ADMIN people need to chill out and seckle down

blizzardmusic · Post by **blizzardmusic** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:48 pm

Ashley wrote:
BlizzardMusic wrote:BTW, theres only one admin. And thats seckle, so you might as well call him directly.
So whats dubway then?

Hes called a forum owner.
You know, them things that own forums?

Send a Private Message to one of the Moderators:
Boomnoise
ThinKing
Ricky Ricardo
BunZero
Conspira
Joe Nice

Send a Private Message To an Admin
Seckle

Send a Private Message To The Forum Owner
Dubway
Email The Forum Owner
dubway@dubstepforum.com

-

see, i even bolded out the text so even your pathetic brain can understand!

u'll thank me later.

ashley · Post by **ashley** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:48 pm

pk- wrote:by the way if people keep seeing that their posts have been edited by me i'm sorry, it's right next to the quote button and i keep hitting it

So that missing posts bollocks was some coverup and you and grand fucked up half the forums by accidentally deleting all the juicy topics?

Saaaafe

dubluke · Post by **dubluke** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:55 pm

The Wiggle Baron wrote:

Come on lads. Lets get thread hijak of the century on the go.

FACE

dubstep_warrior · Post by **dubstep_warrior** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:56 pm

skum bag

bloodly wrong'un.

drquynh · Post by **drquynh** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:56 pm

wobbleman wrote:maybe seckle is in the illuminati, are you seckle? lol, i dont think parson was giving anyone abuse or anything bad atall, he was just defending comments made about him or the subject in a rationale and logical way. parson seems patinate about what he says, ive seen far worse things said by people that havent been modertaed, including stupid things ive said, lol

lol

FSTZ · Post by **FSTZ** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:57 pm

you fuckers asked for it!

thinking · Post by **thinking** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:57 pm

well, so I've just wasted 10 minutes reading thru the 2nd half of that locked thread. I must say that I think several people need to calm down a bit and quit this online oneupmanship - it's a waste of time for all concerned.

I completely echo Seckle's sentiment here:

seckle wrote:you have to realize that the forum isn't a blog and people have a right to say that something's crazy when they think it's crazy. just because you're involved in a thread doesn't mean that everyone in the thread has to discuss matters in a vein that's appropriate to you. if you can't discuss things without resorting to threatening people, then don't get involved in the thread at all. it's not that difficult.

not as a fellow Mod, but as a longtime forum user both here and elsewhere. If you can't stop yourself from losing your rag, step away from the keyboard. If you haven't got enough of a sense of humour to put up with someone taking the piss then don't expose yourself to it in the first place.

This forum is simply a place for those who share a common interest (dubstep, remember?) to talk shit that isn't necessarily music-related, and it would be a shame to see it become a place for petty name-calling and e-posturing, cos Dubway will prob just get rid of it and keep the forum to pure dubstep.

As for those that complain about the way this place is moderated, if it wasn't for Dubway, Seckle, and the Mods (myself included

) this forum wouldn't exist. It's all done for the love in people's spare time, and an enormous collective effort goes on to keep it running. If you don't like it, then you're under no compulsion whatsoever to keep posting/reading.

parson · Post by **parson** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:58 pm

and with that, i'm out.

jred · Post by **jred** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:03 pm

yeah what thinking said my general replie to name calling .... is "meh"
cos who gives a shit if some random dont agree with you or is trying to bag you ,dont even know them they dont know me maybe if you meet in the real world you could be best of mates and if not "who gives a shit"

badger · Post by **badger** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:04 pm

Parson wrote:and with that, i'm out.

gah

serious mate is this really worth leaving the forum over?

jred · Post by **jred** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:07 pm

yeah come on parson you dont have to take everything onboard water off a ducks back n all that

south3rn · Post by **south3rn** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:10 pm

what we need is some

TEXAS JUSTICE

datura · Post by **datura** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:11 pm

It's never good to lose people in the forum over things like this but it happens and i can see why parson might not want to spend time in here anymore.

take it easy mate, you were always a good read.

xor · Post by **xor** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:18 pm

I don't get it...Parson was rude from the outset and aggressive to many, particularly to Seckle and Stanton, and yet people are saying they don't see what he did wrong. He may have been smart and entertaining in the past, but seriously, he was way too defensive in this thread.

Just out of interest Parson (and this is a serious question), are you that removed from open-mindedness and the general consensus, that you can't see that your beliefs might draw a little well intentioned jokery, that your aggressive reactions might just get in the way of proper discussion once the jokes were done?

d_three · Post by **d_three** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:24 pm

South3rn wrote:what we need is some

TEXAS JUSTICE

you're doing it wrong!

masstronaut · Post by **masstronaut** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:28 pm

XOR wrote:I don't get it...Parson was rude from the outset and aggressive to many, particularly to Seckle and Stanton, and yet people are saying they don't see what he did wrong. He may have been smart and entertaining in the past, but seriously, he was way too defensive in this thread.

Just out of interest Parson (and this is a serious question), are you that removed from open-mindedness and the general consensus, that you can't see that your beliefs might draw a little well intentioned jokery, that your aggressive reactions might just get in the way of proper discussion once the jokes were done?

Not arguing with you XOR, but what you say allows me to make this point:

I think if the views of say Muslims or Rastafarians were described as

"nonsense for idiots with the minds of curious ADHD children
ooor
fun fictional mysticism that injects excitment into the lives of chronic masturbators"

there would be outrage and the poster would at least be reprimanded. What do you think? Or do you think someone's beliefs can be so marginal as to make it permissible to dismiss them in those terms, or to call them a 'fucking mentalist'?

showguns · Post by **showguns** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:29 pm

XOR wrote:I don't get it...Parson was rude from the outset and aggressive to many, particularly to Seckle and Stanton, and yet people are saying they don't see what he did wrong. He may have been smart and entertaining in the past, but seriously, he was way too defensive in this thread.

Just out of interest Parson (and this is a serious question), are you that removed from open-mindedness and the general consensus, that you can't see that your beliefs might draw a little well intentioned jokery, that your aggressive reactions might just get in the way of proper discussion once the jokes were done?

stanton, crunkhouse, rekorder and parson have all had dealings like that in the past though. it wasn't anything new and didn't just come out of pocket.

two oh one · Post by **two oh one** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:32 pm

unklefesta wrote:you fuckers asked for it!

It's a lumpfish. Look, here's another:

jred · Post by **jred** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:33 pm

do they taste as good as they look

ADMIN people need to chill out and seckle down

Who is online