ehbrums1 wrote:wub wrote:(Deux means two in European)You kid right wub ?
Yes, yes I do.
The title of this thread is actually taken from the film Hot Shots - Part Deux! featuring Charlie Sheen.
ehbrums1 wrote:wub wrote:(Deux means two in European)You kid right wub ?

Dead Rats wrote:Mate, these chaps are lads.
"So a couple of old threads (April 2011, yikes) and one that was over 200 pages long (which incidentally, you're posting the follow up thread to, hence the title)"What did I say that was baseless?
Warfare Dubstep wrote:"So a couple of old threads (April 2011, yikes) and one that was over 200 pages long (which incidentally, you're posting the follow up thread to, hence the title)"What did I say that was baseless?
Yes, threads that have been censored, regardless of the time they were posted. Time of posting the thread is not relevant to my topic, why would you even bring that up?

Dead Rats wrote:Mate, these chaps are lads.

epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum
except titsehbrums1 wrote:What do you mean censored? Mods are pretty open about stuff as long as its of a law abiding nature......usually
epochalypso wrote:man dun no bout da 'nuum
wub wrote:Warfare Dubstep wrote:"So a couple of old threads (April 2011, yikes) and one that was over 200 pages long (which incidentally, you're posting the follow up thread to, hence the title)"What did I say that was baseless?
Yes, threads that have been censored, regardless of the time they were posted. Time of posting the thread is not relevant to my topic, why would you even bring that up?
Even so, I still didn't say anything that was baseless. The threads were old. The 200+ page one was locked. My comments, if anything, were mired in easily proven facts.
And again, you have a 45+ page thread here all about Brostep...what more do you want to discuss this particular sub-genre?

Clearly talking about music he enjoys is a waste. Doesn't it make sense to fill the forum with threads about music we don't like? I swear sometimes the mods can be so stubborn...wub wrote:Warfare Dubstep wrote:"So a couple of old threads (April 2011, yikes) and one that was over 200 pages long (which incidentally, you're posting the follow up thread to, hence the title)"What did I say that was baseless?
Yes, threads that have been censored, regardless of the time they were posted. Time of posting the thread is not relevant to my topic, why would you even bring that up?
Even so, I still didn't say anything that was baseless. The threads were old. The 200+ page one was locked. My comments, if anything, were mired in easily proven facts.
And again, you have a 45+ page thread here all about Brostep...what more do you want to discuss this particular sub-genre?
Not necessarily....Warfare Dubstep wrote:wub wrote:Warfare Dubstep wrote:"So a couple of old threads (April 2011, yikes) and one that was over 200 pages long (which incidentally, you're posting the follow up thread to, hence the title)"What did I say that was baseless?
Yes, threads that have been censored, regardless of the time they were posted. Time of posting the thread is not relevant to my topic, why would you even bring that up?
Even so, I still didn't say anything that was baseless. The threads were old. The 200+ page one was locked. My comments, if anything, were mired in easily proven facts.
And again, you have a 45+ page thread here all about Brostep...what more do you want to discuss this particular sub-genre?
Dead Rats wrote:Mate, these chaps are lads.
Ok, so you don't want to actually discuss it - you just want to post over-used JPGs to highlight the situation and your feelings toward it...your call.Warfare Dubstep wrote:
Bro. I'm so glad there's finally somebody like you posting on the forum. You're just so raw and edgy man. These people on here just don't get us. We don't need to talk about things. We have memes and catchy photos that say what we can't put into words bro.Warfare Dubstep wrote:wub wrote:Warfare Dubstep wrote:"So a couple of old threads (April 2011, yikes) and one that was over 200 pages long (which incidentally, you're posting the follow up thread to, hence the title)"What did I say that was baseless?
Yes, threads that have been censored, regardless of the time they were posted. Time of posting the thread is not relevant to my topic, why would you even bring that up?
Even so, I still didn't say anything that was baseless. The threads were old. The 200+ page one was locked. My comments, if anything, were mired in easily proven facts.
And again, you have a 45+ page thread here all about Brostep...what more do you want to discuss this particular sub-genre?
inb4 sonika did it.wub wrote:Ok, so you don't want to actually discuss it - you just want to post over-used JPGs to highlight the situation and your feelings toward it...your call.Warfare Dubstep wrote:
Incidentally, the 'before' pic was taken in, what, 2005? Given that your profile says you're 20, you'd have been 13 when it was shot...was 13yr old you hitting the underground parties to discover 'true dubstep' sounds for yourself back then?
+1 wubwub wrote:Ok, so you don't want to actually discuss it - you just want to post over-used JPGs to highlight the situation and your feelings toward it...your call.Warfare Dubstep wrote:
Incidentally, the 'before' pic was taken in, what, 2005? Given that your profile says you're 20, you'd have been 13 when it was shot...was 13yr old you hitting the underground parties to discover 'true dubstep' sounds for yourself back then?
Dead Rats wrote:Mate, these chaps are lads.
The meme describes my point fully without me having to type an essay that will be too long to read.wub wrote:Ok, so you don't want to actually discuss it - you just want to post over-used JPGs to highlight the situation and your feelings toward it...your call.Warfare Dubstep wrote:
Incidentally, the 'before' pic was taken in, what, 2005? Given that your profile says you're 20, you'd have been 13 when it was shot...was 13yr old you hitting the underground parties to discover 'true dubstep' sounds for yourself back then?
AxeD wrote:post your awful taste in music you assholes
wobbles wrote::3
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests