

: S you sound like you have no idea about the internetmagma wrote:Sounds just great.Phase Down wrote:and new ones would take its placeNevalo wrote:a lot of major websites would dissapear.Phase Down wrote:no it wouldnt.. lolMarcus wrote:If advertisement was banned most of the internet would die off.
Genevieve wrote:It's a universal law that the rich have to exploit the poor. Preferably violently.
Avalanche wrote:People saying Skrillex IS dubstep i.e - he made it etc.
Don't get me wrong I like Skrillex, but alot of people don't just because he's the face of a genre he doesn't really make. And that's stupid: "Don't hate the player, Hate the fans" ( I know it's game but whatever, it wouldnt really make sense that way.)
Yeah, I only spent 10 years of my life running gaming websites for profit through advertising that would've never been created if I couldn't have paid for their traffic somehow as a 14 year old. Advertising allowed me to make more money with more traffic, so no matter how much traffic I got I could always pay the bill. Remarkably appropriate.Phase Down wrote:: S you sound like you have no idea about the internetmagma wrote:Sounds just great.Phase Down wrote:and new ones would take its placeNevalo wrote:a lot of major websites would dissapear.Phase Down wrote: no it wouldnt.. lol
Yeah, I agree with all of this entirely. I had to go back and edit after I said we might not have had Sopranos without TV advertising and I realised that I was being a short-sighted dickhead. We might've all had 100s of hours more stimulating conversation per year for the last decade if we'd accidentally avoided this 2nd golden age of the Idiot Box.Laszlo wrote:@Magma - Yeah, I retract the internet aspect of my original proposal - it wasn't really what I had in mind when I first posted but as an afterthought I just tacked it on because I do find them annoying.
As for the TV part of it - I genuinely think we'd gain more joy from sitting and talking to each other in the evenings than watching an episode or two of The Wire.
As I said (or maybe didn't. Can't remember if I edited my post) the idea is a long-term one for the benefit of future generations and humanity as a whole.
nowaysj wrote:I wholeheartedly believe that Michael Brown's mother and father killed him.
Genevieve wrote:It's a universal law that the rich have to exploit the poor. Preferably violently.
as soon as I had posted my comment I was really hoping you wouldnt pick on thatLaszlo wrote:I know. I couldn't take you seriously seeing as you're advertising yourself as a wanker![]()
![]()
butter_man wrote: who do you think taught you smoke tree's, OD'S, Ice cubes and DOC's?
God, thats who.
one less car u fatsoNevalo wrote:yes. would ban cyclists on roads.
get back on the footpath you lycra wearing fucks.
okay angry wrestler, you're getting a little defensive here.. if you think that without advertisements only government websites will run you have been blinded by your own "profession" just a little bit... you're right though that gaming websites are pretty much advertisement ran.. so i applaud you on thatmagma wrote: Yeah, I only spent 10 years of my life running gaming websites for profit through advertising that would've never been created if I couldn't have paid for their traffic somehow as a 14 year old. Advertising allowed me to make more money with more traffic, so no matter how much traffic I got I could always pay the bill. Remarkably appropriate.
I guess we should only let kids whose parents can bankroll them or have applied to government schemes to get ideas approved for funding make any kind of mark on the Internet though.
You're right, I don't know jackshit about this.![]()
![]()
sd5 wrote:owning land
ultraspatial wrote:doing any sort of drug other than smoking crack is 5 panel.
incnic wrote:true headz tread a fine line between bitterness and euphoria - much like the best rave tunes
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests