Nature = God's Existence???

Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.

Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
Locked
User avatar
jrisreal
Posts: 4312
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 6:48 am
Location: the TARDIS

Re: Nature = God's Existence???

Post by jrisreal » Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:29 am

@Bringer I believe that when they say '7 days', they could be meaning it in a different way, as if a 'day' being a long period of time. With this in consideration, God and the theory of the big bang do not conflict at all. Read the story in genesis with this viewpoint and see what you can gather from it.

There are some other parts of the universe taken into consideration, too. These include the sun, the stars, the moon. There was a video I once watched that explained this crazy info about the universe linked to genesis in the Bible, if I find it, I'll let you know.

Did the tora say that the earth is 2000 years old? or that dinosaurs are a trick? I don't recall ever hearing of that or reading it.
The 13.68 billion years before were probably the same span of time that the 7 'days' are referring to.

I don't have much to say on that last statement other than that the ideas presented by those people do not reflect upon the views of jrisreal ;-)
...in my opinion
Image
ImageImageImage

User avatar
jrisreal
Posts: 4312
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 6:48 am
Location: the TARDIS

Re: Nature = God's Existence???

Post by jrisreal » Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:30 am

Bringer wrote:I see you are from Nauru, Hmm, it seems the overwhelming majority are christian.
lolwhut what does that even mean?
...in my opinion
Image
ImageImageImage

User avatar
youthful_implants
Posts: 537
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:42 am
Location: wheel up the tune fast like ramadan

Re: Nature = God's Existence???

Post by youthful_implants » Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:33 am

I think its time for...




Image
720bass.com | Strontium | Future Perfect

FACEBOOK
SOUNDCLOUD
TWITTER
TUMBLR

User avatar
Ricky_Spanish
Posts: 288
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 2:37 pm
Location: Gtr. Manchester

Re: Nature = God's Existence???

Post by Ricky_Spanish » Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:34 am

noam wrote:
Bringer wrote: I'm talking religon.Not mathematics or philosophy or anything else. So your entire post is directed at your own misapprehension.

I meant that all the western/mid eastern religions were written with old human paradigms.

The greeks belived GODS lived on Mars. An 8yr old knows that is not true.

Genesis, the garden of eden? God made the earth in 7 days. Notice how they did'nt mention the rest of the universe, perhaps because the person who wrote it never new about cosmology.

Tora - The earth is 2000 years old? Dinosours are a trick?
What about the 13.68 billion years before.

The Christians hung people who thought that the earth was not the centre of the universe. The same organisation who wrote the book you belive so dutifully.
you think i misunderstood you??

wow... i think we got off on the wrong foot there, you must be new??

Hi im Smart, you're Dumb, nice to meet you :4:

YOU SAID:' the foundations of modern life were laid millenia ago

we still study the philosophy of ancient greeks etc. not because its necessary but because it can still teach us about our world when we dont know better

dont forget, when we're born we know nothing, everything that has been learned before us and passed down is what we then learn, it isn't fair to say that they knew nothing, its a fallacy to think people of old were stupid'



I SAID: that people 1000's of years in the past Europeans or Mid east Asians simply did not have the cosmolgical perspective to create religions that dont seem ridiculous after a few centuries.

I didn't say that Archimedes or Euclid were stupid.

Hence: you misunderstood.

YOU SAID: 'Hi im Smart, you're Dumb, nice to meet you.'

I don't feel the need to respond to that. I guess I'm not as insecure as you.

noam
Posts: 10825
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:10 pm
Location: Manchester/Leeds

Re: Nature = God's Existence???

Post by noam » Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:34 am

jrisreal wrote:@Bringer I believe that when they say '7 days', they could be meaning it in a different way, as if a 'day' being a long period of time. With this in consideration, God and the theory of the big bang do not conflict at all. Read the story in genesis with this viewpoint and see what you can gather from it.

There are some other parts of the universe taken into consideration, too. These include the sun, the stars, the moon. There was a video I once watched that explained this crazy info about the universe linked to genesis in the Bible, if I find it, I'll let you know.

Did the tora say that the earth is 2000 years old? or that dinosaurs are a trick? I don't recall ever hearing of that or reading it.
The 13.68 billion years before were probably the same span of time that the 7 'days' are referring to.

I don't have much to say on that last statement other than that the ideas presented by those people do not reflect upon the views of jrisreal ;-)
you just went up in my estimations

there's one thing i hate more than a dumb religious zealot and its a dumb atheist

religion offers choices about beliefs and life, people abuse it and its power over others, like many other things in life

i believe there's a lot more to religious texts than a straight up story which bringer describes

also, that statement about ancient people not knowing anything about Cosmology is one of the jokest things i've read, the Ancients invented Cosmology - why do you think we have a fucking calendar

also
Bringer wrote:
YOU SAID: 'Hi im Smart, you're Dumb, nice to meet you.'

I don't feel the need to respond to that. I guess I'm not as insecure as you.
is anyone else... anyone...??

really?

there's so much to work with here, but im gona let you sit on this a while
Last edited by noam on Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:37 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
youthful_implants
Posts: 537
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:42 am
Location: wheel up the tune fast like ramadan

Re: Nature = God's Existence???

Post by youthful_implants » Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:35 am

and also

Image
720bass.com | Strontium | Future Perfect

FACEBOOK
SOUNDCLOUD
TWITTER
TUMBLR

User avatar
Ricky_Spanish
Posts: 288
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 2:37 pm
Location: Gtr. Manchester

Re: Nature = God's Existence???

Post by Ricky_Spanish » Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:53 am

IDIOT said: also, that statement about ancient people not knowing anything about Cosmology is one of the jokest things i've read, the Ancients invented Cosmology - why do you think we have a fucking calendar

I didn't say they knew nothing (maybe you should learn to digest information properly, i've got better things to do)

It is no coincidence that christianity changes the viewpoint on various things as physisists and cosmologists reveal more and more about nature.

fkin deluded noobs Stop wasting my time.

Phigure
Posts: 14134
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 5:55 am
Contact:

Re: Nature = God's Existence???

Post by Phigure » Fri Aug 26, 2011 4:04 am



nature is fucking retarded.
j_j wrote:^lol
Soundcloud | Twitter

User avatar
jrisreal
Posts: 4312
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 6:48 am
Location: the TARDIS

Re: Nature = God's Existence???

Post by jrisreal » Fri Aug 26, 2011 4:04 am

Guys calm down, I don't think that we need to resort to calling eachother idiots or anything...relax, chill out. :w:

and @Youthful Implants
:lebowski:
...in my opinion
Image
ImageImageImage

User avatar
youthful_implants
Posts: 537
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:42 am
Location: wheel up the tune fast like ramadan

Re: Nature = God's Existence???

Post by youthful_implants » Fri Aug 26, 2011 4:06 am

^^ zactly. lets all calm the fuck down.

I didn't have much to add but then when I thought about it, the ancient greeks had a pretty good thing going on. Big affluent empire with simple but civilised way of life. Doesn't sound too bad TBH.
720bass.com | Strontium | Future Perfect

FACEBOOK
SOUNDCLOUD
TWITTER
TUMBLR

noam
Posts: 10825
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:10 pm
Location: Manchester/Leeds

Re: Nature = God's Existence???

Post by noam » Fri Aug 26, 2011 4:14 am

Bringer wrote:IDIOT said: also, that statement about ancient people not knowing anything about Cosmology is one of the jokest things i've read, the Ancients invented Cosmology - why do you think we have a fucking calendar

I didn't say they knew nothing (maybe you should learn to digest information properly, i've got better things to do)

It is no coincidence that christianity changes the viewpoint on various things as physisists and cosmologists reveal more and more about nature.

fkin deluded noobs Stop wasting my time.
ahhahahah 'noobs'

you're like what? 15??

ahahahaha

User avatar
Ricky_Spanish
Posts: 288
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 2:37 pm
Location: Gtr. Manchester

Re: Nature = God's Existence???

Post by Ricky_Spanish » Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:05 am

wrote:IDIOT or (noam) said: also, that statement about ancient people not knowing anything about Cosmology is one of the jokest things i've read, the Ancients invented Cosmology - why do you think we have a fucking calendar.
Who do you mean when you say 'Ancients'?

I'm talking about a specific group of people:
http://www.religioustolerance.org/cosmo_bibl2.htmThe traditional explanation is that the Five Books of Moses were written by Moses himself. There are several variants of this explanation:

•Traditional Judaism and fundamentalist Christianity believe that the text was dictated by God to Moses on Mount
Sinai, letter for letter (or pretty much letter for letter).
•Other religious groups still ascribe authorship to Moses, but use words like "divinely inspired" rather than "dictated
letter for letter."
•Still others say Moses was the sole author, but there's nothing "divine" about it except in the sense that all great
works of literature and poetry are "inspired."
So we can assume god didnt dictate it word for word, given it's many inconsistencies. Well it was written by Hebrews most probably (2500-3200) years ago. These are the people I'm talking about. You see? A very specific group of people. Look up the word specific. I'm surprised you are not aware of this concept (since you are so 'smart' as you put it).

now take a look at this:
Image

This is their cosmological understanding at the time. So my point is that it is very obvious that the bible was written with a great lack of knowlege due to the fact that collective human knowledge increases with time, 2500 years is a very long time in human scales. If they knew that:

The universe contained 100-200 billion galaxies, that this may be 1 of many or infinite universes, that matter is not dead, that consciousness has consequence at the most fundamental levels ie: quantum particles, that quantum particles are in fact waves or probabilites in a linear vector space that react to consciousness, that we are all connected at the fundamental level via quantum entaglement, and many, many other things that can cause a massive paradigm shift of thinking.

(Dont take my word for it, read some books)

My point being that they would'nt said all that stupid stuff, like: talking snake, Noah. (see Rick Gervais Stand-up), Creationism. (ie: Darwinismn is false), there's loads of this stuff, You shall not covet your neighbour’s house; you shall not covet your neighbour’s wife, or male or female slave(its ok to have slaves), or ox, or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbour, the list is long! The underlined really makes my point, It is so obviously related to that time in history, it's like flared trousers and flowerpower x 2000, My other point was that by subscribing to this way of thinking you are anchoring your spirituality to 2500 in the past.

homosexuality - Homosexuality is an illicit lust forbidden by God. He said to His people Israel, "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination" (Leviticus 18:22). "If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them" (Leviticus 20:13). In these passages homosexuality is condemned as a prime example of sin, a sexual perversion. The Christian can neither alter God's viewpoint nor depart from it.

So if you're going to argue with me then make a RELEVANT point about what I am saying.

ps I guess it is only fair to let you try and disparage my own beliefs, after I have had a go at yours.

I believe that 'god' is a fundamental consciousness. And that this consciousness created the universe(s?) in order to accumulate the knowledge of countless billions of conscious beings. How else would such a being know what death felt like or what fear was or finiteness? I dont know much about god really besides that, I'm strong enough simply to hope that I will live on in some way. I dont know if death is final, I dont need to be told that I will go to heaven, I dont presume to know the mind of god. Nobody has to die for my beliefs. I dont need a commandment to tell me what things are wrong.

User avatar
cityzen
Posts: 4384
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 7:33 pm

Re: Nature = God's Existence???

Post by cityzen » Fri Aug 26, 2011 9:28 am

^^This guy is going to go far. Welcome to the forum. :t:

Noam: Why is my sig wrong?
BLAHBLAHJAH wrote:... If you're ever in a burning building and you see smoke and smell fire, maybe it's worth getting
out...

User avatar
mIrReN
Posts: 5611
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:22 pm
Location: Belgium, Bruges

Re: Nature = God's Existence???

Post by mIrReN » Fri Aug 26, 2011 9:49 am

whahaha I've stopped reading this crap

but pls continue the picks, make me chuckle :cornlol: :corndance:
"If your chest ain't rattlin it ain't happenin'" - DJ Pinch
"Move pples bodies and stimulate their minds"
we just ride the wave
Life sucks; Get used² it.

big up your mum

noam
Posts: 10825
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:10 pm
Location: Manchester/Leeds

Re: Nature = God's Existence???

Post by noam » Fri Aug 26, 2011 12:03 pm

cityzen wrote:^^This guy is going to go far. Welcome to the forum. :t:

Noam: Why is my sig wrong?
my favourite bit is how he still believes i believe in the holy bible

re: your sig: i duno, something like direct experience seems to suggest something entirely empirical, and more so - physical/material. Im not sure if this is what you're referring to, but if it is that what i have the problem with. However, i do know that you're a bit of a Buddhist and 'true knowledge' may refer to something different than say, Ayers' justified, true, belief which is a widely known (although now, slightly less credible) description of 'knowledge'

before i go further, you should let us know if im building some sort of straw-man here

User avatar
magma
Posts: 18810
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Re: Nature = God's Existence???

Post by magma » Fri Aug 26, 2011 12:09 pm

noam wrote:
cityzen wrote:^^This guy is going to go far. Welcome to the forum. :t:

Noam: Why is my sig wrong?
my favourite bit is how he still believes i believe in the holy bible
Rule #1 of the fighty, Dawkinsesque atheist - if you defend theism, you MUST be a theist. I think Alien Pimp thinks I'm Christian, too. :lol:

It's that sort of failure of critical thinking that leads me to believe they might not the best people to engage with or listen to... they're just attack dogs who have found a new faith to defend.
Meus equus tuo altior est

"Let me eat when I'm hungry, let me drink when I'm dry.
Give me dollars when I'm hard up, religion when I die."
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.

noam
Posts: 10825
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:10 pm
Location: Manchester/Leeds

Re: Nature = God's Existence???

Post by noam » Fri Aug 26, 2011 12:16 pm

magma wrote:
noam wrote:
cityzen wrote:^^This guy is going to go far. Welcome to the forum. :t:

Noam: Why is my sig wrong?
my favourite bit is how he still believes i believe in the holy bible
Rule #1 of the fighty, Dawkinsesque atheist - if you defend theism, you MUST be a theist. I think Alien Pimp thinks I'm Christian, too. :lol:

It's that sort of failure of critical thinking that leads me to believe they might not the best people to engage with or listen to... they're just attack dogs who have found a new faith to defend.
yeh but he's still stumbling on the ropes from my left-straight of wisdom and right-hook of humour so its fun to play

User avatar
Ricky_Spanish
Posts: 288
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 2:37 pm
Location: Gtr. Manchester

Re: Nature = God's Existence???

Post by Ricky_Spanish » Fri Aug 26, 2011 12:24 pm

Im agnostic, that is considerably different from athest. I did actually realise you are not an theist. I meant to all can disparage.

If you can make stumble I would be surprised. As far as I can tell, you have no point. And you're the one who started throwing insults around.

User avatar
cityzen
Posts: 4384
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 7:33 pm

Re: Nature = God's Existence???

Post by cityzen » Fri Aug 26, 2011 12:47 pm

noam wrote:
cityzen wrote: Noam: Why is my sig wrong?
re: your sig: i duno, something like direct experience seems to suggest something entirely empirical, and more so - physical/material.
Pretty much this, however, if we're talking about knowledge of a theory then (imo) direct experience is nothing more than reading about it or hearing it.
It just means that 1000 people could tell you that the grass is green, but without seeing it for yourself you don't know the grass is green.
I have come to respect your opinion, if you can pick holes in my sig I will remove it.
BLAHBLAHJAH wrote:... If you're ever in a burning building and you see smoke and smell fire, maybe it's worth getting
out...

User avatar
d-T-r
Posts: 2856
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 7:09 pm
Location: syntax
Contact:

Re: Nature = God's Existence???

Post by d-T-r » Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:09 pm

cityzen wrote:
noam wrote:
cityzen wrote: Noam: Why is my sig wrong?
re: your sig: i duno, something like direct experience seems to suggest something entirely empirical, and more so - physical/material.
Pretty much this, however, if we're talking about knowledge of a theory then (imo) direct experience is nothing more than reading about it or hearing it.
It just means that 1000 people could tell you that the grass is green, but without seeing it for yourself you don't know the grass is green.
I have come to respect your opinion, if you can pick holes in my sig I will remove it.
just happened to come across a post on another forum on an unrelated topic but knew it would be relevant in response to this. just searched and it's from wiki.
"Gnosis is used throughout Greek philosophy as a technical term for experience knowledge in contrast to theoretical knowledge or epistemology. The term is also related to the study of knowledge retention or memory (cognition). In relation to ontic or ontological, which is how something actually is rather than how something is captured (abstraction) and stored (memory) in the mind."
Ontology + epistemology ... nice words :)
Soundcloud

Tumblrrr Etsyyy
_ __ ___ _ __ ___ _ __ ___ _ __ ___ _ __

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests