Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
-
phaelon
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 6:15 pm
- Location: NEPA
Post
by phaelon » Fri Sep 14, 2007 6:39 pm
-
drum syndicate
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 5:31 am
- Location: Berkeley, CA
-
Contact:
Post
by drum syndicate » Fri Sep 14, 2007 6:42 pm
The minority is the majority in this country now.
Game over for your LEGO heads
-
parson
- Posts: 11311
- Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:26 am
- Location: ATX
-
Contact:
Post
by parson » Fri Sep 14, 2007 6:53 pm
BAH
RESULTS
parson VS. parsons
parson 5,030,000
parsons 24,800,000
-
parson
- Posts: 11311
- Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:26 am
- Location: ATX
-
Contact:
Post
by parson » Fri Sep 14, 2007 6:53 pm
RESULTS
DUBSTEP VS. dubsteps
DUBSTEP 3,340,000
dubsteps 1,890
-
kate_
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2006 2:46 pm
- Location: North Carolina
-
Contact:
Post
by kate_ » Fri Sep 14, 2007 8:54 pm
If there were 2 Parsons, would they be 2 Texan or 2 Texans?
-
skavoovie_blind9
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 8:08 am
- Location: ManCHESTer
Post
by skavoovie_blind9 » Fri Sep 14, 2007 9:04 pm
If you lost more than one pair of glasses, would you say; "Have you seen my glasseses?"
-
chu
- Posts: 572
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 1:23 am
- Location: On it
-
Contact:
Post
by chu » Fri Sep 14, 2007 9:07 pm
If you were a fuckwit would you call your Lego 'Legos'?
-
shonky
- Posts: 9754
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 6:31 pm
Post
by shonky » Fri Sep 14, 2007 9:09 pm
Chu wrote:If you were a fuckwit would you call your Lego 'Legos'?
Apparently so
Hmm....

-
skavoovie_blind9
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 8:08 am
- Location: ManCHESTer
Post
by skavoovie_blind9 » Fri Sep 14, 2007 9:15 pm
The word 'LEGO', when used as a noun, should only refer to the company that makes the product. Otherwise 'LEGO' is supposed to be used as an adjective. Thus, when referring to the pieces, neither 'lego' nor 'legos' is correct... rather one should say: 'LEGO bricks' or 'LEGO pieces'
-
chu
- Posts: 572
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 1:23 am
- Location: On it
-
Contact:
Post
by chu » Fri Sep 14, 2007 9:17 pm
skavoovie_blind9 wrote:The word 'LEGO', when used as a noun, should only refer to the company that makes the product. Otherwise 'LEGO' is supposed to be used as an adjective. Thus, when referring to the pieces, neither 'lego' nor 'legos' is correct... rather one should say: 'LEGO bricks' or 'LEGO pieces'
I'm not taking the piss but thats about 12 pages ago, well before it got onto waffles (?!) and then google battles.
-
skavoovie_blind9
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 8:08 am
- Location: ManCHESTer
Post
by skavoovie_blind9 » Fri Sep 14, 2007 9:25 pm
LOL
There is like 20 pages in this thread now and I'll be fucked if I'm gonna read through them all.
-
auan
- Posts: 1172
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 1:25 pm
- Location: Glasgow G11
Post
by auan » Fri Sep 14, 2007 9:31 pm
skavoovie_blind9 wrote:The word 'LEGO', when used as a noun, should only refer to the company that makes the product. Otherwise 'LEGO' is supposed to be used as an adjective. Thus, when referring to the pieces, neither 'lego' nor 'legos' is correct... but 'lego' lets you avoid looking like a muppet.
Fixed.
It's called trademark dilution btw. Like how Hoover makes vacuum cleaners, but no one "vacuums" any more, we do the hoovering. No one drinks cola, we drink Coke. So yeah saying 'LEGO bricks' is correct and everything, but really, who's that much of a grammar-fascist?
-
FSTZ
- Posts: 7706
- Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:07 am
- Location: Cookingham
Post
by FSTZ » Fri Sep 14, 2007 9:35 pm
skavoovie_blind9 wrote:If you lost more than one pair of glasses, would you say; "Have you seen my glasseses?"
that is exactly what I would say
-
FSTZ
- Posts: 7706
- Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:07 am
- Location: Cookingham
Post
by FSTZ » Fri Sep 14, 2007 9:36 pm
I woud say it to all them peopleses
-
auan
- Posts: 1172
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 1:25 pm
- Location: Glasgow G11
Post
by auan » Fri Sep 14, 2007 9:41 pm
Do Americans still say 'breastseses'?
-
shonky
- Posts: 9754
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 6:31 pm
Post
by shonky » Fri Sep 14, 2007 9:41 pm
unklefesta wrote:skavoovie_blind9 wrote:If you lost more than one pair of glasses, would you say; "Have you seen my glasseses?"
that is exactly what I would say
You drink a lot though don't you let's face it. It probably stretches to "glasseseseseseses" in those sort of moments.

Hmm....

-
FSTZ
- Posts: 7706
- Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:07 am
- Location: Cookingham
Post
by FSTZ » Fri Sep 14, 2007 9:46 pm
Shonky wrote:unklefesta wrote:skavoovie_blind9 wrote:If you lost more than one pair of glasses, would you say; "Have you seen my glasseses?"
that is exactly what I would say
You drink a lot though don't you let's face it. It probably stretches to "glasseseseseseses" in those sort of moments.

I knew my house was bugged
fak
-
FSTZ
- Posts: 7706
- Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:07 am
- Location: Cookingham
Post
by FSTZ » Fri Sep 14, 2007 9:48 pm
Auan wrote:Do Americans still say 'breastseses'?
tha alkaholiks wrote:"everytime I come home I got 50 messages...
only call back the girls with big big breastesses"
!!
-
showguns
- Posts: 1726
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 4:32 pm
- Location: los angeles, ca
Post
by showguns » Fri Sep 14, 2007 10:02 pm
skavoovie_blind9 wrote:LOL
There is like 20 pages in this thread now and I'll be fucked if I'm gonna read through them all.
then don't bother replying.

"Sometimes I do see people saggin, with dirty underwear, and it is indeed a sad thing."
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests