His support is almost across the political spectrum :/jags wrote:Keynes?Genevieve wrote: The guy most lefists look to for a lesson on monetary policy is the same guy that never asked himself "maybe it's me and not the money?"
Just as I thought I was getting bored of sexHarkat wrote:
RKM wrote: when bae hands u the aux mixtape and your squad blunted 9/11 aye lmao
Don't be sorry for reigniting my interest in sex, m8Harkat wrote:im sorry
RKM wrote: when bae hands u the aux mixtape and your squad blunted 9/11 aye lmao
Thats fucking horribleHarkat wrote:
in the style of fallacy man...Genevieve wrote:No, he was notoriously poor at handling money. His parents knew it and begged him to get a grip of himself, because he was being a financial drain on them too. He lived beyond his means, hiring housekeepers he couldn't afford, etc.Phigure wrote:or maybe cause he didnt want to participate in wage slavery?
It's not just that he 'didn't want to be a wage slave'. He was even terrible at handling money that was given to him by friends and family.
It's not an ad hominem when you go on to explain that his family and relatives begged him not to spend any more of their money and that he didn't just 'opt out of having a job', but that he was actually mismanaging funs he had aquired as gifts.Phigure wrote:in the style of fallacy man...Genevieve wrote:No, he was notoriously poor at handling money. His parents knew it and begged him to get a grip of himself, because he was being a financial drain on them too. He lived beyond his means, hiring housekeepers he couldn't afford, etc.Phigure wrote:or maybe cause he didnt want to participate in wage slavery?
It's not just that he 'didn't want to be a wage slave'. He was even terrible at handling money that was given to him by friends and family.
AD HOMINEM AD HOMINEM AD HOMINEM AD HOMINEM AD HOMINEM AD HOMINEM
OiOiii #BELTERTopManLurka wrote: thanks for confirming
Genevieve wrote:It's not an ad hominem when you go on to explain that his family and relatives begged him not to spend any more of their money and that he didn't just 'opt out of having a job', but that he was actually mismanaging funs he had aquired as gifts.
I was correcting your wrong assertion. You're out of arguments and looked for a cartoon to bail you out.
implying that his views on economics and capitalism are wrong just cause he was bad at personal finance, looks like an ad hominem to meGenevieve wrote:The guy most lefists look to for a lesson on monetary policy is the same guy that never asked himself "maybe it's me and not the money?"
No. I'm not talking about capitalism or economics, but money in specific. Though obviously, money is a big part of economics and the products of free people trading. However...Phigure wrote:Genevieve wrote:It's not an ad hominem when you go on to explain that his family and relatives begged him not to spend any more of their money and that he didn't just 'opt out of having a job', but that he was actually mismanaging funs he had aquired as gifts.
I was correcting your wrong assertion. You're out of arguments and looked for a cartoon to bail you out.implying that his views on economics and capitalism are wrong just cause he was bad at personal finance, looks like an ad hominem to meGenevieve wrote:The guy most lefists look to for a lesson on monetary policy is the same guy that never asked himself "maybe it's me and not the money?"
Dead Rats wrote:Mate, these chaps are lads.
OiOiii #BELTERTopManLurka wrote: thanks for confirming
If she was your mum would you fuck her?hubb wrote:I'd say very broadly that Freud discussed motivation, whereas Nfucktypingthat dealt with instincts -so in that sence Freud made part of the same principle more accesible but also wet as fuck.
And seriously his mother was quite attractive and very sociable, which I personally can't let go when judging the scope of what I've read.
I work in a publishing house and we've released a shit load of Freud and a lot of it seems like it was written by a mind set on having a wank right after putting the pen down.
magma wrote:It's a good job none of this matters.
I don't think you get what you're talking about. Most leftists look toward keynes on monetary policy. Anyone who's actually read marx shouldn't take it for more than a moral reference imoGenevieve wrote:jags wrote:Keynes?Genevieve wrote: The guy most lefists look to for a lesson on monetary policy is the same guy that never asked himself "maybe it's me and not the money?"
magma wrote:It's a good job none of this matters.
Something we shouldn't be doing.jesslem wrote:Most leftists look toward Keynes on monetary policy.
magma wrote:It's a good job none of this matters.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
