Tbh people have been three notches past paranoid about naming subgenres of dubstep since the word go because "if you call this sound 'liquid dubstep' and that sound 'jumpup dubstep' then all the sounds will go off into their own little pigeonholes and not interact, like with dnb" and so on.
But it's seems pretty obvious to anyone without a big dollop of wishful thinking that despite the lack of subgenre names dubstep is still seperating into different sounds and different scenes and getting just as fragmented as DnB.
So I don't really get why people still trot out the same line...
hatcha wrote:ITS ALL DUBSTEP SO JUS LEAVE IT AT THAT
fuck all this sub genres and segregation. there are different styles but its all one sound, one music. thats one of the best things about dubstep compared with other genres.
Btw, I'm not suggesting that we should prepare our submissions to the United Nations Commitee for Classification of Dance Music Subgenres and explaining why liquid techy funkstep is different from hard techy funkstep, just that the idea that people using words to describe particular sounds is responsible for the existence of those sounds seems to have pretty solid evidence against it now...
Yes there is ambient dub & filthy dub + all that inbetween but Dubstep needs to be under one genre untill we've taken over completely.
I say 'taking over'... that's where some are taking it. Personally I believe Dub should stay underground... I hate all these posh R&B kids listening to Dubstep and thinking they're cool.
slothrop wrote:But it's seems pretty obvious to anyone without a big dollop of wishful thinking that despite the lack of subgenre names dubstep is still seperating into different sounds and different scenes and getting just as fragmented as DnB.
exactly, dividing things into subgenres will generally lead to segregation between styles, which is generally a bad thing. the cool thing about dubstep is you can listen to 3 dubstep tunes and hear 3 completely different things.
they have tended to be the only 'rules' for the sound so far but even those two specifications aren't always guaranteed nowadays...haha...
i love the fact that the boundary lines for genres have become gloriously blurred over the last couple years...the whole UK Funky movement, the shit Brackles and Shortstuff etc etc are pushing, the Club Autonomic stuff, grime, dubstep...it's all just one big thing really anyway...
Corpsey wrote:Maybe if I murder my parents, Martyn will adopt me.
djake wrote:Youngsta is a machine sent back in time to mix like a badman...
FackOff wrote:the beauty lies in the mystery - finding for yourself is part of the fun of dubstep music,or just music for that matter.i can see where you're coming from but i just think that to maintain the mystery,something which is always appealing to anybody,the vagueness and diversity has to be left at 'dubstep' and too over-classify something just removes the mystique about it and makes it more mechanical and therefore less soulful if you get me..
THIS POST THIS POST THIS POST THIS POST
how do you not get it yet man...? we were all newcomers at some point, DIG IN.
hey, you wouldn't hire a clown to fix a leak in the john..so why do you let these hooligans tear down the biz?