
gain structure and mixing aka THE MONEYSHOT THREAD
Forum rules
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
By using this "Production" sub-forum, you acknowledge that you have read, understood and agreed with our terms of use for this site. Click HERE to read them. If you do not agree to our terms of use, you must exit this site immediately. We do not accept any responsibility for the content, submissions, information or links contained herein. Users posting content here, do so completely at their own risk.
Quick Link to Feedback Forum
-
- Posts: 1737
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
- Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
- Contact:
Re: gain structure and mixing aka THE MONEYSHOT THREAD
^ Jeebus, I'm retiring. How nicely put.


www.scmastering.com / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com
Re: gain structure and mixing aka THE MONEYSHOT THREAD
You have taught us well, Obi-Bob.
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 1:52 pm
- Location: Toronto
Re: gain structure and mixing aka THE MONEYSHOT THREAD
if anyone is still confused i think its easier to do this math using decimals or fractions like belowmrlithium wrote:The math following is correct now. With decibels:
-6 + -6 = 0
-12 + -12 = -6
so
-6 + -12 + -12 = 0
-12 + -9 + -9 = 0
-9 + -9 = -3
so
-12 + -3 = 0
I believe thats what you wanted to say.
going deeper down, all keeping master @ 0dB
(-18 + -18 + -18 + -18 + -18 + -18 + -18 + -18) =0dB
Thats 8 tracks each -18dB and can be broken down into
[ (-18 + -18 +-18 +-18) = -6 ] + [ (-18 + -18 +-18 +-18) = -6 ] =0dB
and
{[(-18 + -18) = -12] + [(-18 + -18) = -12] + [(-18 + -18) = -12] + [(-18 + -18) = -12] } =0dB
eg.
0db = 1 (total headroom)
-6db= (1/2) = 0.5 (half ur headroom)
-9db= (3/8) = 0.375 (three eights of ur headroom)
-12db= (1/4) =0.25 (a quarter of ur headroom)
-18db = (1/8) = 0.125 (one eighth of ur headroom)
then clearly 1 = 8 X (0.125) = 8 X (-18db)
and also 1= (1/2) + (1/2) = (-6db) + (-6db)
and so on..
thats my understanding of it, if im wrong then i apologise!
-
- Posts: 1737
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
- Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
- Contact:
Re: gain structure and mixing aka THE MONEYSHOT THREAD
While it's appreciated to an extent, this stuff isn't helping 
We're trying to simplfy the issue rather than complicate it.
I have a physics degree and a serious case of nerditude, and I have NEVER, not once, done any sort of mathematics relating to levels when building a mix.

We're trying to simplfy the issue rather than complicate it.
I have a physics degree and a serious case of nerditude, and I have NEVER, not once, done any sort of mathematics relating to levels when building a mix.
www.scmastering.com / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com
Re: gain structure and mixing aka THE MONEYSHOT THREAD
@macc
if bass frequencies and kick frequencies collide, should i put the kick in the 90-190 range that im filtering out of my bass? If im completely off i will humbly take your advice on what to do
thanks in advance
edit: open to anyone to answer of course. there's many useful people in this thread
if bass frequencies and kick frequencies collide, should i put the kick in the 90-190 range that im filtering out of my bass? If im completely off i will humbly take your advice on what to do

thanks in advance
edit: open to anyone to answer of course. there's many useful people in this thread
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 1:52 pm
- Location: Toronto
Re: gain structure and mixing aka THE MONEYSHOT THREAD
i think those numbers make it easier to understand the original post cos ive been coming back to this thread for about a year trying to it figure it out and it was only yesterday that it dawned on me..macc wrote:While it's appreciated to an extent, this stuff isn't helping
We're trying to simplfy the issue rather than complicate it.
I have a physics degree and a serious case of nerditude, and I have NEVER, not once, done any sort of mathematics relating to levels when building a mix.
the numbers helped me gain an understanding of decibals (although not the main point of this thread), im not advocating mixing by numbers

and let me take this opportunity to thank you macc for this thread which is probably the most useful thread ive read on any forum anywhere
Re: gain structure and mixing aka THE MONEYSHOT THREAD
just to clarify for myself, the suggestion is that the individual channel volume faders should remain at 0dB?nowaysj wrote:Think this has been covered in this thread. REcap - keep your levels moderate through your signal path (remember itb here). Should try to keep your mixer faders at 0db for the basis of your mix. That usually means that your sound source, a sample or synth is probably around -12db. Watch your inputs and outputs in between your fx. Some fx add a lot of gain.
thanks in advance.
-
- Posts: 1737
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
- Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
- Contact:
Re: gain structure and mixing aka THE MONEYSHOT THREAD
In an ideal world, all the sounds would be at the right level and the song would essentially mix itselfroyalB wrote: just to clarify for myself, the suggestion is that the individual channel volume faders should remain at 0dB?

Think, a good band - they all play at the right level, no need to change anything.
So, yes. Get it right as early in the signal path as you can - at the recording/sampler/synth level.
www.scmastering.com / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com
Re: gain structure and mixing aka THE MONEYSHOT THREAD
Royal, I responded to your Q, but it went into the ether. But you got a response from the man himself, so s'all good. 

Re: gain structure and mixing aka THE MONEYSHOT THREAD
@nowaysj
no worries. huge thanks to both of u and to all others who have contributed to the collective knowledge within this thread :$
no worries. huge thanks to both of u and to all others who have contributed to the collective knowledge within this thread :$
- safeandsound
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 5:47 pm
- Location: London UK
- Contact:
Re: gain structure and mixing aka THE MONEYSHOT THREAD
The only problem is the second post in the thread is based on summing in phase sine waves
which is fairly rare to say the least when mixing.
This would mean fundamental components in say a kick drum and bass line would have to be at the same frequency and in phase.
Unlikely.
I would peak your kick drum/snare at -15dBFS at 24 bit resolution to be safer from reaching 0dBFS.
which is fairly rare to say the least when mixing.
This would mean fundamental components in say a kick drum and bass line would have to be at the same frequency and in phase.
Unlikely.
I would peak your kick drum/snare at -15dBFS at 24 bit resolution to be safer from reaching 0dBFS.
SafeandSound Mastering : PMC IB1S, MANLEY Massive Passive (Hardware), Summit Audio DCL-200, HCL Varis Vari Mu, Custom stereo linked 5 band mastering EQ.
.masteringmastering.co.uk/onlinemastering.html
.masteringmastering.co.uk/onlinemastering.html
-
- Posts: 1737
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
- Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
- Contact:
Re: gain structure and mixing aka THE MONEYSHOT THREAD
Which means you have headroom to spare. It's a worst case scenario, which is the best case to bear in mind when trying to avoid clipping.safeandsound wrote: This would mean fundamental components in say a kick drum and bass line would have to be at the same frequency and in phase.
Unlikely.

P.S. They don't have to be the same frequency - instantaneous peak meters don't care about frequency. if the consituent parts of a signal mean a single sample adds up to +/- 0db (or over), then it's a clip, regardless of what happened before or after ie, irrespective of frequency (of course, some/most meters allow several consecutive samples before they register, but that's beside the point).
Anyway, I do I agree that it is unlikely - but again, it's a worst case/best example thing

www.scmastering.com / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com
-
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 9:24 pm
- Location: East Coast Steppa
Re: gain structure and mixing aka THE MONEYSHOT THREAD
I have a question about listning to a mix on different speaker systems. I've asked this a few times, but i have'nt gotten a respose (i wasn't quite posting in proper threads).
Let's say i am making a track on a Crate 30W guitar amp and a subwoofer designed for sound effects in movies. Mainly explosions and other sounds that require a little rumble action. But after i finished mixing my levels i exported a WIP so i could listen to it using my ipod. The problem is that once i listened to it in my car, my sub seemed to vanish? I thought it might just be the speakers but i tried it using a few other systems and i had the same problem on 3/4 of them(not including setup in the 'studio'). The mid range bass seemed to be swallowed by my percusison as well? Which yeah, thats kind of extreme.
Brought some stuff back up to normal now, but i am really wondering how to avoid this. Do i just need some quality monitors to assure that my mix won't get messy on other systems? How do i make the mix quality more generic i guess?
Let's say i am making a track on a Crate 30W guitar amp and a subwoofer designed for sound effects in movies. Mainly explosions and other sounds that require a little rumble action. But after i finished mixing my levels i exported a WIP so i could listen to it using my ipod. The problem is that once i listened to it in my car, my sub seemed to vanish? I thought it might just be the speakers but i tried it using a few other systems and i had the same problem on 3/4 of them(not including setup in the 'studio'). The mid range bass seemed to be swallowed by my percusison as well? Which yeah, thats kind of extreme.
Brought some stuff back up to normal now, but i am really wondering how to avoid this. Do i just need some quality monitors to assure that my mix won't get messy on other systems? How do i make the mix quality more generic i guess?
Re: gain structure and mixing aka THE MONEYSHOT THREAD
try listening to other music, of similar style maybe? on your producing system, so then you know lie if one tune has bass loud enough in the car, then you need your tunes bass to be as loud as that, and other things like percussion and stuff aswell.Redderious wrote:I have a question about listning to a mix on different speaker systems. I've asked this a few times, but i have'nt gotten a respose (i wasn't quite posting in proper threads).
Let's say i am making a track on a Crate 30W guitar amp and a subwoofer designed for sound effects in movies. Mainly explosions and other sounds that require a little rumble action. But after i finished mixing my levels i exported a WIP so i could listen to it using my ipod. The problem is that once i listened to it in my car, my sub seemed to vanish? I thought it might just be the speakers but i tried it using a few other systems and i had the same problem on 3/4 of them(not including setup in the 'studio'). The mid range bass seemed to be swallowed by my percusison as well? Which yeah, thats kind of extreme.
Brought some stuff back up to normal now, but i am really wondering how to avoid this. Do i just need some quality monitors to assure that my mix won't get messy on other systems? How do i make the mix quality more generic i guess?
OiOiii #BELTERTopManLurka wrote: thanks for confirming
-
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 9:24 pm
- Location: East Coast Steppa
Re: gain structure and mixing aka THE MONEYSHOT THREAD
That is a smart idea, i actually tried somethign similair with 'Falling' by Phaeleh. That tune has some massive bass in it. One thing i noticed though, he layers his sub so it is audible no matter what system it is played through. When using a subwoofer, the floors shake. When i play it in my car, i can still hear it perfectly. And when i listen to it using my earbuds(ipod) i can hear higher freqs that mimic the sub except sound alot more rough. Thing about that is i cant hear this hi-freq sound when i can here the sub layer.
I know a good sub isn't quite audible but you should be able to determine the tone of it to some extent.
I know a good sub isn't quite audible but you should be able to determine the tone of it to some extent.
Re: gain structure and mixing aka THE MONEYSHOT THREAD
I-pod earbuds can't reproduce low bass frequency much less sub bass. The high frequency you hear with i-pod headphones is there lousy attempt at sub bass.Redderious wrote:That is a smart idea, i actually tried somethign similair with 'Falling' by Phaeleh. That tune has some massive bass in it. One thing i noticed though, he layers his sub so it is audible no matter what system it is played through. When using a subwoofer, the floors shake. When i play it in my car, i can still hear it perfectly. And when i listen to it using my earbuds(ipod) i can hear higher freqs that mimic the sub except sound alot more rough. Thing about that is i cant hear this hi-freq sound when i can here the sub layer.
I know a good sub isn't quite audible but you should be able to determine the tone of it to some extent.

"Pants are the governments way of restricting your freedom. They are like mind control but more practical."
Re: gain structure and mixing aka THE MONEYSHOT THREAD
I-pod earbuds can't reproduce low bass frequency much less sub bass. The high frequency you hear with i-pod headphones is probably just their lousy attempt at sub bass. It could also be the rattling from where the speaker came loose I had a pare of sonys that did that to me.Redderious wrote:That is a smart idea, i actually tried somethign similair with 'Falling' by Phaeleh. That tune has some massive bass in it. One thing i noticed though, he layers his sub so it is audible no matter what system it is played through. When using a subwoofer, the floors shake. When i play it in my car, i can still hear it perfectly. And when i listen to it using my earbuds(ipod) i can hear higher freqs that mimic the sub except sound alot more rough. Thing about that is i cant hear this hi-freq sound when i can here the sub layer.
I know a good sub isn't quite audible but you should be able to determine the tone of it to some extent.

"Pants are the governments way of restricting your freedom. They are like mind control but more practical."
Re: gain structure and mixing aka THE MONEYSHOT THREAD
to make ur bassline more audible on smaller systems/systems with bad low freq response, u'll need to give an impression of bass, to fake it.. because u wont be able to make a shitty clock radio to produce 20hz...
amongst other things which im less familiar with.. u can fake the existence of bass by adding up harmonics that will lead the listener to get an impression that there is actually bass while there isnt. = distortion... certain plugins specialize in that.. while it's still possible to help the issue with any distortion plugin and a good understanding of distortion itself..
but that is way off topic...
amongst other things which im less familiar with.. u can fake the existence of bass by adding up harmonics that will lead the listener to get an impression that there is actually bass while there isnt. = distortion... certain plugins specialize in that.. while it's still possible to help the issue with any distortion plugin and a good understanding of distortion itself..
but that is way off topic...
Sharmaji wrote:2011: the year of the calloused-from-overuse facepalm
-
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 9:24 pm
- Location: East Coast Steppa
Re: gain structure and mixing aka THE MONEYSHOT THREAD
Why wouldn't apple just cut off the freq at, let's say, 90 hz? I feel like that would be alot smarter.dogmancar wrote: I-pod earbuds can't reproduce low bass frequency much less sub bass. The high frequency you hear with i-pod headphones is probably just their lousy attempt at sub bass. It could also be the rattling from where the speaker came loose I had a pare of sonys that did that to me.
How would you go about faking a sub layer using shit speakers, dizzy? and what to you mean fake the sub by distorting it? could you let me know of some of these low freq distortion plugs your'e talking about. What i really think i might try is just layering another sin wave that mimics the sub at about 90-150 hz just so it stands out a little more. Reason i dont like this though...that could easily take attention away from it. And since i have my melody in my sub, i dont want that to happen.Ldizzy wrote:to make ur bassline more audible on smaller systems/systems with bad low freq response, u'll need to give an impression of bass, to fake it.. because u wont be able to make a shitty clock radio to produce 20hz...
amongst other things which im less familiar with.. u can fake the existence of bass by adding up harmonics that will lead the listener to get an impression that there is actually bass while there isnt. = distortion... certain plugins specialize in that.. while it's still possible to help the issue with any distortion plugin and a good understanding of distortion itself..
but that is way off topic...
-
- Posts: 1737
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:56 pm
- Location: http://www.scmastering.com , maac at subvertmastering dot com
- Contact:
Re: gain structure and mixing aka THE MONEYSHOT THREAD
Not mixing on a 30W guitar amp would be a startRedderious wrote:Do i just need some quality monitors to assure that my mix won't get messy on other systems? How do i make the mix quality more generic i guess?

Getting decent monitoring will set you off in the right direction - you simply can't expect to produce a good mix on a guitar amp. It's probably mono, likely has very high distortion (in monitor terms) and it designed for completely another purpose.
With respect - this is all pretty off topic.... I'd suggest (politely!) that if Mr Nice Mod sees this they could split it as it doesn't reeeeeally belong in this thread. I know it kiiind of does, but it'd be nice to keep the thread from meandering too much from gain structuring if poss

Not meaning to be rude!
www.scmastering.com / email: macc at subvertmastering dot com
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests