fuck yeah ... we can have sexism, racism and homophobismwormcode wrote:don't have to limit ourselves to just 1 ism.
Justifying fun
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.
Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.
Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
Re: Justifying fun
Re: Justifying fun
Yeah, I consider myself more of an anarchist than anything, but I usually just say libertarian socialist to like family and stuff....sounds less provocative. And my parents think anarchists are terrorists so yeah. Ik it's not anarchist, but I support SPUSA because they're anti capitalist and I have more in common with them than any other party. Torn though between Stewart Alexander and Jill Stein. Not that it really matters, but I'd like to vote for one of them.wormcode wrote:Haha
Well I don't consider myself communist, I'm more into anarchism - specifically social anarchism, with some hints of syndicalism as I'm not against people's choice to work if they want (as in not just to pay off debt or increase GDP). I just think it would be best to work with and for the benefit of everyone as a whole. Again ideal utopias etc...
I think each ideology has its good features and we can learn and borrow from most of them, don't have to limit ourselves to just 1 ism.
It's all about Kropotkin
Sorry for that rambling, off topic post.
ultraspatial wrote:doing any sort of drug other than smoking crack is 5 panel.
incnic wrote:true headz tread a fine line between bitterness and euphoria - much like the best rave tunes
Re: Justifying fun
You left out where I said from most of them. Obviously not including thosetyger wrote:fuck yeah ... we can have sexism, racism and homophobismwormcode wrote:don't have to limit ourselves to just 1 ism.
And yeah SCope13 I agree, I like Stewart Alexander's ideals but realistically no one has ever heard of those people, or most independent/3rd party candidates which is sad. Lots of people don't even really know it goes past Dem/Repub.
- dubfordessert
- Posts: 3191
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:07 pm
Re: Justifying fun
imo communist isn't an inaccurate description for any left anarchist
only issue is anarchism tends to be an ahistorical ethical position, whereas marxism is actually a tool for critical analysis. the issue is with marxism as a grand narrative, which is why i wouldn't say i was a marxist either, but there is loads of heterodox marxism where that isn't the case i dont think
only issue is anarchism tends to be an ahistorical ethical position, whereas marxism is actually a tool for critical analysis. the issue is with marxism as a grand narrative, which is why i wouldn't say i was a marxist either, but there is loads of heterodox marxism where that isn't the case i dont think
AxeD wrote:post your awful taste in music you assholes
wobbles wrote::3
Re: Justifying fun
OP, just say this to your dad and he will leave you to play your video games in peace.dubfordessert wrote:imo communist isn't an inaccurate description for any left anarchist
only issue is anarchism tends to be an ahistorical ethical position, whereas marxism is actually a tool for critical analysis. the issue is with marxism as a grand narrative, which is why i wouldn't say i was a marxist either, but there is loads of heterodox marxism where that isn't the case i dont think
- dubfordessert
- Posts: 3191
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:07 pm
Re: Justifying fun
oops i meant *is not isn't 
AxeD wrote:post your awful taste in music you assholes
wobbles wrote::3
Re: Justifying fun
anarchism and communism attempt to achieve the same society, they just have different strategies for getting there.dubfordessert wrote:imo communist isn't an inaccurate description for any left anarchist
only issue is anarchism tends to be an ahistorical ethical position, whereas marxism is actually a tool for critical analysis. the issue is with marxism as a grand narrative, which is why i wouldn't say i was a marxist either, but there is loads of heterodox marxism where that isn't the case i dont think
ultraspatial wrote:doing any sort of drug other than smoking crack is 5 panel.
incnic wrote:true headz tread a fine line between bitterness and euphoria - much like the best rave tunes
- dubfordessert
- Posts: 3191
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:07 pm
Re: Justifying fun
there are an absolute multitude of strategies within and between both. i don't think it's v useful to talk about*those* words as mutually exclusive particularities. wherein they differ, imo, is the theory, and the philosophy, rather than strategy (which is different itself from practice). they've informed and worked with each other, but marxist theory informs anarchism moreso than anything, i would say. i think a lot of anarchists are more action-oriented than anything also.SCope13 wrote:anarchism and communism attempt to achieve the same society, they just have different strategies for getting there.dubfordessert wrote:imo communist isn't an inaccurate description for any left anarchist
only issue is anarchism tends to be an ahistorical ethical position, whereas marxism is actually a tool for critical analysis. the issue is with marxism as a grand narrative, which is why i wouldn't say i was a marxist either, but there is loads of heterodox marxism where that isn't the case i dont think
also i actually did mean isn't, it says inaccurate. nice double negative ffs.
AxeD wrote:post your awful taste in music you assholes
wobbles wrote::3
Re: Justifying fun
just trolling ... disappointed nobody complained that "homophobism" isn't a word ...wormcode wrote:You left out where I said from most of them. Obviously not including thosetyger wrote:fuck yeah ... we can have sexism, racism and homophobismwormcode wrote:don't have to limit ourselves to just 1 ism.
anarchism is perhaps most generally an attitude towards power ... regarding state power with the same kind of suspicion and distaste as one would any other use of force ... instead of, as most political theorists would, regarding certain kinds of state as legitimate, and giving them a kind of moral "free pass" ...
proudhon's version of anarchism looks more like an alternative to communism ... communism aims at joint ownership of the means of production, proudhon wants nobody to own the means of production (and for there to be no landlords) so that the everything that is produced will belong to the workers who've produced it ...
Re: Justifying fun
There are a lot of similarities yeah. That and to expand on the Proudhon bit, being against ideas of private property in regards to land ownership, but generally accepting personal property in regards to every day possessions. Like: okay, you don't want someone to use your toothbrush, fair play. But you're going to own this overpriced building with 100 rooms that have been empty for a year? That's a total waste. It's much more community based with ties to mutualism (social anarchism anyway, which is what I meant). There is also more right-leaning anarchism that a lot of those tea party people would fit in with, but is pretty polar opposite in most things.
Also I've actually seen 'homophobism' used as a word online a lot, it might be one of those pesky Americanisms.
Also I've actually seen 'homophobism' used as a word online a lot, it might be one of those pesky Americanisms.
- Electric_Head
- Posts: 16958
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 9:59 am
- Location: South of Africa
- Contact:
-
idontreallygiveashit
- Posts: 3860
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:45 pm
- Location: Birmingham
Re: Justifying fun
go back to germanyElectric_Head wrote:This thread has devolved horribly.
- Electric_Head
- Posts: 16958
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 9:59 am
- Location: South of Africa
- Contact:
Re: Justifying fun
Bottom right, cool dudeElectric_Head wrote:2 hands bro
Soundcloud
♫•*¨*•.¸¸ This is a special Proper HQ Recording by myself !!! ¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪*
Re: Justifying fun
Hitler. Are we done here?
- Electric_Head
- Posts: 16958
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 9:59 am
- Location: South of Africa
- Contact:
Re: Justifying fun
wtf is that symbol? It's like a 3 armed schwasticker.Electric_Head wrote:2 hands bro
- Electric_Head
- Posts: 16958
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 9:59 am
- Location: South of Africa
- Contact:
Re: Justifying fun
http://awb.co.za/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afrikaner_ ... dsbeweging
'The AWB flag is composed of three black sevens (forming a triskelion) in a white circle upon a red background. According to AWB, the sevens, 'the number of JAHWEH', 'stand to oppose the number 666, the number of the anti-Christ'. Red is considered to represent Jesus' blood, while black stands for bravery and courage. The inner white circle symbolises the "eternal struggle", or according to other sources "eternal life". '
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afrikaner_ ... dsbeweging
'The AWB flag is composed of three black sevens (forming a triskelion) in a white circle upon a red background. According to AWB, the sevens, 'the number of JAHWEH', 'stand to oppose the number 666, the number of the anti-Christ'. Red is considered to represent Jesus' blood, while black stands for bravery and courage. The inner white circle symbolises the "eternal struggle", or according to other sources "eternal life". '



- Sexual_Chocolate
- Posts: 17019
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:57 pm
- Location: Label A City
Re: Justifying fun
Eugène Terre'Blanche aye....
i knew that symbol looked familiar.
i knew that symbol looked familiar.
SoundcloudLaszlo wrote:and yay, upon imparting his knowledge to his fellow Ninjas, Nevalo spoke wisely that when aggrieved by a woman thou shalt put it in her bum.
https://labelarecs.bandcamp.com
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

