Laszlo wrote:magma wrote: it implies that it's ok for blacks to dress/act a certain way, but it's not ok for whites... this can only be because blacks are a lower form of human than whites... they have no choice about being unrefined, unintelligent and violent, but the whites do
I don't really know where to start with this.
Howso? The logic seems pretty clear... blacks were enslaved because society at the time held the opinion that they were a lower form of human. Fast-forward ~200 years and whites are seen as "stupid" if they act "black". i.e. People
still think that blacks are less intelligent/different... they're to be
pitied like the disadvantaged kid in school that's trying his best, whites who act like them are to be despised like the clever kid who ignored his teachers and chose a life of crime.
Indeed, but they're very associated...
Could you explain that please?
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q= ... gger&meta=
A quick Google is a good way to see if society is asking the same questions as you. This is a common enough thought. The first notable Chav charicature was Ali G... half the country couldn't work out if he was supposed to be black or not, but no makeup was involved... it was a just Jewish man wearing "black" clothes and talking in an urban accent. That's all it takes to make people start thinking about race.
magma wrote:and you can't deny that Chav is a pretty much white-only stereotype, can you?
I can absolutely deny that, and not just for the sake of argument (this is costing you £5, btw). Perhaps you're right in saying that it doesn't apply to black youths in tracksuits, but I have seen it applied to asian youths as well as oriental youths, and so I disregard the term 'Chav' as being anything to do colour.
Seeing as the cultural stereotypes for urban fashion, crime and behaviour don't generally extend to Asian communities, it's not really as relevant - wigger is directed at people trying to be "Black", rather than anything else. Tracksuits/trainers/baseball caps as fashion items came from Hip Hop culture... if you're going to bash a white kid for dressing like Dame Dash, but not Dame Dash, well... it really is hard to say it's not racism. How come it's ok for the black guy to dress a certain way but not the white?
Semi-related: When Eugenicists used to "rank" the races, they tended to put Asians above Whites in terms of intelligence and work ethic (possibly as a way of making their results seem more acceptable - if we're not top, we
can't be racist!) and so I can imagine that the same attitudes towards "acting black" could well be applicable. I've never seen it happen, but I don't see why it wouldn't.
OTT Liberalism? Again, all rather subjective, but oh well, if you say so... I was labouring under the impression that's what rave culture was supposed to be all about. Is it really OTT to suggest that demonising large sections of a society is bad for that society? I think it seems fairly logical, but I am a bit of a hippy deep down... it's a major reason I fell in love with ravers so heavily.
