If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?

debate, appreciation, interviews, reviews (events or releases), videos, radio shows
User avatar
fractal
Mako
Posts: 12133
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:58 pm
Location: emerald city, cascadia

Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?

Post by fractal » Mon Jul 11, 2011 4:54 pm

^nail on head. Percussion is 1/2 of the equation, at least! How boring is a few hours of the exact same beat?
sub.wise:.
slow down
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum

Akira
Posts: 58
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 5:06 pm

Re: If there is no subbass then it is not dubstep?

Post by Akira » Mon Jul 11, 2011 9:28 pm

I dont think people would hate it on as much if it didnt sound so out there and was sort of more listenable and not pushing the extremes of bass synthesis and also if it wasnt such a one trick pony. what was great before was that you had deep subby tunes but you also had wobblers, like i remeber lovin oskilatah by skream when it came out i didnt few it as an excessive wobble because it was done well, same with coki and spongebob, but now youve got all these people just basically copyin that simple format time and time again.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests