symptomatic how you turned this:
i think you did your share of confirming my points, time for something fresh
into this backwards shit:
SD5 wrote:I thought you meant it when you wrote:
alien pimp wrote:time for something fresh
.
Apparently not.
Find it interesting that whilst you want people to study what you've written & debate your points
how can you contradict me without reading me??
And they are not points, but logical consequences of the presented premises.
SD5 wrote:(otherwise they are not rational)
Proved by what?
SD5 wrote:you won't consider your belief system could be irrational and your own defence of it emotional.
What proves I should?
SD5 wrote:You won't acknowledge when I write that I have been there, done that & moved on because I felt disempowered and frustrated...it was doing me harm.
That's why this IS personal...not just about supposed facts (which are, afterall, totally manipulated according to your view) ...it's about your motive, your history, it's about why you believe.
What you are telling here is that you choose a point of view because it was more comfortable, not closer to the truth, do you realise that?
SD5 wrote:PS I suspect English is your second language. If so, maybe I'm expecting a bit much.
Location gave me up?
SD5 wrote:btw, it's not poetry.
that's why i wrote "poem" with quotation marks
SD5 wrote:So, please don't keep giving me the look-at-the-facts line. I have. I recognize connections & manipulations but I don't believe in the big conspiracy. I see people left in that plight as needing a reality check for their own wellbeing.
That's why I taunt you...to elicit something other than the mechanistic responses you give. They seem far more redolent of brainwashing than my spontenaiety.
How about some answers?
you've just got a fair share of answers and qualified for getting ignored, cuz it's getting ridiculous this level of conversation!
