liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE

debate, appreciation, interviews, reviews (events or releases), videos, radio shows
User avatar
Forum
Posts: 10686
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:55 am
Location: J R Hartley

Re:

Post by Forum » Wed Sep 05, 2012 2:55 pm

slothrop wrote:I'm glad noone came up with a 'subgenre' name to describe the stuff that Caspa and Rusko do, otherwise there might be loads of people making stuff that sounds just like them.

As it is, noone came up with a name for the subgenre so everyone had to come up with their own unique take on the sound and there totally aren't any blatant copycats.

We can learn a lot from this, I think.
:cornlol:
Image Image

Nrjetik
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 7:22 pm

Re:

Post by Nrjetik » Fri Nov 16, 2012 3:30 pm

slothrop wrote:I'm glad noone came up with a 'subgenre' name to describe the stuff that Caspa and Rusko do, otherwise there might be loads of people making stuff that sounds just like them.

As it is, noone came up with a name for the subgenre so everyone had to come up with their own unique take on the sound and there totally aren't any blatant copycats.

We can learn a lot from this, I think.
And sadly 2-3 years later it's now called brostep.

What a weird world we live in.
Soundcloud
Move On (Nrjetik's Progressive Rework) - Shingo Nakamura & Kazusa

Genevieve
Posts: 8775
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:27 pm
Location: 6_6

Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE

Post by Genevieve » Fri Nov 16, 2012 3:58 pm

I'm so glad I missed this.
Image

namsayin

:'0

User avatar
Lye_Form
Posts: 3857
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 3:43 pm
Location: Lundun
Contact:

Re: Re:

Post by Lye_Form » Fri Nov 16, 2012 5:04 pm

Nrjetik wrote:
slothrop wrote:I'm glad noone came up with a 'subgenre' name to describe the stuff that Caspa and Rusko do, otherwise there might be loads of people making stuff that sounds just like them.

As it is, noone came up with a name for the subgenre so everyone had to come up with their own unique take on the sound and there totally aren't any blatant copycats.

We can learn a lot from this, I think.
And sadly 2-3 years later it's now called brostep.

What a weird world we live in.
oh wow.
Life Force Sound | Soundcloud | Facebook
Wolf89 wrote:I'm bit a hipster is the point
wub wrote:Bob Dylan is not Grime.

Genevieve
Posts: 8775
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:27 pm
Location: 6_6

Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE

Post by Genevieve » Fri Nov 16, 2012 5:11 pm

Brostep didn't blow up because of the word. It wasn't brostep to brostep fans, to them it was just dubstep. Brostep blew up because that was the sound that was identified by the masses as dubstep.
Image

namsayin

:'0

User avatar
Lye_Form
Posts: 3857
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 3:43 pm
Location: Lundun
Contact:

Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE

Post by Lye_Form » Fri Nov 16, 2012 5:21 pm

Genevieve wrote:Brostep didn't blow up because of the word. It wasn't brostep to brostep fans, to them it was just dubstep. Brostep blew up because that was the sound that was identified by the masses as dubstep.
it was bound to happen.

D&B focus was all about the drums, so to out do each other on the dancefloor producers/djs make tunes/sets higher bpm for more 'energy'.

Dubstep focus was about the (sub) bass so it went filthier and filthier.
Life Force Sound | Soundcloud | Facebook
Wolf89 wrote:I'm bit a hipster is the point
wub wrote:Bob Dylan is not Grime.

User avatar
Lucifa
Posts: 731
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 9:11 pm

Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE

Post by Lucifa » Fri Nov 16, 2012 7:08 pm

wtf is wrong with all these new school dubsteppers with their hats on backwards and their skateboards

User avatar
fractal
Mako
Posts: 12133
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:58 pm
Location: emerald city, cascadia

Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE

Post by fractal » Fri Nov 16, 2012 7:37 pm

everyone nose the cool kids rock rollerblades

fruitboots 4 lyf!
sub.wise:.
slow down
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum

User avatar
Raad
Posts: 703
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 8:17 pm
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE

Post by Raad » Fri Nov 16, 2012 8:02 pm

Lye Form wrote:
Genevieve wrote:Brostep didn't blow up because of the word. It wasn't brostep to brostep fans, to them it was just dubstep. Brostep blew up because that was the sound that was identified by the masses as dubstep.
it was bound to happen.

D&B focus was all about the drums, so to out do each other on the dancefloor producers/djs make tunes/sets higher bpm for more 'energy'.

Dubstep focus was about the (sub) bass so it went filthier and filthier.
Terrible analysis. You should feel bad because you're talking out of your ass :(

User avatar
Lye_Form
Posts: 3857
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 3:43 pm
Location: Lundun
Contact:

Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE

Post by Lye_Form » Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:38 pm

Raad wrote:
Lye Form wrote:
Genevieve wrote:Brostep didn't blow up because of the word. It wasn't brostep to brostep fans, to them it was just dubstep. Brostep blew up because that was the sound that was identified by the masses as dubstep.
it was bound to happen.

D&B focus was all about the drums, so to out do each other on the dancefloor producers/djs make tunes/sets higher bpm for more 'energy'.

Dubstep focus was about the (sub) bass so it went filthier and filthier.
Terrible analysis. You should feel bad because you're talking out of your ass :(

My point is that the focal aspect of genres gets taken further and further till its fucked.

Uk Garage was the most commercial and got cheesy as fuck

Jungle turned into D&B and D&b turned into a 170 mess

Majority of Dubstep turned into transformer noises

And you can suck a bag of dicks. :W:
Life Force Sound | Soundcloud | Facebook
Wolf89 wrote:I'm bit a hipster is the point
wub wrote:Bob Dylan is not Grime.

User avatar
fractal
Mako
Posts: 12133
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:58 pm
Location: emerald city, cascadia

Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE

Post by fractal » Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:57 pm

yes, but in jungle the focus was the edit in the drums, yet in DnB the drums mostly follow the exact same pattern ad infinity
sub.wise:.
slow down
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum

User avatar
_cheef_
Posts: 1477
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 4:25 pm
Location: FARGO!

Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE

Post by _cheef_ » Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:16 pm

I miss the days when 180 bpm clownstep was big in the edm game :|

User avatar
Lye_Form
Posts: 3857
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 3:43 pm
Location: Lundun
Contact:

Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE

Post by Lye_Form » Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:17 pm

_cheef_ wrote:I miss the days when 180 bpm clownstep was big in the edm game :|
Those tru vibes couldn't last long tho brudda.
Life Force Sound | Soundcloud | Facebook
Wolf89 wrote:I'm bit a hipster is the point
wub wrote:Bob Dylan is not Grime.

test_recordings
Posts: 5079
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:36 pm
Location: LEEDS

Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE

Post by test_recordings » Sat Nov 17, 2012 1:08 am

fractal wrote:yes, but in jungle the focus was the edit in the drums, yet in DnB the drums mostly follow the exact same pattern ad infinity
I hate generic DnB for that reason, producers focus on everything BUT the drums :u: Ruins my night having to listen to the same shit over and over again! Waste of money..
Getzatrhythm

User avatar
Raad
Posts: 703
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 8:17 pm
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE

Post by Raad » Sat Nov 17, 2012 9:16 am

Lye Form wrote:
Raad wrote:
Lye Form wrote:
Genevieve wrote:Brostep didn't blow up because of the word. It wasn't brostep to brostep fans, to them it was just dubstep. Brostep blew up because that was the sound that was identified by the masses as dubstep.
it was bound to happen.

D&B focus was all about the drums, so to out do each other on the dancefloor producers/djs make tunes/sets higher bpm for more 'energy'.

Dubstep focus was about the (sub) bass so it went filthier and filthier.
Terrible analysis. You should feel bad because you're talking out of your ass :(
Jungle turned into D&B and D&b turned into a 170 mess

And you can suck a bag of dicks. :W:
Still wrong and no.

Also I don't agree with your general point. The problem is not that a genre gets pushed "too far" within its philosophy/aesthetics (also, I'm pretty sure "filthy bass" wasn't the objective when dubstep started). The problems begin when artists that have no roots within the scene copy some really shallow aspects of the music and produce easy to digest shit and gain success. This is when producers and fans lose focus of what it was all about from the beginning.

But this is mainly a problem within genres that generally don't get mainstream attention I guess. (There's no point in doing an easy to digest version of something that is already popular.)

Genevieve
Posts: 8775
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:27 pm
Location: 6_6

Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE

Post by Genevieve » Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:50 am

The problem isn't the music, but the people that listen to it. By and large, most music is shit and most people listen to shit music.

There's this unwritten law of music that if a new genre comes out, the shittiest version of it will be picked up by the masses.
Image

namsayin

:'0

User avatar
mIrReN
Posts: 5611
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:22 pm
Location: Belgium, Bruges

Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE

Post by mIrReN » Sat Nov 17, 2012 1:15 pm

I like titties!
in all colours and shapes :)
"If your chest ain't rattlin it ain't happenin'" - DJ Pinch
"Move pples bodies and stimulate their minds"
we just ride the wave
Life sucks; Get used² it.

big up your mum

User avatar
Lye_Form
Posts: 3857
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 3:43 pm
Location: Lundun
Contact:

Re: liquid dubstep....THE FUTURE

Post by Lye_Form » Sat Nov 17, 2012 3:37 pm

mIrReN wrote:I like titties!
in all colours and shapes :)
+1
Life Force Sound | Soundcloud | Facebook
Wolf89 wrote:I'm bit a hipster is the point
wub wrote:Bob Dylan is not Grime.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests