IF YOU HAD TO SPLIT DUBSTEP INTO TWO CATEGORIES............

debate, appreciation, interviews, reviews (events or releases), videos, radio shows
epithet
Permanent Vacation
Posts: 713
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 11:29 pm

Post by epithet » Tue Apr 15, 2008 11:40 pm

Hatcha wrote:if any 1 decides 2 change it'it will b us guys that named it
I doubt if y'all could rename it even if ya tried. The horse has well and truly bolted. If kode9 cant get any traction with hyperdub as a genre name no scene originators is gonna be able to either i reckon.

Actually maybe oris jay could if he convinved the non croydon lot to branch off :D

User avatar
lukesnarl
Posts: 117
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 5:33 am
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by lukesnarl » Wed Apr 16, 2008 12:07 am

badger wrote:
lukesnarl wrote:And just by the by if dubstep were to be split, it would have to be along the Ham and non-Ham lines....
YES! Image

i can't believe no one has mentioned this before
Yes, I know. Seems the obvious choice to me....
===================
Sub Bass Snarl sound system
Sydney, Australia
---------------------
Paradigm Shift - weekly radioshow
on 2SER FM (107.3 sydney)
streaming on http://www.2ser.com
7:30pm-9pm monday (GMT+10)
playlists: http://www.cyclicdefrost.com/radio
======================
http://www.myspace.com/lukesnarl
======================

User avatar
stenchman
Posts: 1184
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 11:56 pm
Location: Dutty Dover

Post by stenchman » Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:29 am

ozols man wrote:
sigha wrote:I dont think Stenchman was talking about splitting the scene as such...
just that some tunes clearly have a dark vibe...some tunes clearly have a light vibe, and i think he was wondering what tunes you would say fall into that magical ethreal 'in-between' territory.

I listen to alot of music, and would definately agree with the 'good/shit theory' and enjoy the variety of influences you can hear in Dubstep. Inspite of this, I reckon its unrealistic to expect people not to catagorise certain sounds into sub-genres... like it or not, its a natural evolution with any music.
OH YEH ALSO STENCHMAN IS STENCHMAN. DONT LISTEN TO HIS STYLE "REMEMBER" LABELING IS FOR MONEY. LISTEN TO "STENCH MAN" U GET ME. LISTEN TO HIS FREQUENCY. THATS WHY WHEN THE TERM "CHAVS" WAS CREATED BY THE MEDIA I DECIDED TO NEVER SAY IT BECAUSE ITS USED TO PERSECUTE THOSE OF THE GHETTO, WHETHER THEY BE WHITE, BLACK, ASIAN ETC ETC
uh?

User avatar
fractal
Mako
Posts: 12133
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:58 pm
Location: emerald city, cascadia

Post by fractal » Thu Apr 17, 2008 10:48 am

Stenchman wrote:
ozols man wrote:
sigha wrote:I dont think Stenchman was talking about splitting the scene as such...
just that some tunes clearly have a dark vibe...some tunes clearly have a light vibe, and i think he was wondering what tunes you would say fall into that magical ethreal 'in-between' territory.

I listen to alot of music, and would definately agree with the 'good/shit theory' and enjoy the variety of influences you can hear in Dubstep. Inspite of this, I reckon its unrealistic to expect people not to catagorise certain sounds into sub-genres... like it or not, its a natural evolution with any music.
OH YEH ALSO STENCHMAN IS STENCHMAN. DONT LISTEN TO HIS STYLE "REMEMBER" LABELING IS FOR MONEY. LISTEN TO "STENCH MAN" U GET ME. LISTEN TO HIS FREQUENCY. THATS WHY WHEN THE TERM "CHAVS" WAS CREATED BY THE MEDIA I DECIDED TO NEVER SAY IT BECAUSE ITS USED TO PERSECUTE THOSE OF THE GHETTO, WHETHER THEY BE WHITE, BLACK, ASIAN ETC ETC
uh?
:lol:
sub.wise:.
slow down
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests