christDevry[Kaneda] wrote:Let me specify:
Don't get me wrong, love da p00n as much as the next soulja

and you're a liar unless you've finally banged that bird nosed broad
christDevry[Kaneda] wrote:Let me specify:
Don't get me wrong, love da p00n as much as the next soulja
haha this is bound to start a shitstormidontreallygiveashit wrote:Coki invented Brostep.
you don't think these problems would exist after those "4 short years"? - sexual assault and harassment, and sexism in general, persists well beyond the academy stageDevry[Kaneda] wrote:Let me specify: I don't think that they should be allowed to attend the SAME institution that men do, but they should still be allowed to serve.
Don't get me wrong, love da p00n as much as the next soulja, but just the standard gender interaction doesn't fit that environment. There's a certain monastic element to military academies, one that allows for what I consider a higher level of concentration on studies and professional development(an important concept considering the fact that we're training to lead people)
Granted, thanks to the ubiquity of the Internet and information technology in general, that monastic element that used to typify the academy experience has been permanently altered, but by eliminating a very blatant distraction, you can retain a sense of isolation.
Don't get me wrong, I treasure every opportunity I get to leave that place and act like a normal person(normal relationships included), but but I'd prefer if that gender interplay didn't exist within my "monastery"
Furthermore, the inclusion of females into academies about 30 years ago has created some seriously harmful stereotypes that I think have permanently affected the perception of female officers within the operational services. They're either the "butch, douchey, softball gurls" who are treated with immense disdain or the "academy sluts", who are treated with even greater disdain. These roles find ways to manifest themselves in the careers of female officers, often serving as rationalizations for failures of successes in terms of promotion.
I absolutely believe that females are capable of military service, but I think it would be for the best if for the duration of 4 short years, both genders separate themselves within their respective learning institutions.
I want to write more, but my thumbs are sore, so I'll wait for responses, if this post gets any
AxeD wrote:post your awful taste in music you assholes
wobbles wrote::3
im also guessing boys outnumber girls in the academycomputerface wrote:Gotta admit I'm impressed, Devry. Was expecting the worst after seeing that original post, but that's actually a really well thought-out argument.
Do you really think, though, that gender segregation is the answer? It seems to me that the real problem with what you're describing is the extremely sexist prejudices of the males attending military academies, not any truly systemic issue. What you're saying is an argument that's been used by a lot of people as a weak attempt to mask their prejudices or to excuse those of others - "whites and african-americans shouldn't mix, racism and racial violence only exist because of integration" - rather than actually try to fix that bigotry.
Sure, segregation might fix the short-term problem, but that's completely ignoring the actual root of the issue.
AxeD wrote:post your awful taste in music you assholes
wobbles wrote::3
P Daley wrote:Ended up at a party last night with a bunch of people I don't know and blacked out,
Woke up this morning with an email about ordering a $70 pair of UFO pants.
Do you not remember the penis debacle?JTMMusicuk wrote:Wow this thread has became pretty intense... sexism is bad kids
It rings a bell (lol) but i might be thinking of another time, what happened there like?idontreallygiveashit wrote:Do you not remember the penis debacle?JTMMusicuk wrote:Wow this thread has became pretty intense... sexism is bad kids
Somebody said vaginas were ugly, someone else (possibly dubfordessert) said penises are ugly and laughable - cue multiple pages of pure venom, penis defense and how it's okay to rape women if they laugh at your penis (or something like that). It was great, wholesome fun.JTMMusicuk wrote:It rings a bell (lol) but i might be thinking of another time, what happened there like?idontreallygiveashit wrote:Do you not remember the penis debacle?JTMMusicuk wrote:Wow this thread has became pretty intense... sexism is bad kids
Im gunna guess....sonika?idontreallygiveashit wrote: Somebody said vaginas were ugly,
my problem is that in a case of clear cut sexism against women, perpetrated by men, in a context where the VAST majority of people involved are men and they occupy almost all the positions of power in an institution that is male-orientated, it takes a handful of posts for someone to somehow pin some of it on the women.noam wrote:thats why i said 'the problem is also...' and not 'women are mainly, nay, solely responsible for the problem because of...'
but the problem of 'who started it...' is redundant anyway. i mean if you just want to point fingers then yeah i spose i can see a point kind of, but mainly, dealing with the issue at hand which is how do we make people treat each other with more respect, is more important.
\can-o-wormz
AxeD wrote:post your awful taste in music you assholes
wobbles wrote::3
idontreallygiveashit wrote:Somebody said vaginas were ugly, someone else (possibly dubfordessert) said penises are ugly and laughable - cue multiple pages of pure venom, penis defense and how it's okay to rape women if they laugh at your penis (or something like that). It was great, wholesome fun.JTMMusicuk wrote:It rings a bell (lol) but i might be thinking of another time, what happened there like?idontreallygiveashit wrote:Do you not remember the penis debacle?JTMMusicuk wrote:Wow this thread has became pretty intense... sexism is bad kids
JTMMusicuk wrote:Im gunna guess....sonika?idontreallygiveashit wrote: Somebody said vaginas were ugly,
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests