Illegally Downloading Music

Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.

Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
User avatar
garethom
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:55 pm
Location: Birmz
Contact:

Re: Illegally Downloading Music

Post by garethom » Mon Jan 09, 2012 10:29 am

Soiree wrote:i just got tipped off to the mother ship of EDM uploads, i guess i should turn myself in for stealing.
if i ever see any of the tunes i love on wax, i pony up on the spot, why not check it out first, test it out on the crowd? i love so much music, if i paid for all of it, i'd be broke all the time. beside dropping tunes that are not widely available is a very good feeling.
I know I said I was done with this thread, but I definitely don't agree with playing pirated stuff out, moreso if you're getting paid for it! There's pirating stuff for home listening, then there's pirating stuff and making money off the back of it.

User avatar
brasco
Posts: 3092
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:01 pm
Location: Sussex

Re: Illegally Downloading Music

Post by brasco » Mon Jan 09, 2012 10:57 am

This argument that downloading music is too expensive, I am poor, I'd be broke etc is weak as fuck
Soundcloud
incnic wrote:pictire disc ones track harder than the black ones due to the colopured pgment being magnetsed for the stylus

User avatar
Duffman
Posts: 1348
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 8:39 pm
Location: Norn Ireland

Re: Illegally Downloading Music

Post by Duffman » Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:08 am

Pedro Sánchez wrote:Why is this thread back in SNH? is the SNH a dumping ground :lol:
lol did this thread get moved to general? :cornlol:

Completely forgot about this thread, it's nice to see I helped fuel some pointless arguments though >_>
Image
danrev wrote:A cat called Minton eats a shuttlecock. Bad Minton.

leyenda
Posts: 2243
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:08 pm

Re: Illegally Downloading Music

Post by leyenda » Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:33 am

Duffman wrote:Completely forgot about this thread, it's nice to see I helped fuel some pointless arguments though >_>
That's some first class trolling there Duffman :W:
Shum wrote:
Nevalo wrote:not much todo at work today.... and once ive finished, ITS THE FUCKIN LONG WEEKEND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yeah big up Jesus for dying for our sins and netting us a public holiday in the process.

Also, hot cross buns.

User avatar
Kochari
Posts: 2504
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 12:23 am
Location: quietly continuing

Re: Illegally Downloading Music

Post by Kochari » Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:34 pm

You guys have to learn how to have a constructive argument. I may not agree with what Allnightdaydream is saying, but that's what makes his argument all the more interesting, because he IS consistently providing well thought out, logical arguments. And you guys just say he's being obtuse for using sources.
My name is Dom and I like making ambientish music and drinking tea. Nice to meet you.

Soundcloud

Kid Lazarus - Kochari - Free music

User avatar
Today
Posts: 2653
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 9:14 pm
Location: New York

Re: Illegally Downloading Music

Post by Today » Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:45 pm

Kochari wrote:You guys have to learn how to have a constructive argument. I may not agree with what Allnightdaydream is saying, but that's what makes his argument all the more interesting, because he IS consistently providing well thought out, logical arguments. And you guys just say he's being obtuse for using sources.
:z:
dubstep Soundcloud

rock
Soundcloud

scspkr99
Posts: 1998
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 11:55 am

Re: Illegally Downloading Music

Post by scspkr99 » Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:51 pm

Kochari wrote:You guys have to learn how to have a constructive argument. I may not agree with what Allnightdaydream is saying, but that's what makes his argument all the more interesting, because he IS consistently providing well thought out, logical arguments. And you guys just say he's being obtuse for using sources.
They don't and he doesn't.

It's the pointlessness of arguing from differing moral frameworks. If you don't consider an action in contravention of your own morality then arguing the toss with someone who does is pointless.

User avatar
Laszlo
Posts: 3845
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 10:31 am

Re: Illegally Downloading Music

Post by Laszlo » Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:15 pm

...and yet this went on for 14 pages.
Yay DSF!

User avatar
garethom
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:55 pm
Location: Birmz
Contact:

Re: Illegally Downloading Music

Post by garethom » Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:22 pm

Laszlo wrote:...and yet this went on for 14 pages.
Yay DSF!
Sorry for forcing you to read. The one line it took up on the board must've really stressed you out. Out to you for your patience at this testing time. :Q:

User avatar
Today
Posts: 2653
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 9:14 pm
Location: New York

Re: Illegally Downloading Music

Post by Today » Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:28 pm

its not always horrible to consider other people's POVs/moral frameworks

i admit a lot of responses here made me reconsider. I'm still against theft, and it still has mostly to do with the fact that i make a living off intellectual property. But there's all kinds of scenarios too, that i wasn't aware of. So i don't think there's anything wrong with this thread per se.
There've been much worse. remember the dma's
dubstep Soundcloud

rock
Soundcloud

User avatar
Laszlo
Posts: 3845
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 10:31 am

Re: Illegally Downloading Music

Post by Laszlo » Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:29 pm

Was kinda car-crash reading - had to rubber-neck at what the fuck y'all had to talk about for this long. Then there was the added intrigue of it being shifted from here to general and back again.
Also, this thread has been done at least three times in recent months but this one got the furthest.

Reason enough to read.

Don't be such a sarcy tnuc.

User avatar
brasco
Posts: 3092
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:01 pm
Location: Sussex

Re: Illegally Downloading Music

Post by brasco » Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:37 pm

Today wrote: remember the dma's
I hear 2012 dmas are in usa, and in march :h:
Soundcloud
incnic wrote:pictire disc ones track harder than the black ones due to the colopured pgment being magnetsed for the stylus

User avatar
garethom
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:55 pm
Location: Birmz
Contact:

Re: Illegally Downloading Music

Post by garethom » Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:38 pm

DSF would just be a nicer place if there wasn't half as much moaning about stuff that is easily avoidable by just not clicking a link.

You know this discussion has been done before, you know how it would end up (hence why I dropped out), you knew what to expect. Despite what some people think, it's not cool to moan about DSF haha. It's a great place.

User avatar
seckle
Posts: 12404
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 7:58 pm

Re: Illegally Downloading Music

Post by seckle » Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:44 pm

AllNightDayDream wrote:
There are plenty reports.
And the one that everyone from the Pro-filesharing side always comes with first is the one from Harvard in 2004, based largely on mainstream barcoded/soundscan music. They reveal absolutely NOTHING about filesharing independent underground music. Most vinyl based indie music is not tabulated or barcoded, so the test groups being used for 95% of these "reports" don't matter. You cannot compare filesharing a britney spears single and filesharing an underground indie dubstep single. They're diametrically different, and the former relies on exposure from major radio and multi million dollar promotion. When you fileshare an established dubstep artist, we're talking about shoestring budgets. The effects of a dubplate being ripped and leaked early means that the producer probably breaks even if that at all.

If you want to justify stealing, claiming you have loads of reports that represent filesharing in relation to dubstep, you need to link us. Otherwise, its a house of cards.

User avatar
Laszlo
Posts: 3845
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 10:31 am

Re: Illegally Downloading Music

Post by Laszlo » Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:55 pm

garethom wrote:DSF would just be a nicer place if there wasn't half as much moaning about stuff that is easily avoidable by just not clicking a link.

You know this discussion has been done before, you know how it would end up (hence why I dropped out), you knew what to expect. Despite what some people think, it's not cool to moan about DSF haha. It's a great place.
All fair points. I completely agree, DSF is a great place, which is why such threads tend to irk me a little. I wouldn't have an issue at all if it wasn't for the fact that this thread has majoritively consisted of posts from people who have discussed this before (and got nowhere) and some guy who's avatar is 'the troll' ( -q- )

It just comes down to morality - there is no (truly) right or wrong answer, just opinions, which is why i'm amazed it got this far.
You're absolutely right though, I should have known better than to keep clicking on it.
Image

Addendum - I hope you don't think (or at least don't care) that there was any malice behind my use of the word 'tnuc'. Was just light-hearted.

:w:

User avatar
garethom
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 12:55 pm
Location: Birmz
Contact:

Re: Illegally Downloading Music

Post by garethom » Mon Jan 09, 2012 5:04 pm

Laszlo wrote:
garethom wrote:DSF would just be a nicer place if there wasn't half as much moaning about stuff that is easily avoidable by just not clicking a link.

You know this discussion has been done before, you know how it would end up (hence why I dropped out), you knew what to expect. Despite what some people think, it's not cool to moan about DSF haha. It's a great place.
All fair points. I completely agree, DSF is a great place, which is why such threads tend to irk me a little. I wouldn't have an issue at all if it wasn't for the fact that this thread has majoritively consisted of posts from people who have discussed this before (and got nowhere) and some guy who's avatar is 'the troll' ( -q- )

It just comes down to morality - there is no (truly) right or wrong answer, just opinions, which is why i'm amazed it got this far.
You're absolutely right though, I should have known better than to keep clicking on it.
Image

Addendum - I hope you don't think (or at least don't care) that there was any malice behind my use of the word 'tnuc'. Was just light-hearted.

:w:
:q: :q: :q: :q: :q: :q: ... Nah jokes, I knew! :4:

Guess these threads go on so much because people see how much work goes into stuff, and then some bod just thinks "I'm having that for free" haha. Anyway, I'll let others duke this one out! :Q:

User avatar
wearecorsairs
Posts: 171
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 9:47 pm
Location: Isle of Wight

Re: Illegally Downloading Music

Post by wearecorsairs » Mon Jan 09, 2012 5:55 pm

scspkr99 wrote:
Kochari wrote:You guys have to learn how to have a constructive argument. I may not agree with what Allnightdaydream is saying, but that's what makes his argument all the more interesting, because he IS consistently providing well thought out, logical arguments. And you guys just say he's being obtuse for using sources.
They don't and he doesn't.

It's the pointlessness of arguing from differing moral frameworks. If you don't consider an action in contravention of your own morality then arguing the toss with someone who does is pointless.
thankyou.
i learn't many moons ago that you aren't going to change peoples opinions on this matter.
people can do what they want, think for themselves!

p.s. my avatar is the troll cos i used to be one but grew up

Soundcloud
Corsairs.

User avatar
seckle
Posts: 12404
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 7:58 pm

Re: Illegally Downloading Music

Post by seckle » Mon Jan 09, 2012 6:17 pm

collige wrote:
seckle wrote:i challenge you to find any rare dance music left on the planet right now that you can't hear a clip of or sample on youtube/itunes/amazon/surus, or any of the other stores, before even going to torrents or the net in general to pirate it.

that's one part of the pro-piracy argument thats just void. 5 years ago, i would say it had some grounds, but now...no way. there's absolutely no grounds left to stand on in terms of not being able to sample/hear music you really want to check out first, before buying.
Plenty of old vinyl only releases are only on youtube or up for pirate on the internet. Seeing as you hate unauthorized Youtube uploading channels, I'll exclude those. Given that, where can I legally listen to, say, Loefah - Jazz Lick?
listen on DSF or listen on youtube on your own? yes, DSF bans youtube collections, chiefly because we've had labels and producers come at us over the years complaining that these channels are getting adsense money off their hard work! youtube collection channels and their motivations to collect huge archives of tunes is shady at best, when they run adsense on each video. again, its entitlement.

your argument here is silly, as jazz lick is on youtube right now. you can hear the entire tune. its a classic that is worth the money tracking down on vinyl. Are you going to now argue that Loefah's not going to get the money if you buy it on discogs? i love that one too.

how many hoops do people need to jump through to prove to the world that their hard drive collection is more important than supporting the community financially?

User avatar
wearecorsairs
Posts: 171
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 9:47 pm
Location: Isle of Wight

Re: Illegally Downloading Music

Post by wearecorsairs » Mon Jan 09, 2012 6:19 pm

i totally agree about youtube, if anyone puts my music up on their youtube i'm gonna fuckign find out where they live
i will put my music on my youtube channel, it isnt anyone elses!
Soundcloud
Corsairs.

User avatar
fractal
Mako
Posts: 12133
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:58 pm
Location: emerald city, cascadia

Re: Illegally Downloading Music

Post by fractal » Mon Jan 09, 2012 7:04 pm

scspkr99 wrote:
Kochari wrote:You guys have to learn how to have a constructive argument. I may not agree with what Allnightdaydream is saying, but that's what makes his argument all the more interesting, because he IS consistently providing well thought out, logical arguments. And you guys just say he's being obtuse for using sources.
They don't and he doesn't.

It's the pointlessness of arguing from differing moral frameworks. If you don't consider an action in contravention of your own morality then arguing the toss with someone who does is pointless.
exactly this
sub.wise:.
slow down
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests