Visualizing Ten Dimensions (String Theory)

[alien pimp]

in case anyone holds the answer, please share, i'm stuck here!

and most important of all - where and how is it stored that time of yours you consider a dimension, i mean the past, the future... where do they exist now and in what form?

[bandshell]

in case anyone holds the answer, please share, i'm stuck here!

and most important of all - where and how is it stored that time of yours you consider a dimension, i mean the past, the future... where do they exist now and in what form?

I think we move, not time. Time stays the same, everything else changes. It's just a man made way of tracking movement and change.

[parson]

STEALING MY STYLE EVEN WEARIN MY CLOTHES

[parson]

[alien pimp]

in case anyone holds the answer, please share, i'm stuck here!

and most important of all - where and how is it stored that time of yours you consider a dimension, i mean the past, the future... where do they exist now and in what form?

I think we move not time. Time stays the same, everything else changes. It's just a man made way of tracking movement and change.

we have a winner!

[alien pimp]

STEALING MY STYLE EVEN WEARIN MY CLOTHES

and a wiener

find 3,14 differences

[alien pimp]

to shorten the charade, cuz i need a movie now:

in a sane world, the past is by definition something that doesn't exist anymore, future is something that doesn't exist yet, and we hardly have existing this theoretical point called present.
uniting the present with a point that doesn't exist in order to create the illusion of more than a point - beats my understanding how that works

but i'm sure parson will have the curiosity to peep my post and the ability to answer the dilemma before magma comes in

[parson]

watch the video this thread is about

[alien pimp]

watch the video this thread is about

this is how you admit you have no answer you can briefly formulate here?

[parson]

this is how i try to get you up to speed so you can participate without being an uninformed child.

[alien pimp]

this is how i try to get you up to speed so you can participate without being an uninformed child.

this russel howard show i was watching is pretty boring, but not as much as your naive attempts to hide the obvious: you have no capacity to support your ideas and you don't understand much of the videos you watch

[alien pimp]

ooohhh, the laughs i had from the man that stares at screens

i have repeated numerous times that the worlds most eminent astronomer, Sir Martin Rees, has gone on BBC and quietly proven the existence of a creator.

yeh, he puts it like this:

"I would say I don't believe any religious dogma in that if science teaches me anything, it teaches me that even simple things, like a hydrogen atom, are pretty hard to understand. And therefore I become rather sceptical of anyone who claims to have more than a very incomplete, metaphorical understanding of any deep aspects of reality. So I'm sceptical of anyone who claims confidently to believe any dogma. But nonetheless I share with religious people a concept of the mystery and wonder of the universe, and even more of human life and therefore participate in religious services. And of course those I participate in are as it were, the 'customs of my tribe', which happens to be the Church of England."

which would put him right in the lines of "WHO THE FUCK KNOWS WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON!?"

good to see we are all on the same page

and as "what" includes god, that proves no one can write a book and start a religion based on the fact that god thinks one way or another and he wants you to do something which means the bible and its god are a lie, which means reese proved parson a fool, not the existence of god 1 second

[parson]

what the fuck are y'all even talking about? nothing in that quote is about the cosmological constant. martin rees' claim that the cosmological constant is evidence of a creator has got nothing to do with dogma.

[parson]

srsly y'all are retarded and i'm a fucking genius for having you blocked

[alien pimp]

what the fuck are y'all even talking about? nothing in that quote is about the cosmological constant. martin rees' claim that the cosmological constant is evidence of a creator has got nothing to do with dogma.

what a load of wank
and you can't block me because you know i'll own you from behind if you turn your back on me

[parson]

you've got no idea what you're talking about and you cry from the sidelines because you refuse to learn how to play the game.

[alien pimp]

you've got no idea what you're talking about and you cry from the sidelines because you refuse to learn how to play the game.

that's why i'm asking for help and all you can do is sit in your boat and shout "you're drowning!"

so can you answer my question or you just like to keep bitching after "blocking" me for being chatty?

[parson]

watch the fucking video or get the fuck out of the fucking thread about the video

[lloydnoise]

This went well

in case anyone holds the answer, please share, i'm stuck here!

and most important of all - where and how is it stored that time of yours you consider a dimension, i mean the past, the future... where do they exist now and in what form?

There is no 'where' in regards to time, that's why it's not a spatial dimension.

Also, time is a proven concept, both theories of relativity deal with spacetime and those theories are pretty sound.
If you travel incredibly fast, time slows down in relation. If you go the speed of light, time stops. You have swapped all your time for space, you are travelling through space at the maximum speed (light) therefore you must travel through time with the minimum speed (no time).

Not believing in time makes you sound like a mentalcase

[rbnc]

I like watching people talk about string theory, especially those who can't even spell and punctuate.