Landmark court case/hackman was right!

Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.

Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
User avatar
magma
Posts: 18810
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Landmark court case/hackman was right!

Post by magma » Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:16 pm

DRTY wrote:it's called cherry popping.
Nah, that's what I did with your sister.
Meus equus tuo altior est

"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.


slothrop
Posts: 2655
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:59 am

Re: Landmark court case/hackman was right!

Post by slothrop » Wed Sep 15, 2010 5:01 pm

http://www.badscience.net/

Generally essential if you want someone who looks critically at the actual evidence whether it comes from AstraZeneca or a quack dietician...

metalboxproducts
Posts: 7132
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Lower Clapton Rd, Hackney
Contact:

Re: Landmark court case/hackman was right!

Post by metalboxproducts » Wed Sep 15, 2010 5:32 pm

slothrop wrote:http://www.badscience.net/

Generally essential if you want someone who looks critically at the actual evidence whether it comes from AstraZeneca or a quack dietician...
Yes. A very good book!
magma wrote: I must fellate you instantly."?
Close The Door available here vvvvvvvv
http://www.digital-tunes.net/labels/metalbox
http://www.myspace.com/metalboxproducts
every thursday 10-12 gmt
Image

Genevieve
Posts: 8775
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:27 pm
Location: 6_6

Re: Landmark court case/hackman was right!

Post by Genevieve » Wed Sep 15, 2010 6:15 pm

hackman wrote:what do you think i'm arguing? the only point that is important here is that a court paid out 1.5 million in compensation to a child who developed autism after an mmr vaccine
AND DR ANDREW WAKEFIELD WAS STRUCK OFF MEDICAL REGISTER AND HUMILIATED FOR POINTING THAT OUT
The second link you gave argued that she didn't develop autism, but that an undiagnosed cellular disorder she had reacted poorly to the vaccinations which damaged her brain, that features symptoms similar to those find in children with autistic spectrum disorder.

Social anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, major unipolar depression, Tourette's, obsessive compulsive disorder, borderline personality disorder and HSP can all be strikingly similar to PDD-NOS or Asperger can all look like an autism spectrum disorder without actually being one. Humans are complicated.

Furthermore, there is a genetic link between schizophrenia and autism and I think that autism and predisposition to schizophrenia develop in the fourth month of pregnancy.
Image

namsayin

:'0

User avatar
magma
Posts: 18810
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Landmark court case/hackman was right!

Post by magma » Wed Sep 15, 2010 6:29 pm

Genevieve wrote:Furthermore, there is a genetic link between schizophrenia and autism and I think that autism and predisposition to schizophrenia develop in the fourth month of pregnancy.
And autisim only starts showing signs when you learn to communicate at around one year... coincidentally the same time you have MMR. Just because they happen at the same time doesn't make them linked, otherwise my farts would be responsible for a fuck load of deaths.
Meus equus tuo altior est

"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.


hackman
Posts: 7405
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:53 am
Location: west
Contact:

Re: Landmark court case/hackman was right!

Post by hackman » Mon Sep 20, 2010 9:40 am

:|
cos vaccines are the only way to treat anything
Some doctors relate this recent rise in cases to the parents who have shied away from vaccinating children due to fears, albeit unfounded, that there is a connection between vaccines and autism.
i love this bit....
i mean, really??? :lol:
finji wrote:Hey hackman your a fucking nutter
Soundcloud

noam
Posts: 10825
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:10 pm
Location: Manchester/Leeds

Re: Landmark court case/hackman was right!

Post by noam » Mon Sep 20, 2010 1:26 pm

from the second article posted on page one

"The same kind of logic comes in play here: child has a mitochondrial disorder, she has some sort of reaction after a batch of vaccines and over a few months develops autistic symptoms. Can we say that vaccines cause autism? No, at most we can say that, possibly for children which have this cellular disorder, the combination of the vaccines and the disorder, and some other factor, may result in autistic-like symptoms. Even this though, is simply a hypothesis, when all we have is a single data point."

why have they paid 1.5million dollars? fuck know's... courts make bad calls all the time

User avatar
hurlingdervish
Posts: 2971
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:37 pm

Re: Landmark court case/hackman was right!

Post by hurlingdervish » Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:53 pm

you can't get vaccinated against gullibility

Genevieve
Posts: 8775
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:27 pm
Location: 6_6

Re: Landmark court case/hackman was right!

Post by Genevieve » Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:56 pm

hackman wrote::|
cos vaccines are the only way to treat anything
The 'it sucks, but it's the best we've got' thing people usually apply to democracy can be applied very well to vaccination.

Possibly awful side effects and it can be really hard on the body, but in a lot of (not all) cases, it's better than nothing.
Image

namsayin

:'0

hackman
Posts: 7405
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:53 am
Location: west
Contact:

Re: Landmark court case/hackman was right!

Post by hackman » Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:57 pm

hurlingdervish wrote:you can't get vaccinated against gullibility
can't tell if this is at my expense or not :)
finji wrote:Hey hackman your a fucking nutter
Soundcloud

hackman
Posts: 7405
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:53 am
Location: west
Contact:

Re: Landmark court case/hackman was right!

Post by hackman » Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:57 pm

Genevieve wrote:
hackman wrote::|
cos vaccines are the only way to treat anything
The 'it sucks, but it's the best we've got' thing people usually apply to democracy can be applied very well to vaccination.

Possibly awful side effects and it can be really hard on the body, but in a lot of (not all) cases, it's better than nothing.
i'm not advocating nothing, there's scores of other treatments :roll:
finji wrote:Hey hackman your a fucking nutter
Soundcloud

User avatar
hurlingdervish
Posts: 2971
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:37 pm

Re: Landmark court case/hackman was right!

Post by hurlingdervish » Mon Sep 20, 2010 5:36 pm

hackman wrote:
hurlingdervish wrote:you can't get vaccinated against gullibility
can't tell if this is at my expense or not :)
mission: succesful :lol:
i'm pretty ambivalent about my paranoia. i try to beat it down with a logic stick but still give it enough room to breathe.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests