The line between raw and badly produced
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Re: The line between raw and badly produced
This why the old boom bap 90s hip hop sounds so good ! All analog hardware and vinyl ! Keep it raw, nun of that sampling mp3s !
Kryptic Minds seem to get it just right they that got that dirty organic yet clean sound.
Kryptic Minds seem to get it just right they that got that dirty organic yet clean sound.
Re: The line between raw and badly produced
no dude... some 90s hip hop sounded like shit...
the one u hear was either mixed in million dollar studios or crafted by VERY crafty people... and the beatmakers we all praise were tight on so many levels...
just type mpc 60 old school rap beat on utube and tell me that shit is dope...
the one u hear was either mixed in million dollar studios or crafted by VERY crafty people... and the beatmakers we all praise were tight on so many levels...
just type mpc 60 old school rap beat on utube and tell me that shit is dope...
Sharmaji wrote:2011: the year of the calloused-from-overuse facepalm
Re: The line between raw and badly produced
KM said in an interview that a lot of their drum sounds were recorded on a mobile phone, sounds of them hitting decaying tree logs with a stick to get a natural lo-fi snare sound.escapes wrote:This why the old boom bap 90s hip hop sounds so good ! All analog hardware and vinyl ! Keep it raw, nun of that sampling mp3s !
Kryptic Minds seem to get it just right they that got that dirty organic yet clean sound.
Spot on, which brings us back to the formula;Ldizzy wrote:no dude... some 90s hip hop sounded like shit...
the one u hear was either mixed in million dollar studios or crafted by VERY crafty people... and the beatmakers we all praise were tight on so many levels...
just type mpc 60 old school rap beat on utube and tell me that shit is dope...
shit production + amazing tune = raw
shit production + shit tune = shit
Re: The line between raw and badly produced
haha totally agree!!!
whats the result for
amazing production + shit tune? most radio pop releases??
whats the result for
amazing production + shit tune? most radio pop releases??
Sharmaji wrote:2011: the year of the calloused-from-overuse facepalm
-
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 7:22 pm
Re: The line between raw and badly produced
I know this was written months ago, but really??? If some unknowns presented the same tunes i'd say good fucking job.. lolPERCEPT wrote:Lets be honest if Coki or Jakes were unknown and came in here later on today, we'd probably all be saying sweet tracks but you need to work on your mixdown a lot. But they're both two of my favourite artists, go figure.
Re: The line between raw and badly produced
Something that is sucked clean of all emotion and feeling. A grey slab of production.Ldizzy wrote:haha totally agree!!!
whats the result for
amazing production + shit tune? most radio pop releases??
It does raise a valid point TBH - if some raw tune that was amazing got posted in the Dubs board, no matter how amazing it was there would still be comments along the line of improving their mixdown.joegrizzly wrote:I know this was written months ago, but really??? If some unknowns presented the same tunes i'd say good fucking job.. lolPERCEPT wrote:Lets be honest if Coki or Jakes were unknown and came in here later on today, we'd probably all be saying sweet tracks but you need to work on your mixdown a lot. But they're both two of my favourite artists, go figure.
I think it's as much to do with the ease of availability of mastering software as anything else. There is a base shift in the ethos of lot of production, the whole brostep scene is evidence as much of that. The mixdown has replaced the idea in terms of importance in a tune, hence why YouTube is overflowing with identikit sounding polished masses of dullness.
Re: The line between raw and badly produced
they also used 12 bit samplers a lot like the akai 900 or more likely an MPC 60escapes wrote:This why the old boom bap 90s hip hop sounds so good ! All analog hardware and vinyl ! Keep it raw, nun of that sampling mp3s !
Re: The line between raw and badly produced
I think I disagree... In my experience people rarely mention the mixdown unless I explicitly ask for tips, and my mixdowns aren't usually that great.wub wrote:It does raise a valid point TBH - if some raw tune that was amazing got posted in the Dubs board, no matter how amazing it was there would still be comments along the line of improving their mixdown.
Re: The line between raw and badly produced
official releases are often mixed and mastered...
but ive always tried to imagine a raw version of a beat...
i remember watching startrak's skateboarding dvds... beats were produced by pharrell but were not mixed or at least very badly and it was almost shameful... it really made me realize how important a mix can be
but ive always tried to imagine a raw version of a beat...
i remember watching startrak's skateboarding dvds... beats were produced by pharrell but were not mixed or at least very badly and it was almost shameful... it really made me realize how important a mix can be
Sharmaji wrote:2011: the year of the calloused-from-overuse facepalm
Re: The line between raw and badly produced
When the mix takes precedence over the ideas, that's when trouble begins.
-
- Posts: 7727
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:15 pm
- Location: ButtonMoon
Re: The line between raw and badly produced
Jungle as a genre is a perfect example of rawness and crude production techniques creating some timeless magic.
Genevieve wrote:It's a universal law that the rich have to exploit the poor. Preferably violently.
-
- Posts: 1312
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 3:47 am
- Location: seatroll
Re: The line between raw and badly produced
Pedro Sánchez wrote:Jungle as a genre is a perfect example of rawness and crude production techniques creating some timeless magic.
-
- Posts: 1312
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 3:47 am
- Location: seatroll
Re: The line between raw and badly produced
I gotz dat 12 bit reverb, no 12 bit sampler dough.um4mi wrote:they also used 12 bit samplers a lot like the akai 900 or more likely an MPC 60escapes wrote:This why the old boom bap 90s hip hop sounds so good ! All analog hardware and vinyl ! Keep it raw, nun of that sampling mp3s !
Re: The line between raw and badly produced
this was the original raw mix of survival of the fittest. sounds pretty horrible.
the real release still sounds raw but way better, proving even raw tracks need a good mixdown
Re: The line between raw and badly produced
Really interesting thread. As someone who knows almost nothing about tape, how does one go about "running something through a tape"? Like what equipment do I need/how exactly do I do it? ...etc.
Re: The line between raw and badly produced
well, you need a tape machine lolhhans wrote:Really interesting thread. As someone who knows almost nothing about tape, how does one go about "running something through a tape"? Like what equipment do I need/how exactly do I do it? ...etc.
OiOiii #BELTERTopManLurka wrote: thanks for confirming
Re: The line between raw and badly produced
I figured as much, but what is the actual process?skimpi wrote:
well, you need a tape machine lol
Re: The line between raw and badly produced
You record it to tape, then you record it back on to the computerhhans wrote:I figured as much, but what is the actual process?skimpi wrote:
well, you need a tape machine lol
Re: The line between raw and badly produced
I should've known I'd have to play 20 questions with you guys. What specific gear would I need? Brand and model names would be great.hudson wrote: You record it to tape, then you record it back on to the computer
Re: The line between raw and badly produced
No, you should have asked "what brand and model of tape machine would I need to do this" instead of "what is the process?". They're two completely different questions.hhans wrote:I should've known I'd have to play 20 questions with you guys. What specific gear would I need? Brand and model names would be great.hudson wrote: You record it to tape, then you record it back on to the computer
Anyways, buy one of these and some tape, probably a mixer and a few cables, and there you go...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests