epochalypso wrote:^You're a tool. Coki said himself he doesn't go out of his way to write amazing pieces of music, he writes dubplates. Dubplates that he cuts to play on big fucking systems to wreck the dance. And they end up getting released because people love them.
It's not "rimming", a lot of people genuinely enjoy his music, and this being dubstepforum, a lot of those people post on here. Is that such a difficult concept?
You're complaining about people bigging up a producer on a forum? You're a dickhead mate.
If you don't like it, jog on.
Cornbread, you're a douche and maybe one day you'll realize it.Cornbreadddd wrote:You are so,fucking, stupid. Not even talking about Coki man, typically people read words. Words form sentences, sentences form complete thoughts, and then collectively this whole structure enables humans to communicate.. Above I utilized this apparently incredibly difficult concept (for people such as yourself) to express my feelings
You act all snooty and intelligent, and then you just pull nonsense out of your ass like these nuggets of wisdom:
Like pulkpull said, Disko Rekah wasn't innovating in any way. Sick tune, don't get me wrong, but I can totally understand why Loefah wasn't happy with it, because it's a pretty standard dubstep tune of the times. How can you even say it was ground breaking when you weren't even into the music in 07? There's nothing wrong with being a little late to the party but don't act like an expert ffsCornbreadddd wrote:Disko Rekah was ground-breaking for sure, Mud, Ruffage too. The man has tunes, but I feel like some people straight up idolize the guy on this forum.
Maybe you should read the quote in my sig... if Mala is just like Loefah in that regard, does that mean he's no longer your king lolololKinda feel that he has this way of making his tunes seem godly just by never releasing any of them. Mala will always be the king.
Man, if you had even an inkling of a clue of what it's really all about, you wouldn't be saying this. The fact that you think it simply boils down to "location". Just goes to show that you've never really had a true experience, because it's such a radically different thing than sitting at home and listening to it. There's really no way to explain it. The music takes on a completely different form... part of it is a shift from listening -> feeling, but it's so much more complex than that. Like Raad said, it's all about context... The context, the vibe, the system, the people, the emotion, everything plays together in a beautiful way to produce something very unique. It's really an amazing phenomenon - at the risk of sounding a bit preachy and pretentious. One day you might finally get to experience it yourself, and it'll click in your head, and you'll realize what we're talking about. Then again, maybe you will never get it. That's alright too, you're a different type of person, but maybe you should look into a different genre of music then, because this idea is central to the genre IMO.Cornbreadddd wrote:This is a total cop-out. Good music is good music and shouldn't be relative to location. Just because you're out around other people in a building that isn't your house, doesn't mean the music has to be crazy and that you can't vibe out on something less chaotic. A party atmosphere doesn't always have to be an aggressive atmosphere.
"Good" music isn't objective like you're trying to argue it is. Sort of like how there's music to listen to when you're drifting off to sleep vs. music you're going to listen to when you're at a party... There's music for listening to at home, and music meant to be listened to on a system.