i'm gonna say cause their product cost too much and last support time i needed them was sx 2 they were pirated like madhurlingdervish wrote:im going to be an asshole and say its cause they are germandeadly habit wrote:much as i love steinburg for cubase and whole vst platform they are always last to adapt and worst custy supportnowaysj wrote:I've seen A LOT of extremely disgruntled steiny people. Was just reading a thread about their bit bridge, fucking hilarious. Steiny said they can't guarantee that all third party vst's will work with their bridge, then someone hoisted them in saying that their own 32 bit vst's don't work with their bridge. Steiny's response - go buy jbridge! HA HA HA! I've never seen such a big fuck u from a corp developer. HA HA HA.nitz wrote:This is why you got a well known DAW and pay for it, because if anything does go wrong they will sort it out for you!
From what I can tell, reapers squad is WAY more responsive to user requests.
I've seen the same level of dissatisfaction from logic and sonar heads as well, so I don't know what the solution is really. Just keep doing what ur doing?
serious question: Which DAW to use?
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
Think about it - Emagic/logic back in the day, steiny, native instruments, ableton. Who else? All german assholes
That is wat I call a lot of sour kraut.
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
see im older cubase black and white on atari and still getting updates on octamed on amiga platform new versionnowaysj wrote:Think about it - Emagic/logic back in the day, steiny, native instruments, ableton. Who else? All german assholesThat is wat I call a lot of sour kraut.
- hurlingdervish
- Posts: 2971
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:37 pm
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
nowaysj wrote:Think about it - Emagic/logic back in the day, steiny, native instruments, ableton. Who else? All german assholesThat is wat I call a lot of sour kraut.
yea see the answer for those programs successes is also german engineering
so so far we have
GERMAN STEREOTYPES:
-ASSHOLES
-SOFTWARE ENGINEERS
-FANS OF DOMINATRIX*
*seems right.
- hurlingdervish
- Posts: 2971
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:37 pm
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
they don't even have a demo of the new versiondeadly habit wrote: i'm gonna say cause their product cost too much and last support time i needed them was sx 2 they were pirated like mad
lame.
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
Really doubt that. I think they came early, and they came hardhurlingdervish wrote: yea see the answer for those programs successes is also german engineering![]()
German software is unnecessarily complicated without a care in the world for user experience. Everything is compartmentalized and discrete. Nothing is dynamic and context sensitive.
I mean it took them to get to cubase 5 to offer a 1/10 of the functionality of fruity with that beat maker groove agent thing. ha ha ha. Welcome to the party fuckers, have a waffle.
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
- hurlingdervish
- Posts: 2971
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:37 pm
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
welcome to not playing along with my bad jokesnowaysj wrote:Really doubt that. I think they came early, and they came hardhurlingdervish wrote: yea see the answer for those programs successes is also german engineering![]()
German software is unnecessarily complicated without a care in the world for user experience. Everything is compartmentalized and discrete. Nothing is dynamic and context sensitive.
I mean it took them to get to cubase 5 to offer a 1/10 of the functionality of fruity with that beat maker groove agent thing. ha ha ha. Welcome to the party fuckers, have a waffle.
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
fl studio is still a fucking joke when it comes to audio if we want to be serious
welcome to why i went ot cubase
even fl9 sucks for ausio editing or recording
production beats and shit: fl
serious ausio: cubase, pro tools or go to mac and logic or hell sonar
fl is a joke when you go beyond making beats for ease
welcome to why i went ot cubase
even fl9 sucks for ausio editing or recording
production beats and shit: fl
serious ausio: cubase, pro tools or go to mac and logic or hell sonar
fl is a joke when you go beyond making beats for ease
-
deadly_habit
- Posts: 22980
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:41 am
- Location: MURRICA
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
blah and before backlash
i made some of my best tunes in fl etc and know plenty who use
its just ass backwards when it comes to audio
if cubase and fl had a bastard child id be in heaven
i made some of my best tunes in fl etc and know plenty who use
its just ass backwards when it comes to audio
if cubase and fl had a bastard child id be in heaven
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
They made it worse for audio in 9. I used to run my 8 projects at 900 something ppq, which let me zoom in pretty good to make audio edits in the playlist. But the cpu overhead to do that in 9 is through the roof. 1/2 the reason I've entered the cube.
I mean, grabing moving, zoom audio in fl's playlist is superior, imo of course, to cubases. But cubase's sample accurate zooming in playlist... fucking hell, I am TIGHTENING MY SHIT UP.
But I find it funny that after all this time they come out with the beat designer. Its a fischer price toy compared to fl's step sequencer, which allow 64 beats, so a nice 4 bar drum loop, per beat per voice velocity, pan, pitch, release, note shift (if y'all don't know what that is, check it). Cubase's allows 16 steps and velocity. Anyone have a screen shot of fruity from 99 handy? ha.
I mean, grabing moving, zoom audio in fl's playlist is superior, imo of course, to cubases. But cubase's sample accurate zooming in playlist... fucking hell, I am TIGHTENING MY SHIT UP.
But I find it funny that after all this time they come out with the beat designer. Its a fischer price toy compared to fl's step sequencer, which allow 64 beats, so a nice 4 bar drum loop, per beat per voice velocity, pan, pitch, release, note shift (if y'all don't know what that is, check it). Cubase's allows 16 steps and velocity. Anyone have a screen shot of fruity from 99 handy? ha.
- youthful_implants
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:42 am
- Location: wheel up the tune fast like ramadan
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
Ableton innit, just cos the plugz are more fun than Cubase which is what I normally use.
I think Logic is unnecessariily unintuitive and slow for audio so its a no no from me.
I think Logic is unnecessariily unintuitive and slow for audio so its a no no from me.
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
Haha this is why am on reason haahnowaysj wrote:I've seen A LOT of extremely disgruntled steiny people. Was just reading a thread about their bit bridge, fucking hilarious. Steiny said they can't guarantee that all third party vst's will work with their bridge, then someone hoisted them in saying that their own 32 bit vst's don't work with their bridge. Steiny's response - go buy jbridge! HA HA HA! I've never seen such a big fuck u from a corp developer. HA HA HA.nitz wrote:This is why you got a well known DAW and pay for it, because if anything does go wrong they will sort it out for you!
From what I can tell, reapers squad is WAY more responsive to user requests.
I've seen the same level of dissatisfaction from logic and sonar heads as well, so I don't know what the solution is really. Just keep doing what ur doing?
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
Yeah, like reason heads haven't been complaining about vst support since version2 
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
ima go head and say get Ableton.
but at the end of the day it doesnt matter what your use its the end results that count, and any daw can get you there.
i use ableton and it has never let me down.
but at the end of the day it doesnt matter what your use its the end results that count, and any daw can get you there.
i use ableton and it has never let me down.
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
jsills wrote:ima go head and say get Ableton.
but at the end of the day it doesnt matter what your use its the end results that count, and any daw can get you there.
i use ableton and it has never let me down.
I don't complain, and i know many people who don't.. we are fine with out themnowaysj wrote:Yeah, like reason heads haven't been complaining about vst support since version2
and yes to what nowaysj said, a good producer once told me "its not what you use its how you use it" i still believe that to some extend.
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
is Sonar going to be a forgotten DAW. I always hear complaints...and it seems like no one is using that shit.
And the last version I used of Logic was on PC. it was indeed unnecessarily unintiuitive...and the manual explained things in a very roundabout way, and still got me nowhere.
and the audio factory or sample factory was retarded
And the last version I used of Logic was on PC. it was indeed unnecessarily unintiuitive...and the manual explained things in a very roundabout way, and still got me nowhere.
and the audio factory or sample factory was retarded
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
That was a train wreck. The design of the code was bad enough, but the actual implementation of the design on the pc was just straight swiss cheeze.86. wrote:And the last version I used of Logic was on PC
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
Nowaysj is right on the money.nitz wrote:...and yes to what nowaysj said, a good producer once told me "its not what you use its how you use it" i still believe that to some extend.
I mean, Scratch Perry was recording on homemade gear in a dirt-floored former chicken shack;
Burial used one program - a sound editor, not a high-end tracking app - for his first record;
Hive made his first album entirely on an MPC without any Mac or PC whatsoever...
...the list goes on and on.
Sometimes in fact having technical limitations can be a blessing and make you better at the whole thing because it forces you to understand, overcome, and ultimately make lemons out of lemonade, so to speak.
Jodorowsky wrote:Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness.
Re: serious question: Which DAW to use?
One of the reasons Reason is so good, pure lemon. 
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
