320

ushushnz · Post by **ushushnz** » Mon Jul 27, 2009 7:27 am

Second thread in a week? Give me a fucking break!

_boring · Post by **_boring** » Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:36 am

i like me a wav

deadly_habit · Post by **deadly_habit** » Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:56 am

mpfreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

deamonds · Post by **deamonds** » Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:57 am

is this thread for real?

deadly_habit · Post by **deadly_habit** » Mon Jul 27, 2009 9:01 am

deamonds wrote:is this thread for real?

thats what she said

cr1tt3r · Post by **cr1tt3r** » Tue Jul 28, 2009 3:57 pm

-boring wrote:i like me a wav

FLAC OFF!

shift decimal · Post by **shift decimal** » Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:00 am

CR1TT3R wrote:This thread is a coke-smoke! Fucking cracked me up so bad, mad hate for 320... and 420 is just a puff away

Bong on bro!

wat · Post by **wat** » Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:49 am

djrodan wrote:sorry, but i always thought 320 vbr mp3 was the standard.

did i fuck up somehow by buying all my tracks from beatport, junodl, etc in 320 mp3 and is it some type of sacrilege to be playing them in serato... at home... in clubs... on massive systems where there is no audible compromising of quality?

i thought i had a pretty good audiophile ear and knowledge of sound and digital audio theory.... or have i been wrong this whole time.... or is this thread just a big waste of time?

Nah your ears are fine.. 320 should work.. But some people prefer .wav or .flac over mp3.. good for them

I prefer vinyl

kingthing · Post by **kingthing** » Fri Aug 14, 2009 1:50 pm

sorry to hypocritically contribute, but this thread = jebstep

LA_Boxers · Post by **LA_Boxers** » Thu Aug 12, 2010 4:00 pm

deamonds wrote:is this thread for real?

No its actually a 192 pretending to be a 320.

Realityyyy · Post by **Realityyyy** » Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:33 pm

this thread is fail

dro524 · Post by **dro524** » Sat Aug 14, 2010 7:22 am

djrodan wrote:sorry, but i always thought 320 vbr mp3 was the standard.

did i fuck up somehow by buying all my tracks from beatport, junodl, etc in 320 mp3 and is it some type of sacrilege to be playing them in serato... at home... in clubs... on massive systems where there is no audible compromising of quality?

i thought i had a pretty good audiophile ear and knowledge of sound and digital audio theory.... or have i been wrong this whole time.... or is this thread just a big waste of time?

I think most people don't even notice the difference.

deadly_habit · Post by **deadly_habit** » Sat Aug 14, 2010 7:38 am

spambot bumps year old thread
people don't notice and reply

aftee · Post by **aftee** » Sat Aug 14, 2010 10:51 am

deadly habit wrote:spambot bumps year old thread
people don't notice and reply

Threads should be moved to archive or something once they go so long without a reply.

thinking · Post by **thinking** » Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:26 pm

not really bothered about the rest of the thread but I couldn't agree more with this:

fearless wrote:- maybe if the process currently being used to get your 'track' heard wasn't so simple and accessible, people would put more time/effort/thought into making their tracks..

there are SO MANY shit tracks out there which choke out the good ones. I wish people had a little more self-discipline and learnt how to write beats in private, as opposed to the millions of threads stating "First attempt at dubstep" or "Feedback needed".

In some ways I miss the inherent quality control introduced by the cost thresholds dubplate culture. The accessibility and enablement of CDJs/Traktor and hi-res MP3s has been both a blessing and a curse.

DRTY · Post by **DRTY** » Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:30 pm

aftee wrote:
deadly habit wrote:spambot bumps year old thread
people don't notice and reply

Threads should be moved to archive or something once they go so long without a reply.

Was thinking this t'other day, must use alot of space having literally everything available.

bishbosh05 · Post by **bishbosh05** » Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:46 pm

I'm gonna throw it out there and say that the Free 320 Giveaway's caame about because of artists giving away limited 320's or upon request 320's. Then people wanted more people to hear it so they just give em out left right and centre. It's just what happens. gotta live with it.

pure · Post by **pure** » Sat Oct 09, 2010 10:10 pm

yeah f*ck these 320s.......

http://www.dubstepforum.com/pure-nico-f ... 63748.html

320 coming soon for this http://www.dubstepforum.com/wiley-still ... 64455.html

DFRNT · Post by **DFRNT** » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:28 pm

fearless wrote: - maybe if the process currently being used to get your 'track' heard wasn't so simple and accessible, people would put more time/effort/thought into making their tracks.. same can be said for the tools used to make the track..

- maybe you were having fun sharing your '320' to the masses, but as a result did you make this music 2x as disposable as before.. same goes for your 'mixes'

- 2-3 years ago, you didn't find this '320' business as prominent a trend as it is now.. all you have to do is look on any web mp3 store to occasionally see things advertised as being 'now available in 320'

Really it sounds to me like all you're saying here is "can people stop posting shit music" - potentially disguised as a rant at the 320 thing.

For me, 320 is the easiest format to fire out tracks in. I provide wavs when they get released, or sometimes if someone asks nicely, but in general - it's a widely recognised format, it requires minimal effort - and I think you'd be a fool to assume that just because someone's encoded in the easiest, presumably most widely acceptable format - that they've not put as much effort in to their tunes.

Part of me says - look, if you're not in to it, then don't download the stuff - ignore the threads, or go elsewhere to post - but I think that's a cheap way out of a forum discussion. The other part of me says - consider what you're really annoyed about - is it the 320 thing, or does that just seem to go hand in hand with downloading a bunch of crap tunes. Any genre, and forum on the genre is going to have stuff you like and stuff you don't. Half the fun is finding the good stuff - it can give something more value, if you've had to search a bit harder for it.

I agree that it can help a producer to append their post with "320" to drum up a bit more interest - but can you blame them? It's becoming harder and harder to get yourself heard in a genre expanding as fast as this.

pure · Post by **pure** » Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:03 pm

pure wrote:yeah f*ck these 320s.......

320 coming soon for this http://www.dubstepforum.com/wiley-still ... 64455.html

http://www.speedyshare.com/files/246248 ... eRemix.mp3

Re:

Re: 320

Re:

Re: 320

Re: 320

Re:

Re: 320

Re: 320

Re: 320

Re:

Re: 320

Who is online