
Skrillex, Borgore, heavily processed bass : explained!
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
Re: Skrillex, Borgore, heavily processed bass : explained!
haha 

aka blinkesko
Soundcloud
Jesus Loves Electro - Burning Love (Augment remix)
Spotify: http://spoti.fi/1m5GUjL
iTunes: http://bit.ly/1iHWose
Soundcloud
Jesus Loves Electro - Burning Love (Augment remix)
Spotify: http://spoti.fi/1m5GUjL
iTunes: http://bit.ly/1iHWose
-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:55 am
- Location: Edmonton, Alberta Canada.
Re: Skrillex, Borgore, heavily processed bass : explained!
today im gonna mess around with splitting frequencies on the bass.
any thoughts ?
any thoughts ?
Swaggr wrote:sucks ass posting at the end of the page! gotten like 1 person to give feedback on this song
Re: Skrillex, Borgore, heavily processed bass : explained!
go for it. also add some fast delay on there ... gives it a robotic quality.Specimen-Yarp wrote:today im gonna mess around with splitting frequencies on the bass.
any thoughts ?
Re: Skrillex, Borgore, heavily processed bass : explained!
read on doa's grid. thats my thought.
and dont limit yourself.. experiment... no rules...
and dont limit yourself.. experiment... no rules...
Sharmaji wrote:2011: the year of the calloused-from-overuse facepalm
-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:55 am
- Location: Edmonton, Alberta Canada.
Re: Skrillex, Borgore, heavily processed bass : explained!
F*** yeah man, no limits, id say almost every good bass has most likely been made from trial and error... trying things that people would say wont work, and making them work
Swaggr wrote:sucks ass posting at the end of the page! gotten like 1 person to give feedback on this song
Re: Skrillex, Borgore, heavily processed bass : explained!
amen.Specimen-Yarp wrote:F*** yeah man, no limits, id say almost every good bass has most likely been made from trial and error... trying things that people would say wont work, and making them work
i have a thought to share :
ive always seen things this way concerning rule bending :
theres what i call the punk-like approach... where u kinda break whatever u believe is a rule... to make things work however u feel they should work...
and theres what i refer to as the jazz-like approach... where u start off learning all of the rules, and master them.. and then.. break them
both are good. as long as u put ur whole soul into it, and self-criticize..
Sharmaji wrote:2011: the year of the calloused-from-overuse facepalm
Re: Skrillex, Borgore, heavily processed bass : explained!
Tbh there are some real good tips and links in this topic, if you're into this kind of stuff. I read through most of the old datsik/excision topics, and the techniques they explain are quite good in general. Though what most people seem to forget is that you can't just add all the effects you want and hope you get a CLEAN sound that actually sounds well made.
If you wanna go for processing and resampling your sound, it's important to first understand how your base sound works and what you can and cannot do, what makes it actually sound better and what makes it just sound 'filthy' yet too distorted/unclean (which is IMO where most 'filth' producers nowadays go wrong, and where a good set of monitors come in REAL handy).
I experimented alot with it and imo granular fx chains and layering gets you the closest (again, understand what they do, how they combine and when you can safely apply
), and I put it all together this weekend and got this result:
Reign vs Datsik
I started off with a single saw oscillator in Massive, so the trick really lies in just knowing what you're doing I think.
Hope this was of any use to anyone looking to produce harder dubstep
If you wanna go for processing and resampling your sound, it's important to first understand how your base sound works and what you can and cannot do, what makes it actually sound better and what makes it just sound 'filthy' yet too distorted/unclean (which is IMO where most 'filth' producers nowadays go wrong, and where a good set of monitors come in REAL handy).
I experimented alot with it and imo granular fx chains and layering gets you the closest (again, understand what they do, how they combine and when you can safely apply

Reign vs Datsik
I started off with a single saw oscillator in Massive, so the trick really lies in just knowing what you're doing I think.
Hope this was of any use to anyone looking to produce harder dubstep

-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:55 am
- Location: Edmonton, Alberta Canada.
Re: Skrillex, Borgore, heavily processed bass : explained!
WOWWW. please expand on what you did to that bass.... im actually in love with that sound !reignz wrote:Tbh there are some real good tips and links in this topic, if you're into this kind of stuff. I read through most of the old datsik/excision topics, and the techniques they explain are quite good in general. Though what most people seem to forget is that you can't just add all the effects you want and hope you get a CLEAN sound that actually sounds well made.
If you wanna go for processing and resampling your sound, it's important to first understand how your base sound works and what you can and cannot do, what makes it actually sound better and what makes it just sound 'filthy' yet too distorted/unclean (which is IMO where most 'filth' producers nowadays go wrong, and where a good set of monitors come in REAL handy).
I experimented alot with it and imo granular fx chains and layering gets you the closest (again, understand what they do, how they combine and when you can safely apply), and I put it all together this weekend and got this result:
Reign vs Datsik
I started off with a single saw oscillator in Massive, so the trick really lies in just knowing what you're doing I think.
Hope this was of any use to anyone looking to produce harder dubstep
Swaggr wrote:sucks ass posting at the end of the page! gotten like 1 person to give feedback on this song
-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:55 am
- Location: Edmonton, Alberta Canada.
Re: Skrillex, Borgore, heavily processed bass : explained!
can somebody PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE FUCKING PLEASE
try and help me get this sound
if you listen to people on rottun records you have to have heard it
Soundcloud
and i know im not the only one who wants this sound guys, its just tooo fucking good
try and help me get this sound
if you listen to people on rottun records you have to have heard it
Soundcloud
and i know im not the only one who wants this sound guys, its just tooo fucking good
Swaggr wrote:sucks ass posting at the end of the page! gotten like 1 person to give feedback on this song
Re: Skrillex, Borgore, heavily processed bass : explained!
ok well just layer a sub bass with a high screechy noise, a bit of LFO on pitch, and call yourself Dr. PSpecimen-Yarp wrote:can somebody PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE FUCKING PLEASE
try and help me get this sound
if you listen to people on rottun records you have to have heard it
Soundcloud
and i know im not the only one who wants this sound guys, its just tooo fucking good

-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:55 am
- Location: Edmonton, Alberta Canada.
Re: Skrillex, Borgore, heavily processed bass : explained!
........ that would be nice.... you dont understand how badly i wanna make this bass.
Swaggr wrote:sucks ass posting at the end of the page! gotten like 1 person to give feedback on this song
Re: Skrillex, Borgore, heavily processed bass : explained!
bet while you have spent so much time working to get that exact bass, you have passed by many that would be much better and give you your own sound..
http://elandingpage.comandyyhitscar wrote:I really want to know the cause because it is a beast bass system. It is cube sized, a little smaller than a dope microwave.
-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:55 am
- Location: Edmonton, Alberta Canada.
Re: Skrillex, Borgore, heavily processed bass : explained!
true, but at the same time...... haha. im in love with this bass, its not a matter of me making my own, it would be the joy in knowing it exists in my folder full of massive patches, so that if the time comes, i have the comfort in knowing its there, and ready to be usedoprs wrote:bet while you have spent so much time working to get that exact bass, you have passed by many that would be much better and give you your own sound..

Swaggr wrote:sucks ass posting at the end of the page! gotten like 1 person to give feedback on this song
Re: Skrillex, Borgore, heavily processed bass : explained!
Actually , no. Did I get myself a shitload of new presets and fx chain presets? Yes , and can I work from new , other base sounds to get my own sound through the techniques I learned? Hell yesoprs wrote:bet while you have spent so much time working to get that exact bass, you have passed by many that would be much better and give you your own sound..
it was a great learning experience, and i bet that if you took the time you just spent making that useless post instead of actually reading what i'm trying to contribute to the forum here, you'd have more of a clue.
But haters gonna hate init

@Yarp: I'm not going to expand on every setting I gave every plugin, just work with a simple saw wave sound and keep distorting it little by little. I mainly used Massive for a base sound, apply small amounts of distortion, export, and used Alchemy for resampling and layering the sound.
-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:55 am
- Location: Edmonton, Alberta Canada.
Re: Skrillex, Borgore, heavily processed bass : explained!
hey man, i meant no disrespect. and i appreciate your advice, in other words, when i read over this hungover tomorrow, ill listen to what you said, and work from there haha
cheers mate
cheers mate
Swaggr wrote:sucks ass posting at the end of the page! gotten like 1 person to give feedback on this song
-
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 3:56 am
Re: Skrillex, Borgore, heavily processed bass : explained!
ogunslinger wrote:someone should compile all this information and make a book.
"Idiots guide to producing dubstep"
Unit 1.... Applying LFO to Filter Cutoff
etc
lol
LMFAO!
-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:55 am
- Location: Edmonton, Alberta Canada.
Re: Skrillex, Borgore, heavily processed bass : explained!
guys , im also onto that shambalha style excision shit !
check this out, ill let you know how to do it if your interested !!
Soundcloud

check this out, ill let you know how to do it if your interested !!
Soundcloud



Swaggr wrote:sucks ass posting at the end of the page! gotten like 1 person to give feedback on this song
Re: Skrillex, Borgore, heavily processed bass : explained!
Anything for Albino? I'm just seeing alot of Massive or Reason stuff... 

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests