Alternative proposal for benefits allocation

Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.

Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
User avatar
Mr Hyde
Posts: 2148
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 11:37 am
Location: SE26
Contact:

Re: Alternative proposal for benefits allocation

Post by Mr Hyde » Wed May 15, 2013 1:30 pm

Employers are taxed about 20% to pay you, you're then taxed about 20% on those earnings and then taxed 20% VAT on anything you buy, then more tax on things like stamp duty, and if after all that if you manage to save any money to pass onto your kids as inheritance that'll get taxed.

....so how about less whinging about the state not paying enough benefits, cut benefits and cut tax (so workers would have about 50% more income to spend on unemployment insurance/savings etc) and look after yourselves.

User avatar
magma
Posts: 18810
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Alternative proposal for benefits allocation

Post by magma » Wed May 15, 2013 1:37 pm

Mr Hyde wrote:Employers are taxed about 20% to pay you
Ey? Companies pay corporation tax on profits leftover after wages and other costs have been dealt with - the only person paying tax on a PAYE salary is the employee.
Meus equus tuo altior est

"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.

User avatar
Jizz
Posts: 3470
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:43 pm
Location: London

Re: Alternative proposal for benefits allocation

Post by Jizz » Wed May 15, 2013 1:49 pm

yeah agree with magma on this, class based on forms of currency will only create problems

User avatar
Pistonsbeneath
Posts: 10785
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 10:00 pm
Location: Croydon
Contact:

Re: Alternative proposal for benefits allocation

Post by Pistonsbeneath » Wed May 15, 2013 1:56 pm

And many many people have paid tax all their life...vast amounts if they had a well paid job and you're saying they should now lose out?
http://www.mixcloud.com/garethom/night-tracks-040-pistonsbeneath-guest-mix/

Soundcloud

BUY PISTONSBENEATH 24TH CENTURY EP CDS & DIGITAL

THREAD FOR MY GETDARKER SETS W/ YOUTUBE LINKS, ITUNES & DIRECT DOWNLOAD LINKS

SCA MIX

HEDMUK MIX

bookings - verity at subcultureartists.com

Genevieve
Posts: 8775
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:27 pm
Location: 6_6

Re: Alternative proposal for benefits allocation

Post by Genevieve » Wed May 15, 2013 2:02 pm



The damn internet didn't even exist when most people living today were born and now it's a fundamental human rights violation when someone doesn't have access to it?

It truly is the entitled generation.
Image

namsayin

:'0

User avatar
Mason
Posts: 1928
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:41 pm
Location: Birmingham

Re: Alternative proposal for benefits allocation

Post by Mason » Wed May 15, 2013 2:06 pm

loool at internet being a human right what a load of bollocks
Soundcloud
TopManLurka wrote:sycophants gon sycophant.

scspkr99
Posts: 1998
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 11:55 am

Re: Alternative proposal for benefits allocation

Post by scspkr99 » Wed May 15, 2013 2:12 pm

wub wrote:
Riddles wrote:It might help to reduce the negativity directed at people who claim benefits maybe, if people knew they could only spend it on necessary stuff
A massive upshot, given the state of the economy and apathy towards 'scroungers' in the red tops.
An upshot for who, the people receiving vouchers instead of benefits or those that would pass judgement on them? I'd be way more concerned with receiving vouchers than I would be the attitudes of the ignorant.

I'd like those who could to send the government vouchers for ethical government spending rather than actual taxes given the government feels entitled to tell people how to spend the benefits they receive.

User avatar
Pistonsbeneath
Posts: 10785
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 10:00 pm
Location: Croydon
Contact:

Re: Alternative proposal for benefits allocation

Post by Pistonsbeneath » Wed May 15, 2013 2:18 pm

Mason wrote:loool at internet being a human right what a load of bollocks
Without the internet people can't apply for jobs now...the employers insist on it
http://www.mixcloud.com/garethom/night-tracks-040-pistonsbeneath-guest-mix/

Soundcloud

BUY PISTONSBENEATH 24TH CENTURY EP CDS & DIGITAL

THREAD FOR MY GETDARKER SETS W/ YOUTUBE LINKS, ITUNES & DIRECT DOWNLOAD LINKS

SCA MIX

HEDMUK MIX

bookings - verity at subcultureartists.com

User avatar
DRTY
Posts: 7900
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:08 pm
Location: Bournemouth

Re: Alternative proposal for benefits allocation

Post by DRTY » Wed May 15, 2013 2:19 pm

the internet is a crazy place. A lot of bad things happened because of it, and a lot of good, so meh.

User avatar
Mason
Posts: 1928
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:41 pm
Location: Birmingham

Re: Alternative proposal for benefits allocation

Post by Mason » Wed May 15, 2013 2:20 pm

Without a pen people couldn't handwrite applications 10 years ago doesn't make a pen a human right.
Soundcloud
TopManLurka wrote:sycophants gon sycophant.

User avatar
Mason
Posts: 1928
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:41 pm
Location: Birmingham

Re: Alternative proposal for benefits allocation

Post by Mason » Wed May 15, 2013 2:28 pm

without a car some people can't get to work is a car a human right?
without a phone some people can't have interviews for a job is a phone a human right?
etc etc
Soundcloud
TopManLurka wrote:sycophants gon sycophant.

Dystinkt
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 8:36 pm
Location: Bradford, UK

Re: Alternative proposal for benefits allocation

Post by Dystinkt » Wed May 15, 2013 3:09 pm

Not supporting the voucher idea, but if I gave someone money to get them through the week and they spent it on an xbox and weed I'd be pretty fucked off

User avatar
lovelydivot
Posts: 2265
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 7:44 pm

Re: Alternative proposal for benefits allocation

Post by lovelydivot » Wed May 15, 2013 3:24 pm

We are going to have to face the fact - That right now...

There isn't enough plugs for all the people that want access...
Last edited by lovelydivot on Wed May 15, 2013 3:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Pedro Sánchez
Posts: 7727
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:15 pm
Location: ButtonMoon

Re: Alternative proposal for benefits allocation

Post by Pedro Sánchez » Wed May 15, 2013 3:27 pm

Hypothetical for a single person living on his jones.
Housing Benefit goes to the landlord (limit capped by LHA if private)
Council Tax Benefit goes to Council
£71p/w JSA goes to...
Gas Water Electric (Call it £30 give or take depending where you live)
Travel for shopping and Job searching activities plus visiting relatives (£12-15)
Food and general shopping (£25pw if you are being careful)
Clothing or replacing things that need repair or have broke down???
*edit Credit for phone???
WHERE AM I GETTING 39.99 FOR AN XBOX GAME?
Last edited by Pedro Sánchez on Wed May 15, 2013 3:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Genevieve wrote:It's a universal law that the rich have to exploit the poor. Preferably violently.

User avatar
Forum
Posts: 10686
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:55 am
Location: J R Hartley

Re: Alternative proposal for benefits allocation

Post by Forum » Wed May 15, 2013 3:29 pm

Pedro Sánchez wrote:Hypothetical for a single person living on his jones.
Housing Benefit goes to the landlord (limit capped by LHA if private)
Council Tax Benefit goes to Council
£71p/w JSA goes to...
Gas Water Electric (Call it £30 give or take depending where you live)
Travel for shopping and Job searching activities plus visiting relatives (£12-15)
Food and general shopping (£25pw if you are being careful)
Clothing or replacing things that need repair or have broke down???
WHERE AM I GETTING 39.99 FOR AN XBOX GAME?
Image
Image Image

User avatar
magma
Posts: 18810
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Alternative proposal for benefits allocation

Post by magma » Wed May 15, 2013 3:35 pm

Cheeky wrote:Not supporting the voucher idea, but if I gave someone money to get them through the week and they spent it on an xbox and weed I'd be pretty fucked off
This is the crux of it, I think. People have very different relationships with the money they receive and people's priorities are as individual as their fingerprints. If you personally give a friend money for a specific purpose and they misuse it, you have the right to be pissed off, to ask for your money back and maybe to punch them in the face for the disrespect; but that isn't what's happening when the country gives money via the Welfare State.

Just about all benefits are means-tested these days now that child credits and family allowance have bitten the bullet; so people should only be given money that is earmarked for a valid expense. Of course, once the hits their account it's entirely up to them what to do with it... 'benefits' aren't gifts, they're not a savings scheme that you pay into whilst you work and then claim when you don't want to work anymore, they're a necessary insurance scheme that makes the country work. The unemployed don't have to steal from the employed. When a 'benefit' is paid to someone in need, it benefits everyone.

Benefits shouldn't be seen as gifts or "handouts". The country, society being a natural extension of the family, has an obligation to give its citizens opportunities; it's then up to the citizens what they do with those opportunities. We're all given education, we're all afforded a roof, we're all treated when we're sick, we're all given enough to survive if/when the worst happens, we're all allowed to vote to decide the government of the country. It's every person's right to waste every opportunity their given by their country (or, indeed, their parents) - I'm sure most of us have failed the odd exam, skipped a day's school or turned up the opportunity to vote - yet we don't ask for rights to be taken away from people that do this.... why are wasted cash 'benefits' seen as such a huge issue compared to the other things society lets us fritter away? A wasted education costs a LOT more than a family allowance wasted on Special Brew.... so why do we laugh at the naughty kid in class asking "What am I ever going to use Maths for?", but glare at the family he comes from? A high-stress career spent slurping espesso and yamming business dinners might lead to medical ailments that cause an unfair burden on a person's family and the NHS in later life; yet this sort of behaviour is lionised rather than regarded as selfish and short-sighted.

Everyone plays this game differently. All Government can do is prepare the playing field and let us get on with winning and losing at it.

The idea that poor people should have less fun than rich people is a DISTINCTLY WORRYING ONE. We all need to be able to socialise. We all need recreation time. We all need escape from our routines, even if they don't involve going to work. The poor are people; they can't be left sitting silently in their houses until a generous employer knocks on the front door and asks them if they want a job.
Meus equus tuo altior est

"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.

Pedro Sánchez
Posts: 7727
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:15 pm
Location: ButtonMoon

Re: Alternative proposal for benefits allocation

Post by Pedro Sánchez » Wed May 15, 2013 3:37 pm

magma wrote:The idea that poor people should have less fun than rich people is a DISTINCTLY WORRYING ONE. We all need to be able to socialise. We all need recreation time. We all need escape from our routines, even if they don't involve going to work. The poor are people; they can't be left sitting silently in their houses until a generous employer knocks on the front door and asks them if they want a job.
:Q: Nail on the head...I wish I could use that same nail to crucify IDS with.
Genevieve wrote:It's a universal law that the rich have to exploit the poor. Preferably violently.

scspkr99
Posts: 1998
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 11:55 am

Re: Alternative proposal for benefits allocation

Post by scspkr99 » Wed May 15, 2013 3:40 pm

Cheeky wrote:Not supporting the voucher idea, but if I gave someone money to get them through the week and they spent it on an xbox and weed I'd be pretty fucked off
what if they earned that money?

User avatar
Mr Hyde
Posts: 2148
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 11:37 am
Location: SE26
Contact:

Re: Alternative proposal for benefits allocation

Post by Mr Hyde » Wed May 15, 2013 3:47 pm

magma wrote:
Mr Hyde wrote:Employers are taxed about 20% to pay you
Ey? Companies pay corporation tax on profits leftover after wages and other costs have been dealt with - the only person paying tax on a PAYE salary is the employee.
I don't know the ins-and outs of tax for everyone, but I work at a place where I process payments for consultants and temps, if someone charges £100 a day then the company needs to pay them 20% tax on top of that payment so we pay out £120 to the employee. I guess they then just pay tax on that £120 earned so it's like they earned £100.
Last edited by Mr Hyde on Wed May 15, 2013 3:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
magma
Posts: 18810
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Alternative proposal for benefits allocation

Post by magma » Wed May 15, 2013 3:48 pm

Mr Hyde wrote:
magma wrote:
Mr Hyde wrote:Employers are taxed about 20% to pay you
Ey? Companies pay corporation tax on profits leftover after wages and other costs have been dealt with - the only person paying tax on a PAYE salary is the employee.
I don't know the ins-and outs of tax for everyone, but I work at a place where I process payments for consultants and temps, if someone charges £100 a day then the company needs to pay them 20% VAT on top of that payment so we pay out £120 to the employee.
Yes, but (assuming they turnover more than £40k per year) the company gets to claim the VAT back from the taxman.

Only consumers should pay VAT.
Meus equus tuo altior est

"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests