3333333, 4.1 crack was still fuckednowaysj wrote:4.1
serious question: Which DAW to use?
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
jackmaster wrote:you went in with this mix.
Soundcloud.onelove. wrote:There needs to be a DZA app on iPhone just for id'ing old Grime tracks.
http://soundcloud.com/keepitgully http://www.mixcloud.com/slevarance/
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
Thou speaketh for thyself.
-
xthewiddler
- Posts: 1195
- Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 4:36 am
- Location: Jersey
- Contact:
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
kinda, im using LOLdacity (audacity) to do it, the downside of which, i can only get 4 sec previews.. and i cant change parameters while listening, so its tediouslowpass wrote:
Ozone 4?![]()
Does that mean you are using a seperate daw for this? or is there a standalone for it?
Cheers for upping that pic again nitz
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
Haha audacity and 4 secs trial hahaxthewiddler wrote:kinda, im using LOLdacity (audacity) to do it, the downside of which, i can only get 4 sec previews.. and i cant change parameters while listening, so its tediouslowpass wrote:
Ozone 4?![]()
Does that mean you are using a seperate daw for this? or is there a standalone for it?
Cheers for upping that pic again nitz
use reaper my friend its free
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
REAPER IS NOT FREEnitz wrote:Haha audacity and 4 secs trial hahaxthewiddler wrote:kinda, im using LOLdacity (audacity) to do it, the downside of which, i can only get 4 sec previews.. and i cant change parameters while listening, so its tediouslowpass wrote:
Ozone 4?![]()
Does that mean you are using a seperate daw for this? or is there a standalone for it?
Cheers for upping that pic again nitz![]()
use reaper my friend its free
just heckling
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
reaper might get some more features and more development if people started paying for a license instead of taking advantage of the fully functional demo...
then again what do i know
then again what do i know
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
my thoughts exactly.deadly habit wrote:reaper might get some more features and more development if people started paying for a license instead of taking advantage of the fully functional demo...
then again what do i know
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
Well want did you expect ! if your giving out 95% of the software FREE>?86. wrote:my thoughts exactly.deadly habit wrote:reaper might get some more features and more development if people started paying for a license instead of taking advantage of the fully functional demo...
then again what do i know
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
renoise does the same, minus save feature, yet people buy the license for that and the developers are very open to the userbase for features in versions they work onnitz wrote:Well want did you expect ! if your giving out 95% of the software FREE>?86. wrote:my thoughts exactly.deadly habit wrote:reaper might get some more features and more development if people started paying for a license instead of taking advantage of the fully functional demo...
then again what do i know
food for thought
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
nitz wrote:Well want did you expect ! if your giving out 95% of the software FREE>?86. wrote:my thoughts exactly.deadly habit wrote:reaper might get some more features and more development if people started paying for a license instead of taking advantage of the fully functional demo...
then again what do i know
oh I can see why people won't cop a license....but still.
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
exactly those unlicensed have no right to bitch about features, bugs etc. same goes for any soft86. wrote:nitz wrote:Well want did you expect ! if your giving out 95% of the software FREE>?86. wrote:my thoughts exactly.deadly habit wrote:reaper might get some more features and more development if people started paying for a license instead of taking advantage of the fully functional demo...
then again what do i know
oh I can see why people won't cop a license....but still.
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
This is why you got a well known DAW and pay for it, because if anything does go wrong they will sort it out for you!
Noting wrong it trying other small company's out but only if it was something i need badly or something really nuts i wll mostly not buy it! but hey this is the whole point of business you need to have something extra !
Noting wrong it trying other small company's out but only if it was something i need badly or something really nuts i wll mostly not buy it! but hey this is the whole point of business you need to have something extra !
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
the big companies started somewhere, and back then you had no option but to pay.
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
I considered Reaper cuz I was looking for something that I can run off a USB.
it doesn't suit my workflow...but it's a good program. it's clearly worth waaaaaaaaaaay more than $60 imo. obviously overtime it'll increase in price.
it doesn't suit my workflow...but it's a good program. it's clearly worth waaaaaaaaaaay more than $60 imo. obviously overtime it'll increase in price.
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
yea that's what irks me so much the license is so cheap. hell cheaper than renoise, energyxt or flstudio. skip eating out and that bag of weed for a couple weeks and support what you use so much. fuck i'm on the ramen diet now because my love of production means that much for new gear even at discount.
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
you use Reaper?
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
i've messed around in it, i have in most daws just my strong suits are fl pre 7, cubase, and renoise. i like to experiment around so if i collab in person i'm not completely out of the water and i can give balanced advice at work when people ask. if you want a free (actually) quality studio app http://www.buzzmachines.com/86. wrote:you use Reaper?
and yea ask the boys of arsenic bout it or more known dubstep way symbl bout that
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
I've seen A LOT of extremely disgruntled steiny people. Was just reading a thread about their bit bridge, fucking hilarious. Steiny said they can't guarantee that all third party vst's will work with their bridge, then someone hoisted them in saying that their own 32 bit vst's don't work with their bridge. Steiny's response - go buy jbridge! HA HA HA! I've never seen such a big fuck u from a corp developer. HA HA HA.nitz wrote:This is why you got a well known DAW and pay for it, because if anything does go wrong they will sort it out for you!
From what I can tell, reapers squad is WAY more responsive to user requests.
I've seen the same level of dissatisfaction from logic and sonar heads as well, so I don't know what the solution is really. Just keep doing what ur doing?
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
much as i love steinburg for cubase and whole vst platform they are always last to adapt and worst custy supportnowaysj wrote:I've seen A LOT of extremely disgruntled steiny people. Was just reading a thread about their bit bridge, fucking hilarious. Steiny said they can't guarantee that all third party vst's will work with their bridge, then someone hoisted them in saying that their own 32 bit vst's don't work with their bridge. Steiny's response - go buy jbridge! HA HA HA! I've never seen such a big fuck u from a corp developer. HA HA HA.nitz wrote:This is why you got a well known DAW and pay for it, because if anything does go wrong they will sort it out for you!
From what I can tell, reapers squad is WAY more responsive to user requests.
I've seen the same level of dissatisfaction from logic and sonar heads as well, so I don't know what the solution is really. Just keep doing what ur doing?
- hurlingdervish
- Posts: 2971
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:37 pm
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
im going to be an asshole and say its cause they are germandeadly habit wrote:much as i love steinburg for cubase and whole vst platform they are always last to adapt and worst custy supportnowaysj wrote:I've seen A LOT of extremely disgruntled steiny people. Was just reading a thread about their bit bridge, fucking hilarious. Steiny said they can't guarantee that all third party vst's will work with their bridge, then someone hoisted them in saying that their own 32 bit vst's don't work with their bridge. Steiny's response - go buy jbridge! HA HA HA! I've never seen such a big fuck u from a corp developer. HA HA HA.nitz wrote:This is why you got a well known DAW and pay for it, because if anything does go wrong they will sort it out for you!
From what I can tell, reapers squad is WAY more responsive to user requests.
I've seen the same level of dissatisfaction from logic and sonar heads as well, so I don't know what the solution is really. Just keep doing what ur doing?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
