The Truth about Fruity Loops Topic

hardware, software, tips and tricks
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.

Quick Link to Feedback Forum
pk-
Posts: 4367
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:53 pm
Location: SE15
Contact:

Post by pk- » Mon Feb 16, 2009 5:48 pm

I really like Fruity's drum-machine approach to making drum patterns, it looks far too fiddly in things like cubase or logic. Like someone else in this thread it was the first thing I used after ReBirth and it made a lot of sense.

Plus the whole pattern system seems to be a far more organised way of making things; my housemate does all his stuff in Nuendo and it looks a fucking mess, I've got no idea how you could know where you are in the tune or where a particular fill or stab or whatever is

I have no idea what words like mixdowns, automation clips, lanes, bouncing or mastering mean though, so maybe it's a case of ignorance being bliss.

User avatar
pdomino
Posts: 5643
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 2:54 pm

Post by pdomino » Thu Feb 19, 2009 4:07 pm

Love Fruityloops for quick build, dont like it for big audio, chopping etc

Purchase it, well worth it, no lost dubs :)

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests