better than that...hackman wrote: and to assume that evidence and facts about a conspiracy would be available is just ludicrous
noam wrote:you're a smart guy mate, you've gotta do better than that...hackman wrote: and to assume that evidence and facts about a conspiracy would be available is just ludicrous
one word. Watergate.
goodnight.
Soundcloudfinji wrote:Hey hackman your a fucking nutter
...hackman wrote: watergate wasn't a conspiracy
themuthafuggindictionarybitch wrote:con·spir·a·cy
/kənˈspɪrəsi/ Show Spelled[kuhn-spir-uh-see] Show IPA
–noun, plural -cies.
1.
the act of conspiring.
2.
an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.
3.
a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose: He joined the conspiracy to overthrow the government.
hackman wrote:noam wrote:you're a smart guy mate, you've gotta do better than that...hackman wrote: and to assume that evidence and facts about a conspiracy would be available is just ludicrous
one word. Watergate.
goodnight.
watergate wasn't a conspiracy, just standard crooked politicians
Soundcloudfinji wrote:Hey hackman your a fucking nutter
Soundcloudfinji wrote:Hey hackman your a fucking nutter
noam wrote:that doesn't make sense. you're saying something DEFINITELY exists but you have no evidence for it existing. im saying there is a possibility but i have no reason to believe it because there's no evidence.
ask literally ANY room full of people, bar fervent religious fanatics, which of the above two concepts makes sense and what do you think the answer will be...?
seriously man.
this has got to the point where its an argument about logic and language.
accept that what you want to believe is true is a possible truth: not a definitive one.
Soundcloudfinji wrote:Hey hackman your a fucking nutter
Soundcloudfinji wrote:Hey hackman your a fucking nutter
When I first found this place I was like the fuck is this shit. Everytime I come back here I'm still like the fuck is this shit.
Well so far the only hacking that has been done is possibly by the guy who is accused of stealing the documents by gaining unauthorised access to files.2manynoobs wrote:ok so we've got on the one hand:
hackers who want to risk their balls, hacking mastercard just because they believe in free, untainted media.
on the other hand we have:
governments that want to ban/control the internet who use hackers as an excuse: "oh it's so dangerous, hack0rz gun' hack your mastercard biz, stealin' yo moneys, you still want free media?"
more views on this?? anyone?
that DynCorp article is harrowing. . .AllNightDayDream wrote:New leak, sickening stuff
Some interesting news. Seems like wikileaks is splitting, or at least a new organization has popped up.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests