This isn't a "real" fight...cmgoodman1226 wrote:I just came here to see a fight...

This isn't a "real" fight...cmgoodman1226 wrote:I just came here to see a fight...
But what if the cat is wearing boxing gloves and a gum shield?Viineri wrote:This isn't a "real" fight...cmgoodman1226 wrote:I just came here to see a fight...
BLAHBLAHJAH wrote:... If you're ever in a burning building and you see smoke and smell fire, maybe it's worth getting
out...
Then it's a car without an engine.cityzen wrote:But what if the cat is wearing boxing gloves and a gum shield?Viineri wrote:This isn't a "real" fight...cmgoodman1226 wrote:I just came here to see a fight...
I know. That's why I'm so disappointed.Viineri wrote:This isn't a "real" fight...cmgoodman1226 wrote:I just came here to see a fight...
multiple actual laugh out loud moments there. good god....jameshk wrote:
cloaked_up wrote:looks like he is wearing a green neon EDM mini bar fridge lamp shoe
cmgoodman1226 wrote:I just came here to see a fight...
True, I forgot that it is a noble argument to want to make sure that "dubstep remains dubstep" (i dont exactly know what that entails) because this is, after all, the dubstepforum(.com). However, the actual distinction between "evolution" and "bastardization" is relatively in the eye of the beholder. I define "good" music as music that goes on to influence the creation of other music (music that inspires other people to become musicians, djs, producers, etc.).epochalypso wrote:Some people just seem to get "evolution" and "bastardisation" confused. As well as "progression" and "stagnation".
HOL (Haha'd out loud)epochalypso wrote:btw this whole rant is kinda OT, needless to say the video is shit, the argument is flawed and don't even get me started on the delicate petal of a man presenting it.
cyrusfx wrote:True, I forgot that it is a noble argument to want to make sure that "dubstep remains dubstep" (i dont exactly know what that entails) because this is, after all, the dubstepforum(.com). However, the actual distinction between "evolution" and "bastardization" is relatively in the eye of the beholder. I define "good" music as music that goes on to influence the creation of other music (music that inspires other people to become musicians, djs, producers, etc.).epochalypso wrote:Some people just seem to get "evolution" and "bastardisation" confused. As well as "progression" and "stagnation".
In that sense, I readily admit Skrillex is "good" because he's already had a major impact on the type of music that new electronic music producers want to create. Whether or not you like what they are making is an opinion, and the world will continue to churn according to the laws of supply and demand regardless of what any one individual thinks about it.
Besides, I don't really think its possible to intervene with "evolution" to make sure it heads in the direction you want it to. Evolution is defined as an adaptive response to change in environment, and cannot be decidedly programmed in a studio, or a laboratory, because we simply can't predict how the environment is going to change.
HOL (Haha'd out loud)epochalypso wrote:btw this whole rant is kinda OT, needless to say the video is shit, the argument is flawed and don't even get me started on the delicate petal of a man presenting it.
So if someone makes a simple beat to the sound of a toilet flushing and that inspires somebody its good music to you?cyrusfx wrote:True, I forgot that it is a noble argument to want to make sure that "dubstep remains dubstep" (i dont exactly know what that entails) because this is, after all, the dubstepforum(.com). However, the actual distinction between "evolution" and "bastardization" is relatively in the eye of the beholder. I define "good" music as music that goes on to influence the creation of other music (music that inspires other people to become musicians, djs, producers, etc.).
In that sense, I readily admit Skrillex is "good" because he's already had a major impact on the type of music that new electronic music producers want to create.
Nah, its SHITTY!spire wrote:So if someone makes a simple beat to the sound of a toilet flushing and that inspires somebody its good music to you?cyrusfx wrote:True, I forgot that it is a noble argument to want to make sure that "dubstep remains dubstep" (i dont exactly know what that entails) because this is, after all, the dubstepforum(.com). However, the actual distinction between "evolution" and "bastardization" is relatively in the eye of the beholder. I define "good" music as music that goes on to influence the creation of other music (music that inspires other people to become musicians, djs, producers, etc.).
In that sense, I readily admit Skrillex is "good" because he's already had a major impact on the type of music that new electronic music producers want to create.
butter_man wrote: who do you think taught you smoke tree's, OD'S, Ice cubes and DOC's?
God, thats who.
jrkhnds wrote:- dubstepforum, 2014.and I've never really rated dubstep..
wub wrote:Which you've mistreated.samdam1 wrote:Well, then, it's still a fookin' cat regardless isn't it.wub wrote:Yes, but it's a cat that is being abused and mistreated by it's owner.samdam1 wrote:Like, if I put a hat on a cat, and shave its tail, and put some little boots on it, its still a fuckin' cat right? LOL
Again, another poor analogy.
The argument isn't the actuality of the thing, it's what is done to the thing that may be interpreted as abuse.
Pistonsbeneath wrote:yeah he did this..
i wonder if hes ever met anyone with a regional accent![]()
how embarrassing
kingldub wrote:Pistonsbeneath wrote:yeah he did this..
i wonder if hes ever met anyone with a regional accent![]()
how embarrassingOh my. This is hilarious.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests