It's a normal function of the human brain to categorize and organize and group things together. It's how we identify ourselves with whatever it is that we like, and if you can use a single term to do it, then it's much easier to communicate it. It's also necessary for writers, event promoters.etc. to know what it is they're promoting (other than the artist name). If you've never heard of an artist before, it might be worthwhile knowing exactly what it is they produce - easier to research to see if you want to see them then (I've done this a few times myself).deadly habit wrote:the difference is when you have someone who is supposed to be a staple player of what they're citing saying to not categorize it maybe you should listenamphibian wrote:Skream, 2003: "To all the journalists - there's no such thing as Dubstep guys, we're just having fun making music!"deadly habit wrote:http://twitter.com/flyinglotus/status/23271182275
i don't get why you guys feel the need to sub categorize everything anyways it's easy to pick with your ears what sounds similar and not everyone is going to agree on well it's this subgenre no it's this one
that and people are coming up with the most retarded names and sub sub genres for shit that's been around for ages
ex: drumstep
Regardless of whether names for subgenres (or genres, for that matter) suck, is irrelevant. If the name sticks, then so be it. I don't get why so many people find it a problem. Genres and subgenres and their names usually have nothing to do with producers, and all about punters, journalists and events (marketing).
As for drumstep - fair call, I think it sucks - but it seems to be catching on quicker than "half time dnb", which really isn't a very catchy term (from a marketing perspective).
i actually find the whole argument against subgenres rather unprogressive. If it wasn't for dnb, 2-step, garage.etc. - you probably wouldn't have the spin-off dubstep genre (which is becoming an epic super-genre). Let's not forget that all those genres were also spin-offs from breaks, house.etc, which are sub-genres of electronic dance music (or edm if you're a marketer/journalist in the early 90s).
Subgenres do become irrelevant at a certain point (4-5 levels down) - but I do believe Dubstep has a lot of them, and for good reason - they all have VERY different sounds. Their names will probably be coined by Journalists (Brostep), and fought by the jaded few who think it's a futile exercise. But really, the argument is a waste of time and energy and no matter what we think, people will find ways to identify with the music they love, and that in itself is an empowering notion.