Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Off Topic (Everything besides dubstep)
Forum rules
Please read and follow this sub-forum's specific rules listed HERE, as well as our sitewide rules listed HERE.

Link to the Secret Ninja Sessions community ustream channel - info in this thread
User avatar
nobody
Posts: 3003
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 7:20 am
Location: falafel

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Post by nobody » Wed Feb 11, 2015 9:24 pm

nothing to hide lol, ever smoked a joint in front of your telly?
om_unit wrote: wtf is juke?

User avatar
mason666
Posts: 1452
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2014 10:51 am

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Post by mason666 » Wed Feb 11, 2015 9:28 pm

yh but what the polis gonna do lol

are they gonna happen to be watchign my tv feed out of millions and then raid my house for a joint
nowaysj wrote:Only came back to tell Maxon he is a little cnut
wolf89 wrote:I look like an idiot

User avatar
mks
Posts: 4155
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 3:35 am
Location: Planet Earth

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Post by mks » Thu Feb 12, 2015 3:12 am

Guys, this is all running on outdated protocols with TCP/IP basically built on top of them. I'm talking about SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) systems running PLC's (Programmable Logic Controllers). These are controlling our energy infrastructure, nuclear power plants etc., down to our stoplights. I have done MITM (Man In The Middle) attacks in a closed environment on some PLC's for an Industrial Security class, and these PLC's and protocols are very vulnerable.

Image

User avatar
_ronzlo_
Posts: 1006
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:29 pm

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Post by _ronzlo_ » Thu Feb 12, 2015 5:11 am

Of course they are. They're run by old pennypinchers who still don't understand this stuff and balk at the costs of upgrading to sufficient levels. Not unlike Sony.

User avatar
nowaysj
Posts: 23281
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:11 am
Location: Mountain Fortress

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Post by nowaysj » Thu Feb 12, 2015 5:38 am

Probably worse than Sony, but with nuclear implications.
Join Me
DiegoSapiens wrote:oh fucking hell now i see how on point was nowaysj
Soundcloud

User avatar
mks
Posts: 4155
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 3:35 am
Location: Planet Earth

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Post by mks » Thu Feb 12, 2015 5:55 am

Sony is a good example though in regards to the fact that if it was indeed North Korea that was behind the attack, there are reports that they have a 3000 person strong cyber attack army. Who knows how many the US and the UK have.

User avatar
soronery
Posts: 1642
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:56 am
Location: Pyongyang

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Post by soronery » Thu Feb 12, 2015 11:21 am

everything will become clear once we switch to ndn protocol
Image

DiegoSapiens wrote:
zoronery frees the realness

DiegoSapiens wrote:
cheers coronary

_ronzlo_ wrote:
BIG UP YOSELF HAN SORO

OGLemon
Posts: 5153
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 1:33 pm

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Post by OGLemon » Thu Feb 12, 2015 12:59 pm

mks wrote:
[+] Spoiler
Guys, this is all running on outdated protocols with TCP/IP basically built on top of them. I'm talking about SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) systems running PLC's (Programmable Logic Controllers). These are controlling our energy infrastructure, nuclear power plants etc., down to our stoplights. I have done MITM (Man In The Middle) attacks in a closed environment on some PLC's for an Industrial Security class, and these PLC's and protocols are very vulnerable.

Image
you should make a die hard movie

User avatar
_ronzlo_
Posts: 1006
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:29 pm

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Post by _ronzlo_ » Thu Feb 12, 2015 4:48 pm

New robot:


User avatar
mks
Posts: 4155
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 3:35 am
Location: Planet Earth

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Post by mks » Fri Feb 13, 2015 3:44 am

OGLemon wrote:
mks wrote:
[+] Spoiler
Guys, this is all running on outdated protocols with TCP/IP basically built on top of them. I'm talking about SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) systems running PLC's (Programmable Logic Controllers). These are controlling our energy infrastructure, nuclear power plants etc., down to our stoplights. I have done MITM (Man In The Middle) attacks in a closed environment on some PLC's for an Industrial Security class, and these PLC's and protocols are very vulnerable.

Image
you should make a die hard movie
What, Die Hard for geeks? That would be an interesting movie.

sixs
Posts: 1476
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 3:21 pm
Location: LK

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Post by sixs » Fri Feb 13, 2015 6:59 am

in 2025 we will be smoking joints wwith our telly
taters on that as we jack it

nousd
Posts: 8654
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 2:22 am
Location: approaching the flux pavillion

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Post by nousd » Fri Feb 13, 2015 7:39 am

and sitting around chatting shit with my bestie, the vacuum cleaner


(nice to revive a wbu thread
with 2nd poster 3rdi)
{*}

User avatar
cyclopian
Posts: 1275
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 11:28 pm
Location: Oakland, CA

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Post by cyclopian » Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:06 am

mks wrote:
OGLemon wrote:
mks wrote:
[+] Spoiler
Guys, this is all running on outdated protocols with TCP/IP basically built on top of them. I'm talking about SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) systems running PLC's (Programmable Logic Controllers). These are controlling our energy infrastructure, nuclear power plants etc., down to our stoplights. I have done MITM (Man In The Middle) attacks in a closed environment on some PLC's for an Industrial Security class, and these PLC's and protocols are very vulnerable.

Image
you should make a die hard movie
What, Die Hard for geeks? That would be an interesting movie.
[+] Spoiler
Image
:middlefinger:

User avatar
finji
Posts: 2922
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:38 am

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Post by finji » Fri Feb 13, 2015 2:48 pm

wub is still here :X
#cyber

User avatar
ultraspatial
Posts: 7818
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 4:17 pm
Location: Bromania

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Post by ultraspatial » Fri Feb 13, 2015 3:19 pm

topmo3 wrote:it's not the fact that you don't have anything to hide just now.. it's just that in the future when everythings forbidden all our consumer electronics etc are rigged and primed to spy on us
we should shun technology and go full on gun-nut puritan doomprepper

User avatar
nowaysj
Posts: 23281
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:11 am
Location: Mountain Fortress

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Post by nowaysj » Fri Feb 13, 2015 3:46 pm

Agreed.
Join Me
DiegoSapiens wrote:oh fucking hell now i see how on point was nowaysj
Soundcloud


User avatar
nowaysj
Posts: 23281
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:11 am
Location: Mountain Fortress

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Post by nowaysj » Tue Feb 24, 2015 4:02 pm

On a couple of separate occasions I was hanging out with some HNWI's on their property, and google started serving up non sequiturious ads on my iphone, but the ads were related to a conversation we were having that was very specific. On one of the occasions the conversation (and ads) centered around a photo of a publication I had taken with my phone.

That's iphone+google.
Join Me
DiegoSapiens wrote:oh fucking hell now i see how on point was nowaysj
Soundcloud


User avatar
ultraspatial
Posts: 7818
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 4:17 pm
Location: Bromania

Re: Google // Skynet // Boston Dynamics // Daleks // RUN

Post by ultraspatial » Wed Feb 25, 2015 11:02 am

fucks sake

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests