When does a track become "too simple"
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
-
bennyfroobs
- Posts: 4532
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:52 am
- Location: the rainy north
Re: When does a track become "too simple"
MOD EDIT - Please try and keep the thread civil and engage in discussion/conversation rather than name calling.
TopManLurka wrote:FTR, requirements for being a 'head':
-you have to be youngsta
-you must have been in that infamous room of ten people.
-a DMZ release is preferable but not necessary.
-please note that being youngsta is mandatory.
Re: When does a track become "too simple"
.
Blaze it -4.20dB
nowaysj wrote:Raising a girl in this jizz filled world is not the easiest thing.
If I ever get banned I'll come back as SpunkLo, just you mark my words.Phigure wrote:I haven't heard such a beautiful thing since that time Jesus sang Untrue
-
Samuel_L_Damnson
- Posts: 3485
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 11:53 pm
- Location: YORKSHIRE!!!!!!!!!!
Re: When does a track become "too simple"
dont be a wilkins. I hear it at like 140, otherwise youd be dancing around in half time which i swear feels like the worst thing ever. imhomromgwtf wrote:It's 70 br0Sinestepper wrote:wot u tawkinn abowt?norman swashbuckle wrote: i don't include dubstep in this as you can't dance to it,
Srsly though, dubstep is easily danceable and has that 140 pulse. Have you ever been to a dubstep night, people dance all night to it not counting bro which just sounds like wank).
Re: When does a track become "too simple"
>assuming dancing to dubstep isn't the worst thing everSinestepper wrote:dont be a wilkins. I hear it at like 140, otherwise youd be dancing around in half time which i swear feels like the worst thing ever. imhomromgwtf wrote:It's 70 br0Sinestepper wrote:wot u tawkinn abowt?norman swashbuckle wrote: i don't include dubstep in this as you can't dance to it,
Srsly though, dubstep is easily danceable and has that 140 pulse. Have you ever been to a dubstep night, people dance all night to it not counting bro which just sounds like wank).
Exilium wrote:distorted square
-
bennyfroobs
- Posts: 4532
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:52 am
- Location: the rainy north
Re: When does a track become "too simple"
shame my comment was edited, its appropriateness levels are only increasing
mromgwtf, stuff doesnt just become magically awesome because you run it through nice hardware. a shit song is gonna sound shit even if u process it with nice analogue stuff.
and dancing to dubstep isnt the worst thing ever? sometimes when its like 30 minutes of ploppy halftime dungeon it gets very boring but stick on some dub war or old horsepower with that cheeky 2step groove and its a recipie for delicious butt shakin all night long. i guess some dubstep is a lot more dancable than others tho (for honkeys with no moves)
mromgwtf, stuff doesnt just become magically awesome because you run it through nice hardware. a shit song is gonna sound shit even if u process it with nice analogue stuff.
and dancing to dubstep isnt the worst thing ever? sometimes when its like 30 minutes of ploppy halftime dungeon it gets very boring but stick on some dub war or old horsepower with that cheeky 2step groove and its a recipie for delicious butt shakin all night long. i guess some dubstep is a lot more dancable than others tho (for honkeys with no moves)
TopManLurka wrote:FTR, requirements for being a 'head':
-you have to be youngsta
-you must have been in that infamous room of ten people.
-a DMZ release is preferable but not necessary.
-please note that being youngsta is mandatory.
Re: When does a track become "too simple"
Haha I actually like dancing in half time... I'm complete shit at it but it's fun to try to do those slow robot moves, lolSinestepper wrote:dont be a wilkins. I hear it at like 140, otherwise youd be dancing around in half time which i swear feels like the worst thing ever. imhomromgwtf wrote:It's 70 br0Sinestepper wrote:wot u tawkinn abowt?norman swashbuckle wrote: i don't include dubstep in this as you can't dance to it,
Srsly though, dubstep is easily danceable and has that 140 pulse. Have you ever been to a dubstep night, people dance all night to it not counting bro which just sounds like wank).
WolfCryOfficial wrote:Have fun on your musical campaign to hell.
Re: When does a track become "too simple"
Let's just finish this thread off with the answer, "When it becomes boring."
Blaze it -4.20dB
nowaysj wrote:Raising a girl in this jizz filled world is not the easiest thing.
If I ever get banned I'll come back as SpunkLo, just you mark my words.Phigure wrote:I haven't heard such a beautiful thing since that time Jesus sang Untrue
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests