Ham Art. (New pieces)

djelements · Post by **djelements** » Thu Jun 19, 2008 10:33 am

BLZDub wrote:

:O

dubluke · Post by **dubluke** » Thu Jun 19, 2008 12:13 pm

i love ham in the face and on my hands

d_three · Post by **d_three** » Sun Jul 13, 2008 12:23 pm

Seriously Cheaper!

kidlogic · Post by **kidlogic** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:05 am

d.three wrote:
Seriously Cheaper!

An looook... ees only waaaaaafer theeen!

badger · Post by **badger** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 9:27 am

i don't understand why wafer thin ham exists. given the choice between lots of ham and a measly thin bit of ham who in their right mind would choose the wafer thin option? maybe it's only there for those not sound of mind

nfektd_kid · Post by **nfektd_kid** » Tue Jul 15, 2008 12:32 pm

lets not forget Ham Solo

badger · Post by **badger** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:59 pm

bump... just because

happy, ham filled, times

kay · Post by **kay** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:19 pm

badger wrote:i don't understand why wafer thin ham exists. given the choice between lots of ham and a measly thin bit of ham who in their right mind would choose the wafer thin option? maybe it's only there for those not sound of mind

I think it's all in putting lots and lots and lots of folds of measly thin bits of ham. So you get folded-ham-layer-biting goodness.

badger · Post by **badger** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:21 pm

kay wrote:
badger wrote:i don't understand why wafer thin ham exists. given the choice between lots of ham and a measly thin bit of ham who in their right mind would choose the wafer thin option? maybe it's only there for those not sound of mind
I think it's all in putting lots and lots and lots of folds of measly thin bits of ham. So you get folded-ham-layer-biting goodness.

fuck layers

you need proper ham depth or you aren't feeling it properly

PS- i dont think i can ever post again

Posts: 12345

fractal · Post by **fractal** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:27 pm

rereading this thread whilst listening to hackman's fist of ham

leebass · Post by **leebass** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:30 pm

badger wrote:i don't understand why wafer thin ham exists. given the choice between lots of ham and a measly thin bit of ham who in their right mind would choose the wafer thin option? maybe it's only there for those not sound of mind

Because it doesn't actually contain much ham and so is pretty cheap, budget ham! I agree though, it doesn't even taste of ham, maybe it's to trick your brain into believing you're eating ham because it's pink and ham-textured, and so you can pretend you're eating a delicious ham sandwich when really it's just bread and a pink, watery, slippery, inferior, ham-textured substance.

Also, smoked ham or no ham.

__________ · Post by **__________** » Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:53 am

dubluke wrote:an image of mecca edited to look like ham

seckle wrote:community discussion is critically important for issues as big and volatile as this.

The glory days of dsf

Ham Art. (New pieces)

Re: Ham Art. (New pieces)

Re:

Re: Ham Art. (New pieces)

Re: Ham Art. (New pieces)

Re:

Re:

Who is online