The line between raw and badly produced

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
escapes
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 2:59 am

Re: The line between raw and badly produced

Post by escapes » Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:25 pm

This why the old boom bap 90s hip hop sounds so good ! All analog hardware and vinyl ! Keep it raw, nun of that sampling mp3s !
Kryptic Minds seem to get it just right they that got that dirty organic yet clean sound.

User avatar
Ldizzy
Posts: 1651
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:47 am

Re: The line between raw and badly produced

Post by Ldizzy » Fri Jan 06, 2012 4:47 am

no dude... some 90s hip hop sounded like shit...

the one u hear was either mixed in million dollar studios or crafted by VERY crafty people... and the beatmakers we all praise were tight on so many levels...

just type mpc 60 old school rap beat on utube and tell me that shit is dope...
Sharmaji wrote:2011: the year of the calloused-from-overuse facepalm

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: The line between raw and badly produced

Post by wub » Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:47 am

escapes wrote:This why the old boom bap 90s hip hop sounds so good ! All analog hardware and vinyl ! Keep it raw, nun of that sampling mp3s !
Kryptic Minds seem to get it just right they that got that dirty organic yet clean sound.
KM said in an interview that a lot of their drum sounds were recorded on a mobile phone, sounds of them hitting decaying tree logs with a stick to get a natural lo-fi snare sound.
Ldizzy wrote:no dude... some 90s hip hop sounded like shit...

the one u hear was either mixed in million dollar studios or crafted by VERY crafty people... and the beatmakers we all praise were tight on so many levels...

just type mpc 60 old school rap beat on utube and tell me that shit is dope...
Spot on, which brings us back to the formula;

shit production + amazing tune = raw
shit production + shit tune = shit

User avatar
Ldizzy
Posts: 1651
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:47 am

Re: The line between raw and badly produced

Post by Ldizzy » Fri Jan 06, 2012 7:15 pm

haha totally agree!!!

whats the result for

amazing production + shit tune? most radio pop releases??
Sharmaji wrote:2011: the year of the calloused-from-overuse facepalm

joegrizzly
Posts: 273
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 7:22 pm

Re: The line between raw and badly produced

Post by joegrizzly » Fri Jan 06, 2012 7:57 pm

PERCEPT wrote:Lets be honest if Coki or Jakes were unknown and came in here later on today, we'd probably all be saying sweet tracks but you need to work on your mixdown a lot. But they're both two of my favourite artists, go figure.
I know this was written months ago, but really??? If some unknowns presented the same tunes i'd say good fucking job.. lol

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: The line between raw and badly produced

Post by wub » Fri Jan 06, 2012 9:27 pm

Ldizzy wrote:haha totally agree!!!

whats the result for

amazing production + shit tune? most radio pop releases??
Something that is sucked clean of all emotion and feeling. A grey slab of production.
joegrizzly wrote:
PERCEPT wrote:Lets be honest if Coki or Jakes were unknown and came in here later on today, we'd probably all be saying sweet tracks but you need to work on your mixdown a lot. But they're both two of my favourite artists, go figure.
I know this was written months ago, but really??? If some unknowns presented the same tunes i'd say good fucking job.. lol
It does raise a valid point TBH - if some raw tune that was amazing got posted in the Dubs board, no matter how amazing it was there would still be comments along the line of improving their mixdown.


I think it's as much to do with the ease of availability of mastering software as anything else. There is a base shift in the ethos of lot of production, the whole brostep scene is evidence as much of that. The mixdown has replaced the idea in terms of importance in a tune, hence why YouTube is overflowing with identikit sounding polished masses of dullness.

um4mi
Posts: 218
Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 5:33 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: The line between raw and badly produced

Post by um4mi » Fri Jan 06, 2012 9:48 pm

escapes wrote:This why the old boom bap 90s hip hop sounds so good ! All analog hardware and vinyl ! Keep it raw, nun of that sampling mp3s !
they also used 12 bit samplers a lot like the akai 900 or more likely an MPC 60

User avatar
hudson
Posts: 1307
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 10:09 pm

Re: The line between raw and badly produced

Post by hudson » Sat Jan 07, 2012 12:00 am

wub wrote:It does raise a valid point TBH - if some raw tune that was amazing got posted in the Dubs board, no matter how amazing it was there would still be comments along the line of improving their mixdown.
I think I disagree... In my experience people rarely mention the mixdown unless I explicitly ask for tips, and my mixdowns aren't usually that great.

User avatar
Ldizzy
Posts: 1651
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:47 am

Re: The line between raw and badly produced

Post by Ldizzy » Sat Jan 07, 2012 5:16 pm

official releases are often mixed and mastered...

but ive always tried to imagine a raw version of a beat...

i remember watching startrak's skateboarding dvds... beats were produced by pharrell but were not mixed or at least very badly and it was almost shameful... it really made me realize how important a mix can be
Sharmaji wrote:2011: the year of the calloused-from-overuse facepalm

wub
Posts: 34156
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Location: Madrid
Contact:

Re: The line between raw and badly produced

Post by wub » Sat Jan 07, 2012 5:16 pm

When the mix takes precedence over the ideas, that's when trouble begins.

Pedro Sánchez
Posts: 7727
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:15 pm
Location: ButtonMoon

Re: The line between raw and badly produced

Post by Pedro Sánchez » Sat Jan 07, 2012 5:19 pm

Jungle as a genre is a perfect example of rawness and crude production techniques creating some timeless magic.
Genevieve wrote:It's a universal law that the rich have to exploit the poor. Preferably violently.

tavravlavish
Posts: 1312
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 3:47 am
Location: seatroll

Re: The line between raw and badly produced

Post by tavravlavish » Sat Jan 07, 2012 8:25 pm

Pedro Sánchez wrote:Jungle as a genre is a perfect example of rawness and crude production techniques creating some timeless magic.

tavravlavish
Posts: 1312
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 3:47 am
Location: seatroll

Re: The line between raw and badly produced

Post by tavravlavish » Sat Jan 07, 2012 8:26 pm

um4mi wrote:
escapes wrote:This why the old boom bap 90s hip hop sounds so good ! All analog hardware and vinyl ! Keep it raw, nun of that sampling mp3s !
they also used 12 bit samplers a lot like the akai 900 or more likely an MPC 60
I gotz dat 12 bit reverb, no 12 bit sampler dough.

leeany
Posts: 1173
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2011 10:16 pm
Location: AMSTERDAM
Contact:

Re: The line between raw and badly produced

Post by leeany » Sat Jan 07, 2012 9:07 pm


this was the original raw mix of survival of the fittest. sounds pretty horrible.
the real release still sounds raw but way better, proving even raw tracks need a good mixdown

hhans
Posts: 89
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 1:17 am

Re: The line between raw and badly produced

Post by hhans » Thu Feb 28, 2013 7:43 pm

Really interesting thread. As someone who knows almost nothing about tape, how does one go about "running something through a tape"? Like what equipment do I need/how exactly do I do it? ...etc.

skimpi
Posts: 4241
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 1:25 am

Re: The line between raw and badly produced

Post by skimpi » Thu Feb 28, 2013 8:59 pm

hhans wrote:Really interesting thread. As someone who knows almost nothing about tape, how does one go about "running something through a tape"? Like what equipment do I need/how exactly do I do it? ...etc.
well, you need a tape machine lol
TopManLurka wrote: thanks for confirming
OiOiii #BELTER

hhans
Posts: 89
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 1:17 am

Re: The line between raw and badly produced

Post by hhans » Thu Feb 28, 2013 9:33 pm

skimpi wrote:
well, you need a tape machine lol
I figured as much, but what is the actual process?

User avatar
hudson
Posts: 1307
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 10:09 pm

Re: The line between raw and badly produced

Post by hudson » Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:07 pm

hhans wrote:
skimpi wrote:
well, you need a tape machine lol
I figured as much, but what is the actual process?
You record it to tape, then you record it back on to the computer

hhans
Posts: 89
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 1:17 am

Re: The line between raw and badly produced

Post by hhans » Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:11 am

hudson wrote: You record it to tape, then you record it back on to the computer
I should've known I'd have to play 20 questions with you guys. What specific gear would I need? Brand and model names would be great.

User avatar
hudson
Posts: 1307
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 10:09 pm

Re: The line between raw and badly produced

Post by hudson » Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:30 am

hhans wrote:
hudson wrote: You record it to tape, then you record it back on to the computer
I should've known I'd have to play 20 questions with you guys. What specific gear would I need? Brand and model names would be great.
No, you should have asked "what brand and model of tape machine would I need to do this" instead of "what is the process?". They're two completely different questions.
Anyways, buy one of these and some tape, probably a mixer and a few cables, and there you go...

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests